INGLIZ VA O‘ZBEK TURIZM DISKURSINING LINGVOMADANIY XUSUSIYATLARI

Admin bo'lib kirish (www.admin.slib.uz)

Tizim sinov (TEST) rejimida ishlamoqda! Murojat uchun @slib_support

Eski talqinga o'tish link

14 август 2025

Asosiy til:Ingliz

INGLIZ VA O‘ZBEK TURIZM DISKURSINING LINGVOMADANIY XUSUSIYATLARI

Fan yo'nalishi:

689deb191e67c.pdf

PDF

“O‘zbekistonda xorijiy tillar” ilmiy-metodik elektron jurnal

Maqola chop etish see more

MAQOLA ANNOTATSIYASI

Maqolada turizm diskursining lingvomadaniy jihatlari, ingliz va o‘zbek turizmiga oid lug‘at va terminologiyaning turli til darajalaridagi qiyosiy tahlili, turistlarni ko‘proq jalb qilish uchun turistik broshyuralarda qanday ishontirish usullari qo‘llanilishi ko‘rib chiqiladi. Turizm diskursi — turli xil ijtimoiy guruhlardan yoki til jamoalaridan bo‘lgan odamlar o‘rtasidagi muloqotni o‘z ichiga olgan alohida diskurs hisoblanadi. U asosan ma’lum bir sayohat manzili yoki turistik mahsulotni targ‘ib qilishga qaratilgan. Shuningdek, bu tadqiqot turizm diskursining asosiy xususiyatlari, shuningdek, bu diskursning boshqa diskurs turlaridan farqlarini ko‘rsatadi. Tanlangan ingliz va oʻzbek matnlari oʻrtasidagi lingvomadaniy farqlar va o‘xshashliklarni ochib berish turli madaniyatlar va ularning til tizimlarini yaxshiroq tushunishga yordam beradi. Shu sababli bu maqolaning asosiy maqsadi har ikki tilning turizm tili va terminologiyasini ularning lingvomadaniy xususiyatlaridan kelib chiqib tadqiq etish hisoblanadi. Ingliz va oʻzbek sayohat broshyuralarining qiyosiy va leksikografik tahlili asosida oʻtkazilgan tadqiqot shuni koʻrsatadiki, ingliz turizm diskursida maxsus ta’sirchan-bo‘yoqdor lugʻatlar, xususan, targʻib qilinayotgan mahsulot yoki manzilni ijobiy baholovchi va tavsiflovchi sifatlar, turli uslubiy vositalar, asosan, metafora va boshqa noodatiy iboralar ko‘proq ishlatilsa, oʻzbek tili diskursida esa bir qancha o‘zlashma so‘zlar, realiyalar va ma’lum bir joyga oid milliy so‘zlar kuzatiladi. O‘zbek turizm broshyuralarida tavsiflovchi sifatlar soni nisbatan kamroq bo‘lib, ko‘pincha otli so‘z birikmalaridan foydalanish orqali ma’lum bir sayohat manzili yoki mahsulot taklif qiladigan imkoniyatlarni targ‘ib qiladi. Turizm sohasi ko‘plab sohalarni o‘z ichiga olganligi sababli turizm atamalarining lingvomadaniy o‘ziga xosliklarini o‘rganish nafaqat tilshunoslar, tarjimonlar, o‘qituvchilar va turizm mutaxassislari, balki turizm biznesi bilan shug‘ullanuvchi har bir kishi uchun samarali madaniyatlararo muloqotni ta’minlaydi.

MUALIFLAR

Teglar

# заимствования# o‘zlashgan so‘zlar# Borrowings# реалии# realia# persuasive language# tourism discourse# lingua-cultural peculiarities# tourism terminology# turizm diskursi# lingvomadaniy xususiyatlar# ishontiruvchi til# turizm terminologiyasi# туристический дискурс# лингвокультурные особенности# убедительный язык# туристическая терминология

Maqolani baholang

0

0 ta

Maqola idintifikatorlari

ROI:

https://eroi.uz/11.0222/A0825-0009

DOI:

Mavjud emas

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

Aghabeyli, V. (2015). The Specific Lingua-Cultural Features of the American English for English Learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 5(1), 196.

Agorni, M. (2016). Tourism across languages and cultures: Accessibility through translation. Cultus, 2016(2), 8-27.

Andereck, K. L. (2005). Evaluation of a tourist brochure. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 18(2), 1-13.

Ashurova, D. U., & Galieva, M. R. (2019). Cultural linguistics. Tashkent: VneshInvestProm, 208.

Cappelli, G. (2013). Travelling words: Languaging in English tourism discourse. In Travels and translations (pp. 353-374).

Cesiri, D. (2017). Balancing Tourism Promotion and Professional Discourse: A Corpus-based Analysis of Digital Travel Guidebooks Promoting Venice in English. EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics, 2, 247-255.

Cohen, E., & Cooper, R. L. (1986). Language and tourism. Annals of tourism research, 13(4), 533-563.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge university press.

Dann, G. M. (1996). The language of tourism: A sociolinguistic perspective. GB: cabi.

Durán-Muñoz, I. (2019). Adjectives and their keyness: A corpus-based analysis of tourism discourse in English. Corpora, 14(3), 351-378. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge. Polity. Francesconi, S. (2014). Reading tourism texts: A multimodal analysis (Vol. 36). Channel view publications.

Goshkheteliani, I., & Kalandia, A. (2022). Lingua-cultural Peculiarities of Tourism Discourse and the Perspective of its Teaching. International Journal of Multilingual Education, (21), 31-52. Gotti, M. (2003). Specialized discourse: Linguistic features and changing conventions.

Isakova, E., Kryukova, N., & Aleksandrova, E. (2021). Discourse of tourism: rhetoric and metaphorical aspects (in education and tourist brochures). In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 273, p. 09039). EDP Sciences.

Isxakovna, Y. N. (2024). Linguistic and cultural characteristics of borrowed terms to tourism in English, Uzbek and Russian languages. Journal of Advanced Scientific Research (ISSN: 0976-9595), 4(1). Jalilifar, A., & Moradi, Y. (2019). Tourism discourse revisited: An analysis of evaluative strategies in tourist brochures from a systemic functional linguistics perspective. Journal of English Studies, (17), 211- 232.

Kiss, I. (2018). The persuasive discourse function in the language of tourism. Argumentum, 14, 150-162.

Koval, N., Kushka, B., Nagachevska, O., Valeriia Mykhaylivna, S., & Uhryn, L. (2023). Changing nature of English tourism discourse: A linguistic approach. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on Communication and Language in Virtual Spaces.

Luo, J., & Huang, T. (2015). Genre-based analysis of American tourism brochure. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3(09), 200.Maci, S.M. (2018). An introduction to English tourism discourse. Sociolinguistica , 32 (1), 25- 42.

Mauranen, A. (2010). Features of English as a lingua franca in academia. Helsinki English Studies, 6(6), 6-28.

Saidovna, V. F. (2021). Tourism discourse and its terminology. JournalNX, 7(03), 150-152.

Shyliaeva, T. (2019). Use of metaphors in tourist discourse of danube region. Journal of Danubian Studies and Research, 9(1).

Thurlow, C., & Jaworski, A. (2011). Tourism discourse: Languages and banal globalization. Applied linguistics review.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & society, 4(2), 249-283.

Vasylivna, K. O. (2022). REALIA AS A REPRESENTATION FEATURE OF ENGLISH TOURISM TEXTS. ЛЬВІВСЬКИЙ ФІЛОЛОГІЧНИЙ ЧАСОПИС, 92.

Zamira, S. (2023). Lingua-cultural features of personal pronouns. Евразийский научный журнал, (12), 22-24.