2. AE_2_2026_2(23)-19-2....pdf
Science ID: DQD-0525-0034
Science ID: MBX-0525-0009
Boukortt N.E.I. Numerical optimization of 0.5-μm-thick Cu(In₁₋ₓGaₓ)Se₂ solar cell // Optik. – 2020. – Vol. 200. – Article 163409. – DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.163409.
Boukortt N.E.I., Patanè S., Adouane M., AlHammadi R. Numerical optimization of ultrathin CIGS solar cells with rear surface passivation // Solar Energy. – 2021. – Vol. 220. – Pp. 590–597. – DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2021.03.078.
Gloeckler M., Sites J.R. Band-gap grading in Cu(In,Ga)Se₂ solar cells // Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids. – 2005. – Vol. 66. – Pp. 1891–1894. – DOI: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2005.09.087.
Decock K., Lauwaert J., Burgelman M. Characterization of graded CIGS solar cells // Energy Procedia. – 2010. – Vol. 2. – Pp. 49–54. – DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2010.07.009.
Saadat M., Moradi M., Zahedifar M. CIGS absorber layer with double grading Ga profile for highly efficient solar cells // Superlattices and Microstructures. – 2016. – Vol. 92. – Pp. 303–307. – DOI: 10.1016/j.spmi.2016.02.036.
Boukortt N.E.I., Patanè S. Single junction-based thin-film CIGS solar cells optimization with efficiencies approaching 24.5 % // Optik. – 2020. – Vol. 218. – Article 165240. – DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165240.
Boukortt N.E.I., Patanè S., Abdulraheem Y.M. Numerical investigation of CIGS thin-film solar cells // Solar Energy. – 2020. – Vol. 204. – Pp. 440–447. – DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2020.05.021.
Richter M., Schubbert C., Eraerds P., Parisi J., Riedel I., Dalibor T., Palm J. Comprehensive simulation model for Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)₂ solar cells // Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. – 2015. – Vol. 132. – Pp. 162–171. – DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.08.047.
Lorbada R.V., Walter T., Marrón D.F., Lavrenko T., Muecke D. A deep insight into the electronic properties of CIGS modules with monolithic interconnects based on 2D simulations with TCAD // Coatings. – 2019. – Vol. 9. – Article 128. – DOI: 10.3390/coatings9020128.
Ghorbani T., Zahedifar M., Moradi M., Ghanbari E. Influence of affinity, band gap and ambient temperature on the efficiency of CIGS solar cells // Optik. – 2020. – Vol. 223. – Article 165541. – DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165541.
Di Napoli S., Locatelli M., Sozzi G. Numerical simulation of high-efficiency CIGS-based solar cells. – Università di Parma, 2018. – 226 p.
Sentaurus TCAD. Sentaurus Device User Guide. Version N-2017.09-SP2. – Synopsys, Mountain View, CA, USA, 2017.
Salas J.F.L. Modeling and Simulation of Charge Carrier Recombination Dynamics in Cu(In,Ga)Se₂ Thin Film Solar Cells. – Oldenburg, 1990.
Kumar A., Goyal A.K., Gupta U., Tanya, Gupta N., Chaujar R. Increased efficiency of 23% for CIGS solar cell by using ITO as front contact // Materials Today: Proceedings. – 2020. – Vol. 28. – Pp. 361–365. – DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.688.
Schubbert C., Eraerds P., Richter M., Parisi J., Riedel I., Dalibor T., Palm J. Performance ratio study based on a device simulation of a 2D monolithic interconnected Cu(In,Ga)(Se,S)₂ solar cell // Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells. – 2016. – Vol. 157. – Pp. 146–153. – DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.002.
Bechlaghem S., Zebentout B., Benamara Z. The major influence of the conduction-band-offset on Zn(O,S)/CuIn₀.₇Ga₀.₃Se₂ solar cells // Results in Physics. – 2018. – Vol. 10. – Pp. 650–654. – DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.07.006.
Sentaurus TCAD. Sentaurus Mesh User Guide. Version N-2017.09. – Synopsys, 2017.