1. Welles, B. F. (2014). Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 11(4), 535-537.

2. Sandberg, A. (2021). Ethics of brain emulations. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 33(4), 711-730. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2019.1620283

3. Roco, M. C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (Eds.). (2003). Converging technologies for improving human performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Springer Science & Business Media.

4. Bostrom, N. (2005). A history of transhumanist thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14(1), 1-25. http://jetpress.org/volume14/bostrom.html

5. Jeppesen, L. (2016). DIY neuroscience hacks to optimize cognitive self-regulation. DIY Neurology, DIY Therapy: Practices, Discourses, Infrastructures, 73-93.

6. More, M., & Vita-More, N. (Eds.). (2013). The transhumanist reader: Classical and contemporary essays on the science, technology, and philosophy of the human future. John Wiley & Sons.

7. 1Hook, C. C. (2004). The techno sapiens are coming. Christianity Today, 48(1), 36-39.

8. Bishop, P., & Hines, A. (2012). Teaching about the future. Palgrave Macmillan.

9. Chermack, T. J. (2004). Improving decision-making with scenario planning. Futures, 36(3), 295-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00156-3

10. Adam, D. (2020). Special report: The simulations driving the world’s response to COVID-19. Nature, 580(7803), 316-318. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01003-6

11. King, G., & Kay, J. (2020). Radical uncertainty: Decision-making beyond the numbers. W.W. Norton & Company.

12. Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. University of Chicago Press.

13. Vermeersch, E. (2012). The precautionary principle: An ill-founded concept that should be abandoned. In H. Ahteensuu & I. Pölönen (Eds.), The precautionary principle in environmental and technological policy (pp. 223-243). Tampere University Press.

14. Kohl, U. (2004). The precautionary principle in Germany - enabling government. Interpreting the precautionary principle, 61-90.