logo
calendar23 январ 2025
view2
Asosiy til:Ingliz

KLASSIFIKATORLAR1 NIMANI TASNIFLAYDI? YAPON TILIDAGI JINS VA KLASSIFIKATORLAR MORFOSINTAKSI

Fan yo'nalishi:
pdf

67920789a1507.pdf

PDF

MAQOLA ANNOTATSIYASI

quote
Ushbu maqola yapon tilida va boshqa klassifikatorlardan foydalanadigan tillarda klassifikatorlarning funksiyalari va taqsimlanishini o‘rganishga bag‘ishlangan keng qamrovli tadqiqot loyihasining bir qismi hisoblanadi. Loyiha doirasida biz ushbu klassifikatorlarni turli xil otlarni tasniflash tizimlari va hisoblash tizimlari bilan solishtiramiz. Bu maqolada yapon tilidagi klassifikatorlar bantu tillaridagi otlar sinflariga o‘xshashmi yoki ular Yevropa tillaridagi grammatik jins (rod)ga yaqinroqmi, degan masalaga e’tibor qaratamiz. Shuningdek, klassifikatorlarning otlar bilan o‘zaro ta’sirini va qanchalik moslashuvchanligini tahlil qilamiz. Buning uchun oldingi yillardagi adabiyotlar va ona tilida so‘zlashuvchilar o‘rtasida o‘tkazilgan so‘rovlarni sinchiklab o‘rganamiz, shunda ushbu tillarda otlar qanday tasniflanishi va tizimlar qanday farqlanishini aniqlashimiz mumkin bo‘ladi. Tadqiqot natijalariga ko‘ra, yapon tilidagi klassifikatorlar otlar sinflari yoki grammatik jins (rod)ga otlar bilan o‘zaro ta’siri va moslashuvchanligi nuqtayi nazaridan mos kelmaydi. Jonli mavjudotlarning jinsi hisobga olinadigan tuzilmalarni, masalan, so‘roq va mavjudlik konstruksiyalarini kiritish shuni ko‘rsatadiki, klassifikatorlar jonli mavjudotlarning jinsini ko‘rsatmaydi. Ushbu maqolada yapon tilidagi klassifikatorlardan foydalanishning kam o‘rganilgan jihatlari ko‘rib chiqiladi va yuqorida aytib o‘tilgan konstruksiyalarning qiyosiy tahlili taklif etiladi. Ma’lum bo‘lishicha, bu konstruksiyalar ilgari tegishli adabiyotlarda o‘rganilmagan. Ushbu ish yapon tilidagi klassifikatorlarga bag‘ishlangan bo‘lsa-da, u, ayniqsa, miqdor, hisoblash xususiyatlari va ommaviy hisoblashdagi farqlar nuqtayi nazaridan klassifikatorlardan foydalanadigan boshqa tillar uchun ham, klassifikatorlardan foydalanmaydigan tillar uchun ham muhim ahamiyatga ega.

MUALIFLAR

Teglar

# gender# род# анимация# Animatsiya# yapon tili# японский язык# classifiers# animacy# mass-count distinction# morphosyntax# Japanese# klassifikatorlar# jins (rod)# ko‘plik va hisobni farqlash# morfosintaksis# классификаторы# разграничение множественности и # морфосинтаксис

Maqolani baholang

0

0 ta

Maqola idintifikatorlari

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2000). Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford University Press.

Aikhenvald, A. Y., & Mihas, E. I. (Eds.). (2019). Genders and classifiers: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198842019.001.0001

Allan, K. (1977). Classifiers. Language, 53(2), 285–311.

Bale, A., & Barner, D. (2009). The interpretation of functional heads: Using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics, 26(3), 217–252.

Borer, H. (2005). In name only. Oxford University Press.

Cheng, L. L.-S., & Sybesma, R. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(4), 509–542. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554192

Chierchia, G. (1998a). Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and grammar (pp. 53– 103). Kluwer.

Chierchia, G. (1998b). Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6(4), 339–405. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324218506

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton de Gruyter

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Foris

Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. MIT Press.

Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge University Press

Corbett, G. G. (2000). Number. Cambridge University Press

Corbett, G. G. (2013). Number of genders. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), WALS Online (v2020.4) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13950591

Dixon, R. M. W. (1986). Noun classes and noun classification in typological perspectives. In C. Colette (Ed.), Noun classes and categorization (pp. 105–112). John Benjamins.

Downing, P. (1996). Numeral classifier systems: The case of Japanese. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Greenberg, J. (1972). Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. Working Papers in Language Universals, 9, 2–39

Inagaki, S., & Barner, D. (2009). Countability in absence of count syntax: Evidence from Japanese quantity judgments. In S. Inagaki, M. Hiraiwa, S. Arita, Y. Hirakawa, H. Morikawa, M. Nakayama, H. Sirai, & J. Tsubakita (Eds.), Studies in language sciences 8: Papers from the eighth annual conference of the Japanese Society for Language Sciences (pp. 111–126). Kuroshio Publisher.

Li, X. (2013). Numeral classifiers in Chinese: The syntax-semantics interface. De Gruyter.

Lochbihler, B., Oxford, W., & Welch, N. (2021). The person-animacy connection: Evidence from Algonquian and Dene. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, 66(3), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2021.14

Matthewson, L. (2004). On the methodology of semantic fieldwork. International Journal of American Linguistics, 70(4), 369–415.

Mizuguchi, S. (2004a). Individuation in numeral classifier languages: A case of Japanese classifiers and plurals. Shohakusha.

Mizuguchi, S. (2004b). Ruibetsushi towa nanika [What are classifiers?]. In Y. Nishimitsu & S. Mizuguchi (Eds.), Ruibetsushi no taishoo [Comparison of classifiers] (pp. 3–22). Kuroshio Publisher.

Nomoto, H. (2013). Number in classifier languages (Doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota.

Rothstein, S. (2010). Counting and the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics, 27(3), 343–397. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffq007

Shimojo, M. (1997). The role of the general category in the maintenance of numeral-classifier systems: The case of tsu and ko in Japanese. Linguistics, 35(4), 705–733. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1997.35.4.705

Sutton, P. R., & Filip, H. (2016). Counting in context: Count/mass variation and restrictions on coercion in collective artifact nouns. In Proceedings of SALT 26 (pp. 350–370).

Watanabe, A. (2006). Functional projections of nominals in Japanese: Syntax of classifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 24(1), 241–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-005-3042-4

Watanabe, A. (2008). The structure of DP. In S. Miyagawa & M. Saito (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics (pp. 513–540). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195307344.001.0001

public

SLIB.uz — O'zbekiston ilmiy jurnallari va maqolalar yagona tizimda ilmiy nashirlarni bir joyda ko'rish, izlash va ulardan foydalanish imkonini beruvchi zamonaviy platforma.

Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda
instagramtelegramyoutubefacebook

Bog'lanish uchun

Manzil:Chilonzor tumani Qatortol ko'chasi 60B

Tel:+998(55)511-44-00

Savol-javob va takliflar uchun

© 2026 Barcha huquqlar himoyalangan.