logo
calendar30 Iyun 2026
view27
Asosiy til:O'zbek

3D MODELLASHTIRISH MUHITIDA MAKTAB GEOMETRIYASI VA FIZIKASINI SINXRON VA ASINXRON BOG‘LAB O‘QITISHNING DIDAKTIK MODELI

Fan yo'nalishi:Ta'lim
pdf

Sobirova M. R._2fc7c003.pdf

PDF

Tadbirkorlik va pedagogika ilmiy-uslubiy jurnali

Tadbirkorlik va pedagogika ilmiy-uslubiy jurnali

Maqola chop etishsee more

MAQOLA ANNOTATSIYASI

quote
Ushbu maqolada maktab geometriya fanini 3D modellashtirish asosida fizika fani bilan sinxron va asinxron bog‘lab o‘qitish masalalari ko‘rib chiqiladi. Tadqiqotda geometriya va fizika fanlari o‘rtasidagi fanlararo bog‘liqlikning nazariy asoslari tahlil qilinadi hamda 3D modellashtirish texnologiyalaridan foydalanish imkoniyatlari yoritiladi. Shuningdek, geometriya fanini fizika bilan integratsiyalashgan holda o‘qitishga qaratilgan o‘quv modeli taklif etiladi. Mazkur model o‘quvchilarning fazoviy tasavvurini rivojlantirish, murakkab geometrik shakllarni tushunishni osonlashtirish hamda fanlararo bilimlarni mustahkamlashga xizmat qiladi. Tadqiqot natijalari shuni ko‘rsatadiki, 3D modellashtirish asosida tashkil etilgan integratsiyalashgan o‘quv jarayoni ta’lim samaradorligini oshirishga ijobiy ta’sir ko‘rsatadi.

MUALLIFLAR

Science ID: DSD-0726-0004

Teglar

# ta’lim# tafakkur# modellashtirish# sinxron# fizika# o‘qitish# geometriya# bog‘liqlik# fanlararo# asinxron# fazoviy# 3d# modeli

Maqolani baholang

0
0 ta baho
5
4
3
2
1

Maqola idintifikatorlari

ROI:

https://eroi.uz/11.187/A026-738606

DOI:

Mavjud emas

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

1. Papert S. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. – New York: Basic Books, 1980. – P. 252.

2. Resnick M. Lifelong Kindergarten: Cultivating Creativity through Projects, Passion, Peers, and Play. – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017. – P. 208.

3. Lesh R., Doerr H. Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching. – Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003. – P. 624.

4. Peled I. Enhancing Geometric Thinking through Visualization and Representation // International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 1999. Vol. 30, No. 4. – P. 535-547.

5. Wieman C., Perkins K., Adams W. Oersted Medal Lecture 2007: Interactive Simulations for Teaching Physics: What Works, What Doesn’t, and Why // American Journal of Physics. 2008. Vol. 76, No. 4. – P. 393-399.

6. Mazur E. Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual. – Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997. – P. 253 p.

7. Finkelstein N., Adams W., Keller C. et al. When Learning about the Real World is Better Done Virtually: A Study of Substituting Computer Simulations for Laboratory Equipment // Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research. 2005. Vol. 1, No. 1. – P. 1-8.

8. Dewey J. Democracy and Education. – New York: Macmillan, 1916. – P. 434.

9. Beane J.A. Curriculum Integration: Designing the Core of Democratic Education. – New York: Teachers College Press, 1997. – P. 144.

10. Fogarty R. How to Integrate the Curricula. – Illinois: Skylight Publishing, 1991. – P. 98.

11. Полат Е.С. Новые педагогические и информационные технологии в системе образования. – М: Академия, 2009. – C. 272.

12. Роберт И.В. Современные информационные технологии в образовании: дидактические проблемы, перспективы использования. – М: ИИО РАО, 2010. – C. 140.

13. Абдуқодиров А.А. Ахборот технологиялари ва масофавий таълим асослари. – Тошкент: Фан, 2007. – Б. 152.

14. Муслимов Н.А. Инновацион таълим технологиялари. – Тошкент: Фан ва технология, 2015. – Б. 208.