logo
calendar23 May 2026
view71
Main language:Uzbek

LANGUAGE POLICY AS A NATIONAL SECURITY FACTOR: THE EXPERIENCE OF MODERN STATES

Field of Science:Language and Linguistics
pdf

Mansurbek Baxtiyarov_55....pdf

PDF

ARTICLE ANNOTATION

quote
This article examines language policy as a key component of national security in contemporary states. Based on the Copenhagen Schoolʼs framework, language is analyzed as a factor closely linked to social cohesion, national identity, information-cognitive security, and state sovereignty. Language policy is analyzed not only as a linguistic process but also as an instrument of political legitimacy, domestic mobilization, and geopolitical projection. The study integrates theories of language planning, linguistic imperialism, and soft power to explain both internal and external functions of language policy. Through a comparative approach, the experiences of Uzbekistan, Russia, Kazakhstan, France, and China are examined, and major models of language policy are identified. The findings indicate that in the context of globalization and information warfare, language policy significantly affects identity stability and cognitive security. Strategic directions for strengthening language security in Uzbekistan are proposed.

AUTHORS

Science ID: BTV-0725-0007

Tags

# tilsiyosati# milliyxavfsizlik# yumshoqkuch

Rate Article

0
0 ta
5
4
3
2
1

References

Buzan B., Wæver O., de Wilde J. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. – Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998. – 239 p.

Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining “Davlat tili toʻgʻrisida”gi Qonuni. 1989-yil 21-oktabr (keyingi tahrirlari bilan) // Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Oliy Majlisining Axborotnomasi. – 1989. – № 9.

Haugen E. Language Conflict and Language Planning: The Case of Modern Norwegian. – Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1966. – 393 p.

Cooper R.L. Language Planning and Social Change. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. – 216 p.

Tollefson J.W. Planning Language, Planning Inequality: Language Policy in the Community. – London: Longman, 1991. – 234 p.