1. Лютикова Е. А. Формальное Моделирование падежного варьирования: параметрический подход // Компьютерная лингвистика и интеллектуальные технологии По материалам ежегодной международной конференции «Диалог» (2016) Выпуск 15, C. 461

2. Kemal Altıntaşh Turkish to Crimean Tatar machine translation system (a thesis submitted to the department of computer engineering and the institute of engineering and science of Bilkent university in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of science) 2001, P.30

3. Matlatipov G., Vetulani Z. (2009) Representation of Uzbek Morphology in Prolog. In: Marciniak M., Mykowiecka A. (eds) Aspects of Natural Language Processing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5070. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

4. Sanatbek Matlatipov, Ualsher Tukeyev, Mersaid Aripov Towards the Uzbek Language Endings as a Language Resource.

5. Brian Roark, Richard Sproat. Computational Approaches to Morphology and Syntax. Oxford University Press Inc., New York, 2007, P. 63.

6. N.Abdurakhmonova, The bases of automatic morphological analysis for machine translation, Известия Кыргызский государственный технический университет им. И.Раззокова теоритической и прикладной научнотехнический журнал, 2016 № 2 (38)], C. 12-17.

7. Yuldashev A.A. Аналитические формы глагола в тюркских языках. Москва, – Наука, 1965

8. N.Abdurakhmonova. O„zakdosh fe‟llarning ketma-ket qo„llanilishiga doir – Tilshunoslikka ilk qadam (to„plam III), T., 2007, B. 55-59.

9. Andreea-Rosalia Olteanu. A holistic approach to phrasal verbs, Editura Sfântul Ierarh Nicolae 2012, P 16

10. Yorick Wilks. Machine translation. Its scope and limits. Spring science+Business Media LLC. 2009 UK, P 139. 11. Brian Roark and Richard Sproat. Computational A

11. Brian Roark and Richard Sproat. Computational Approaches to Morphology and Syntax, 2007, OXFORD, P.100. 12. State of the Art in Computational