42

Maqolada O‘zbekistonda davlat-xususiy sheriklik (PPP) mexanizmlarini rivojlantirish bo‘yicha xalqaro tajriba va ularni milliy sharoitga moslashtirish imkoniyatlari chuqur tahlil qilingan. Xususan, Buyuk Britaniya, Turkiya, Xitoy, Kanada, Avstraliya, Singapur, Malayziya, Hindiston, BAA va Janubiy Koreya tajribasi asosida ularning afzalliklari, kamchiliklari, risklarni boshqarish mexanizmlari va institutsional asoslari ko‘rib chiqilgan. Maqola davomida O‘zbekiston sharoitida PPP loyihalarini rivojlantirishga to‘sqinlik qilayotgan omillar, mavjud imkoniyatlar, moliyaviy va huquqiy asoslar chuqur tahlil qilinib, PESTEL va SWOT tahlillar keltirilgan. Shuningdek, maqolada statistik ma’lumotlar asosida turizm sohasida investitsiya hajmlari, ish o‘rinlari yaratish va xizmatlar sifatini oshirishga PPPning ta’siri yoritilgan. Natijada, davlat, xususiy sektor va xalqaro hamkorlik uchun 10 ta aniq taklif ishlab chiqilgan.

  • Read count 42
  • Date of publication 29-08-2025
  • Main LanguageO'zbek
  • Pages42-48
Ўзбек

Maqolada O‘zbekistonda davlat-xususiy sheriklik (PPP) mexanizmlarini rivojlantirish bo‘yicha xalqaro tajriba va ularni milliy sharoitga moslashtirish imkoniyatlari chuqur tahlil qilingan. Xususan, Buyuk Britaniya, Turkiya, Xitoy, Kanada, Avstraliya, Singapur, Malayziya, Hindiston, BAA va Janubiy Koreya tajribasi asosida ularning afzalliklari, kamchiliklari, risklarni boshqarish mexanizmlari va institutsional asoslari ko‘rib chiqilgan. Maqola davomida O‘zbekiston sharoitida PPP loyihalarini rivojlantirishga to‘sqinlik qilayotgan omillar, mavjud imkoniyatlar, moliyaviy va huquqiy asoslar chuqur tahlil qilinib, PESTEL va SWOT tahlillar keltirilgan. Shuningdek, maqolada statistik ma’lumotlar asosida turizm sohasida investitsiya hajmlari, ish o‘rinlari yaratish va xizmatlar sifatini oshirishga PPPning ta’siri yoritilgan. Natijada, davlat, xususiy sektor va xalqaro hamkorlik uchun 10 ta aniq taklif ishlab chiqilgan.

Русский

В статье подробно анализируются механизмы государственно частного партнёрства (ГЧП) в Узбекистане, международный опыт их внедрения и возможности адаптации к национальным условиям. Рассмотрены примеры Великобритании, Турции, Китая, Канады, Австралии, Сингапура, Малайзии, Индии, ОАЭ и Южной Кореи, включая их преимущества, недостатки, механизмы управления рисками и институциональные основы. В работе анализируются барьеры, возможности, финансовые и правовые аспекты развития ГЧП в Узбекистане с использованием SWOT и PESTEL анализов. Включены статистические данные по инвестициям, созданию рабочих мест и влиянию ГЧП на улучшение качества туристических услуг. Разработано 10 конкретных рекомендаций для государства, частного сектора и международных партнёров.

English

This article provides an in-depth analysis of public-private partnership (PPP) mechanisms in Uzbekistan, focusing on international best practices and the potential for their adaptation to national conditions. Case studies from the United Kingdom, Turkey, China, Canada, Australia, Singapore, Malaysia, India, UAE, and South Korea are examined, highlighting their advantages, disadvantages, risk management approaches, and institutional frameworks. The paper explores barriers, opportunities, financial and legal aspects of PPP development in Uzbekistan, employing SWOT and PESTEL analyses. Statistical data on investment volumes, job creation, and the impact of PPP on improving the quality of tourism services are included. Finally, the study proposes 10 concrete recommendations for government, private sector, and international stakeholders.

№ Author name position Name of organisation
1 Ergasheva D.. - Toshkent amaliy fanlar universiteti
№ Name of reference
1 Abdullah, N.H., Zain, Z.M., & Hamzah, N. (2018). Exploring the Success Factors of Public Private Partnerships in Malaysian Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(2), 05017022.
2 Akintoye, A., Beck, M., & Hardcastle, C. (2015). Public-Private Partnerships: Managing Risks and Opportunities. John Wiley & Sons.
3 Almarri, K., & Boussabaine, A. (2017). A Sustainable Approach to Managing Public–Private Partnership Projects in the UAE. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(4), 761-783.
4 Grimsey, D., & Lewis, M.K. (2018). Public Private Partnerships: The Worldwide Revolution in Infrastructure Provision and Project Finance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
5 Hodge, G., & Greve, C. (2017). Public-Private Partnerships: Governance Scheme or Language Game? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76(3), 379-392.
6 Iossa, E., & Martimort, D. (2015). The Simple Microeconomics of Public–Private Partnerships. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 17(1), 4-48.
7 Liu, T., Wang, Y., & Wilkinson, S. (2019). Identifying critical factors affecting the effectiveness and efficiency of PPP implementation in China. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 25(2), 04019004.
8 Osei-Kyei, R., & Chan, A.P.C. (2016). Implementing Public–Private Partnership Projects in Developing Countries: Insights from Ghana. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 22(4), 05016006.
9 Qaror (2023) O‘zbekiston Resoublikasi Prezidentining “Turizm yo‘nalishidagi islohotlarni yanada jadallashtirish va sohada davlat boshqaruvi tizimini samarali tashkil qilish chora tadbirlari to‘g‘risida”gi Qarori. 27.07.2023 yildagi PQ-238-son
10 Sharma, C., & Bindal, S. (2014). Public–Private Partnerships in India: Lessons from Experiences. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(10), 53-61.
Waiting