660e5aa66eefd.pdf
DOI:
Mavjud emas
1. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, W. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28-54.
2.NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. The National Academies Press.
3.Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
4. Linn, M. C., & Hsi, S. (2000). Computers, Teachers, Peers: Science Learning Partners. Routledge. Etkina, E., & Van Heuvelen, A. (2007). Investigative science learning environment—a science process approach to learning physics. International Journal of Science Education, 29(9), 1089-1113.
5.National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
6.Buck, L. B., & Bretz, S. L. (2002). Characterizing the level of inquiry in the undergraduate laboratory. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31(7), 448-452.
7.Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941-967.
8.Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30-33.
9.American Chemical Society. (2012). ACS guidelines and recommendations for the teaching of high school chemistry. Retrieved from https://www.acs.org/content/dam/acsorg/education/resources/highschool/chemmatters/volume30/08August2012/hschem-guidelines.pdf