logo
calendar18 Iyun 2022
view40
Main language:Uzbek

INFLUENCE OF SOWING METHODS AND FOLIAR FEEDING ON THE FORMATION OF ELEMENTS OF THE RICE YIELD

Field of Science:
pdf

62ad9ec177774.pdf

PDF

Пахтачилик ва дончилик илмий-амалий журнал

Пахтачилик ва дончилик илмий-амалий журнал

Publish Articlesee more

ARTICLE ANNOTATION

quote
In this article, when using the methods of manual and mechanized sowing of rice of the Lazurny variety, Kristalon 6 kg/ha and Logopuser 1 l/ha are recommended due to foliar feeding with microfertilizers for growing late varieties, reducing to 25% of the recommended rate (N180P150K150 кг/га kg/ha) and (N135P113K113 kg/ha). At the same time, compared with sowing seeds, manual sowing of rice seedlings using Logopuser 1 l/ha increased tillering by 1.79%, the total number of whole grains in the panicle was 16 pieces, the weight of grains in the panicle was by 0.59 grams and 1000 grains the weight was 0.7 grams higher. And also in the middle-ripening rice variety “Iskandar” in comparison with sowing seeds, due to the use of microelements, the names and norms of which are given above, the consumption of mineral fertilizers is reduced by 25% of the norm (N120P120K150 kg/ha), when making (N90P90K113 kg/ha), tillering was 1.83% more, the total number of whole grains in the panicle is 15 pieces, the weight of grains in the panicle is 3.58 grams, and the weight of 1000 grains is more than 0.8 grams.

AUTHORS

D.Saithanova

Шоличилик илмий - тадқиқот институти

Tags

# шоли# рис# rice# yield# fertilizer# минерал ўғит# минеральное удобрение# урожай# Iskandar# Искандар# микроэлементли ўғит# Лазурный# экиш усуллари# Kristalon# Logopuser# баргидан озиқлантириш.# микроэлементное удобрение# спо- собы посева# листовая подкормка.# micronutrient fertilizer# Lazurniy# planting methods# foliar feeding.

OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS JOURNAL

Rate Article

0
0 ratings
5
4
3
2
1

Article Identifiers

ROI:

https://eroi.uz/11.0108/A0622-0002

DOI:

Not Available

References

Дзюба В.А. Теоритическое и прикладное растениеводство: на примере пшеницы, ячменя и риса. Науч- но-методическое пособие. Краснодар, 2010. 187-446-б.

Авакян К.М., Агарков В.Д., Алексеенко Е.В. ва бошқалар. Система рисоводства –Краснодарского края. Краснодар, 2006. с. 340

Рахимов Ш. Качество зерна. Сельское хозяйство Узбекистана, 2007. с. 23

Эгамназаров А. «Шоли сувни хуш кўради». // Ўзбекистон қишлоқ хўжалиги.-Тошкент, 2005. №7. 17-б.

Ўразметов Қ.К. “Кечпишар шоли навлари ҳосилдорлигига экиш муддати ва меъёрларининг таъсири” қ.х.ф.ф.д. (PhD) дисс. Автореферати. Тошкент. 2017. 15-17-б. 45-б.

Jing Q., Bouman B., Van Keulen H., Hengsdijk H., Cao W., and T. Dai. Disentangling the effect of environmental factors on yield and nitrogen uptake of irrigated rice in Asia. Agricultural System 98 (3), 2008. p. 177-188.

Liew Y.A., Syed Omar S.R., Husni M.H.A., Zainal A.M.A and Nur Ashikin P.A. Effects of Foliar Applied Copper and Boron on Fungal Diseases and Rice Yield on Cultivar MR219. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 35 (2): р. 339-349 (2012)

Mahajan G., Kumar V., Chauhan B.S., «Rice Production in India», в Rice Production Worldwide, B. S. Chauhan, K. Jabran, и G. Mahajan, Ред. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, р. 53–91. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319- 47516-5_3.

Gautam Ambuj, et al., Effect of Varying Seed Rates and Row Spacing on Growth, Yield Attributes and Yield of Aerobic Rice. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences, 2018, Volume 10, Issue 7, p. 5788-5790.

Доспехов Б.А «Методика полевого опыта» М.: «Колос» 1985 г, с. 350-423.