COGNITIVE AND CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE LITERARY DIALOGUE

Admin bo'lib kirish (www.admin.slib.uz)

Tizim sinov (TEST) rejimida ishlamoqda! Murojat uchun @slib_support

Eski talqinga o'tish link

12 май 2023

Asosiy til:Ingliz

COGNITIVE AND CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF THE LITERARY DIALOGUE

Fan yo'nalishi:

645e1fbde76e3.pdf

PDF

THE LIGHT OF ISLAM

Maqola chop etish see more

MAQOLA ANNOTATSIYASI

The following article deals with the concept analysis in the literary dialogue from the perspective of Cognitive and Cultural linguistics. Cognitive and Cultural linguistics are the modern trends of Linguistics as a result of the anthropocentric paradigm to language. In this approach, the interaction between the language and human is the main basis of this paradigm. Cognitive and Cultural Linguistics have their main notions as interdisciplinary branches of linguistic sciences and “concept” is considered as one of the basic notions of Cognitive and Cultural linguistics as well as being the core of attention of several interdisciplinary branches of linguistics. Different definitions were given to the notion of “concept”. The concept is formed through the individual’s emotional, physical, historical, personal, and social experience gained in the process of perceiving the world. Another definition representing the concept is that it is a complex mental entity as well as being a component of the conceptual world picture conceptually relevant either to the whole community or an individual linguistic personality. At present, several approaches to the notion of concept can be outlined. There are two approaches to the notion of concept: cognitive and cultural. According to the cognitive approach, the concept is the information about the world, what an individual or the community knows, suggests, and thinks about the objects of the world. According to the cultural approach, the concept is defined as a culture-specific and nationally oriented unit, a multifold mental structure consisting of national image-bearing and evaluative layers and characterized by emotional, expressive components and associative links. In this article, concepts Beauty and Love are analyzed according to the study with the notional, image-bearing, and evaluative layers. The conceptual features, which constitute the structure of the concept are revealed at each stage of the analysis in the article. In this regard, two concepts are analyzed according to dictionary definitions in the “notional” level. The image-bearing and evaluative layers are based on the features of the concept in the extracts of literary dialogues of the texts. Besides, the contextual analysis reveals the conceptual features, which are not found at the level of dictionary analysis and phraseological analysis.

MUALIFLAR

Teglar

# concept# language# literary text# cognitive linguistics# cultural linguistics# anthropocentric paradigm# literary dialogue# concept analysis# notional level# imagebearing level

Maqolani baholang

0

0 ta

Maqola idintifikatorlari

ROI:

https://eroi.uz/11.0139/A0523-0062

DOI:

Mavjud emas

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

1. Ashurova, D. U., & Galiyeva, M. R. (2016). Stylistics of the literary text. Tashkent: Turon-Iqbol. 2. Ashurova, D. U., & Galiyeva, M. R. (2016). Text linguistics. Tashkent: Turon-Iqbol. 3. Ashurova, D. U. (2016). The development of modern trends in Uzbekistan. Филология масалалари. Илмий-методик журнал. Тошкент. 4. Dirk, G. (2006). Cognitive linguistics. Berlin-New York. 5. Eshboyeva, D. A. (2014). Effective ways in teaching English language. Актуальные проблемы гуманитарных и естественных наук. №. 8(1). 6. Eshboyeva, D. A. (2014). Techniques and methods for improving reading skills. European science review. 7. Evans, V & Green M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburg: Edinburgh university press. 8. Evans, V. (2007). Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 9. Ismailova, Y. A. (2019). The use of interactive methods in teaching students professional-oriented reading. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 10 (78), 209-213. Soi: http://s-o-i.org/1.1/TAS-10-78-38 Doi: https://dx.doi. org/10.15863/TAS.2019.10.78.38 10. Ismailova, Y. A. (2020). Cross-language phonetic interference in learning the Arabic language. The Light of Islam: Vol. 2020: Iss. 2, Article 7. Available at: https://uzjournals.edu.uz/iiau/vol2020/iss2/7 11. Ismailova, Y.A. (2019). Тhe use of project method in teaching the Arabic language. The Light of Islam: Vol. 2019: Iss. 2, Article 13. Available at: https://uzjournals. edu.uz/iiau/vol2019/iss2/13 12. Kazakbaev, A. (2020). The problems and methods of teaching foreign languages. The Light of Islam: Vol. 2020: Iss. 2, Article 8. Available at: https://uzjournals. edu.uz/iiau/vol2020/iss2/8 13. MacCormac, E. (1985). A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor. Cambridge: MIT Press. 14. Vorobyov, V.V. (1997). Cultural linguistics (theory and methods). 15. Арутyюнова, Н. Д., & Падучева, Е. В. (1985). Истоки, проблемы и категории прагматики. Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. XVI. Москва: Прогресс. 16. Ашурова, Д. У. (1991). Производное слово в свете коммуникативной теории языка. Ташкент. 17. Ашурова, Д. У. (2003). Стилистика текста в парадигме когнитивной лингвистики. Филология масалалари. 18. Ашурова, Д. У. (2012). Когнитивная лингвистика: теоретические и методические проблемы. Хорижий филология: тил, адабиёт, таълим. – Самарқанд. 19. Демьянко, В. З. Когнитивная лингвистика как разновидность интерпретирующего подхода. www. infolex.ru 20. Джумаева, Н. Э., & Сохибов, А. Р. (2014). Педагогические термины и понятия. КАРШИ: Каршинский государственный университет. 21. Джусупов, Н. М. (2006). Лингвокогнитивный аспект исследования символа в художественном тексте. Авт. дис…к.ф.н. 22. Кубрякова, Е. С. и др. (2009). Краткий словарь когнитивных терминов. Москва: МГУ. 23. Маслова, В. А. (2001). Лингвокультурология. Москва: Академия. 24. Маслова, В. А. (2006). Введение в когнитивную лингвистику. Флинта: Наука. 25. Маслова, В. А. (2013). Современные направления в лингвистике. Академия, 2008. 26. Маслова, В. А. Антропоцентрическая парадигма как важнейшая система научных представлений в современной лингвистике. Филология и современность. Сб.науч.труд. – Т.: Изд-во “Meriyus”. 27. Пименова, М. В. Типы концептов и этапы концептуального исследования. Вестник КемГУ, №2 (54), Т.2. 28. Попова, З. Д., & Стернин, И. А. (2007). Когнитивная лингвистика. Москва: Восток Запад. 29. Степанов, Ю. (1981). В поисках прагматики (проблема субъекта). Известия. 30. Шамсематова, Б. Р. (2019). Метод проектов на уроках английского языка. Актуальные проблемы гуманитарных и естественных наук. №. 2. 31. Языкознание. Большой энциклопедический словарь. (1998). Гл. ред. В.Н.Ярцева.– 2-е изд. – Я41 – Москва. Большая Российская энциклопедия.