Durgut, Y. (2021, September 30). Inter-laboratory comparisons and their roles in accreditation. European Journal of Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1001957

European Cooperation for Accreditation. (2013). EA-4/02 M:2013 – Evaluation of uncertainty of measurement in calibration.

Galliana, F., Capra, P. P., Cerri, R., D’Elia, V., Gasparotto, E., Roncaglione Tet, L., Del Moro, M., & Cozzani, A. (2017). Inter-laboratory measurement comparison between INRIM and ESA on electrical quantities. 18th International Congress of Metrology, 07005. https://doi.org/10.1051/ metrology/201707005

International Organization for Standardization. (2017). ISO/IEC 17025:2017 – General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.

International Organization for Standardization. (2023). ISO/IEC 17043:2023 – Conformity assessment – General requirements for proficiency testing.

Khafaga, A., Matharu, R., Sadler, W., & Toman, T. (2021). Confidence and traceability in beverage can dimensional measurements using non-contact techniques. Measurement: Sensors, 18, 100205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2021.100205

National Institute of Metrology. (n.d.). https://inm.md/eng

Parsons, S., & Clegg, W. (2009). Random and systematic errors. In Crystal Structure Analysis: Principles and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219469.003.0016

Singh, E., & Rajak, M. (2024). Inter-laboratory comparison (ILC) & proficiency testing (PT): Principles and practices. In Book chapter (publication details pending).

Uzbek National Institute of Metrology. (n.d.). https://www.nim.uz/eng

UzNIM & NIM. (2023). Final report of bilateral inter-laboratory comparison: Comparison of calibration results for frequency counter MD/097/23.