logo
calendar30 Iyun 2026
view28
Main language:Uzbek

A DIDACTIC MODEL FOR TEACHING SCHOOL GEOMETRY AND PHYSICS IN A SYNCHRONOUS AND ASYNCHRONOUS INTEGRATED MANNER WITHIN A 3D MODELING ENVIRONMENT

Field of Science:Education
pdf

Sobirova M. R._2fc7c003.pdf

PDF

Entrepreneurship and pedagogy scientific and methodical journal

Entrepreneurship and pedagogy scientific and methodical journal

Publish Articlesee more

ARTICLE ANNOTATION

quote
This article examines the issues of teaching school geometry in synchronous and asynchronous connection with physics based on 3D modeling. The study analyzes the theoretical foundations of the interdisciplinary relationship between geometry and physics, and highlights the possibilities of using 3D modeling technologies. An educational model aimed at teaching geometry in an integrated manner with physics is also proposed. This model serves to develop students' spatial imagination, facilitate the understanding of complex geometric shapes, and reinforce interdisciplinary knowledge. The research results indicate that an integrated learning process organized on the basis of 3D modeling has a positive impact on increasing educational efficiency.

AUTHORS

Science ID: DSD-0726-0004

Tags

# ta’lim# tafakkur# modellashtirish# sinxron# fizika# o‘qitish# geometriya# bog‘liqlik# fanlararo# asinxron# fazoviy# 3d# modeli

Rate Article

0
0 ratings
5
4
3
2
1

Article Identifiers

ROI:

https://eroi.uz/11.187/A026-738606

DOI:

Not Available

References

1. Papert S. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. – New York: Basic Books, 1980. – P. 252.

2. Resnick M. Lifelong Kindergarten: Cultivating Creativity through Projects, Passion, Peers, and Play. – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017. – P. 208.

3. Lesh R., Doerr H. Beyond Constructivism: Models and Modeling Perspectives on Mathematics Problem Solving, Learning, and Teaching. – Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003. – P. 624.

4. Peled I. Enhancing Geometric Thinking through Visualization and Representation // International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 1999. Vol. 30, No. 4. – P. 535-547.

5. Wieman C., Perkins K., Adams W. Oersted Medal Lecture 2007: Interactive Simulations for Teaching Physics: What Works, What Doesn’t, and Why // American Journal of Physics. 2008. Vol. 76, No. 4. – P. 393-399.

6. Mazur E. Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual. – Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997. – P. 253 p.

7. Finkelstein N., Adams W., Keller C. et al. When Learning about the Real World is Better Done Virtually: A Study of Substituting Computer Simulations for Laboratory Equipment // Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research. 2005. Vol. 1, No. 1. – P. 1-8.

8. Dewey J. Democracy and Education. – New York: Macmillan, 1916. – P. 434.

9. Beane J.A. Curriculum Integration: Designing the Core of Democratic Education. – New York: Teachers College Press, 1997. – P. 144.

10. Fogarty R. How to Integrate the Curricula. – Illinois: Skylight Publishing, 1991. – P. 98.

11. Полат Е.С. Новые педагогические и информационные технологии в системе образования. – М: Академия, 2009. – C. 272.

12. Роберт И.В. Современные информационные технологии в образовании: дидактические проблемы, перспективы использования. – М: ИИО РАО, 2010. – C. 140.

13. Абдуқодиров А.А. Ахборот технологиялари ва масофавий таълим асослари. – Тошкент: Фан, 2007. – Б. 152.

14. Муслимов Н.А. Инновацион таълим технологиялари. – Тошкент: Фан ва технология, 2015. – Б. 208.