logo
calendar19 Yanvar 2023
view66
Main language:Uzbek

EXPRESSION OF PRAGMATIC PURPOSE IN OFFICIAL SPEECH

Field of Science:
pdf

641467360157f.pdf

PDF

ARTICLE ANNOTATION

quote
The methods of description, comparison, contrast, generalization, and integral analysis were used to illuminate the research topic. The expression of the pragmatic purpose in the texts of official speech is proved, the pragmatic purpose of official working documents and the texts of diplomatic correspondence is proved by examples. The scientific significance of the results of the work is determined by the addition and expansion of scientific-theoretical views related to the research of theoretical issues in the field of pragmalinguistics, in particular, problems related to the linguo-pragmatic features of official speech. The practical importance of the work is that it can be used as a theoretical resource in the preparation of educational textbooks, in passing such subjects as speech culture, linguistic analysis of official text. The evidence collected in our work will serve for the preparation of monographs, textbooks, training manuals to be created on the pragmatic features of texts related to a certain official speech.

AUTHORS

SH.Asila

Fergana State University

Tags

# прагматика# pragmatics# scientific method# научный метод# pragmatika# логическая последовательность# intention# интенция# logical consistency# ilmiy uslub# rasmiy nutq# rasmiy ish hujjatlari# logik izchillik# diplomatik yozishmalar# pragmatik maqsad# intensiya# официальная речь# официальные рабочие документы# дипломатическая переписка# прагматическая цель# official speech# official working documents# diplomatic correspondence# pragmatic purpose

OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS JOURNAL

Rate Article

0
0 ratings
5
4
3
2
1

Article Identifiers

References

1. Лутфуллаева Д. Расмий иш ҳужжатлари матнида прагматик мақсаднинг ифодаланиши // Ўзбек тили ва адабиёти. 2019. №3. – 20-бет. (Lutfullaeva D. Expression of pragmatic purpose in the text of official working documents // Uzbek language and literature. 2019. No. 3. - page 20.)

2. Аминов M., Мадвалиев A., Маҳкамов Н., Маҳмудов Н. Иш юритиш. – Tошкент: “Ўзбекистон миллий энциклопедияси”, 2015. – 285-бет.( Aminov M., Madvaliev A., Mahkamov N., Mahmudov N. Business management. - Tashkent: "National Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan", 2015. - p. 285.)

3. Почепцов О.Г. Основы прагматического описания предложения. Киев: Вищашкола, 1986. С.75. (Pocheptsov O.G. Fundamentals of the pragmatic description of the proposal. Kyiv: Vishchashkola, 1986. P.75.)

4. Сафаров Ш. Прагмалингвистика. Тошкент: “Ўзбекистон миллий энциклопедияси”, 2008. - 82-бет. (Safarov Sh. Pragmalinguistics. Tashkent: "National Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan", 2008. - p. 82.)

5. Омонов Қ. Туркий расмий услубнинг юзага келиши ва такомили (илк ва ўрта асрлар). ДДА. Тошкент, 2016. 21-бет. (Omonov Q. Emergence and improvement of the Turkish formal style (early and middle ages). DDA. Tashkent, 2016. 21 p.)

6. Ҳакимов М. Ўзбек прагмалингвистикаси асослари. – Тошкент, Академнашр: 2013. (Hakimov M. Basics of Uzbek pragmalinguistics. - Tashkent, Akademnashr: 2013.)

7. Ўткир Ҳошимов, Тушда кечган умрлар. Тошкент: “Шарқ”, 1994. 2- бет. (O‘tkir Hashimov, Lives spent in a dream. Tashkent: "Sharq", 1994. 2- p.)