3. Beil G.M., Atkins. Inheritance of guantitave characters in grain sorgum //Jowa State Journal of Science. 1965.

2. Аllard R.W. Principles of Plants Breeding, John Willey, Sons. New-York-London-Sidney, 1966.

1. ТурбинН.В., Тарутина Л.А.,Хотылева Л.В. Сравнительная оценка методов анализа комбинационной способности у растений. Ж. Генетика, 1969. № 8. Москва.

4. Cordier, C., Pozo, M.J., Barea, J.M., Gianinazzi, S., Gianinazzi, P.V., 1998. Cell defense response associated with localized and systemic resistance to Phytophthoraparasiticainduced in tomato by an arbuscularmycorrhizal fungus. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 11(10):1017- 1028.

5. Harllen, S.A.S., Reginaldo, S.R., Dirceu, M., Bernardo, A.H., Maria, C.B.P., Ann, M., 2004. Rhizobacterial induction of systemic resistance in tomato plants: Non-specific protection and increase in enzyme activities. Biological Control, 29:288-295.

6.Venere R.J. Role peroxidase in cotton resistant to bacterial blight.// Plant Sci. Lett. 1980. Vol. 20. N 1. P. 47-56.

7.Jung, W.J., Jin, Y.L., Kim, Y.C., Kim, K.Y., Park, R.D., Kim, T.H., 2004. Inoculation of Paenibacillusillinoisensisalleviates root mortality, activates of lignification-related enzymes, and induction of the isozymes in pepper plants infected by Phytophthoracapsici. Biological Control, 30:645-652.

8.Kress W. J., Wurdack K. J., Zimmer E.A., Weigt L. A., and Jans\zen D.H.