logo
calendar10 Mart 2020
view33
Main language:English

THE AGE FACTOR IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND DIFFERENCES IN REACHING PROFICIENCY

Field of Science:
pdf

5e6767c230980.pdf

PDF

ARTICLE ANNOTATION

quote
This paper discusses the role of age in Second Language Acquisition and presents the different results of relevant researches on this topic. It also compares the results and conclusions of researches conducted by 20 scholars, linguistics and researchers. Furthermore, it explains why and when this issue began to draw attention of linguistics along with interpretating the Critical Period Hypothesis by Lenneberg ( 1967). It further aims to examine whether young L2 learners are better than adult L2 learners. Taking all research together, it concludes that even though adult second language learners may achieve particular succes in SLA especially in terms of grammar, the early age in SLA is supported considering the fact that young learners will eventually surpass adult second language learners in final stage of acquisition.

AUTHORS

G.Abdukadyrova

O’zbekiston davlat jahon tillari universiteti talabasi

M.Suyunova

O’zbekiston davlat jahon tillari universiteti talabasi

Tags

# произношение# pronunciation# CPH ( the Critical Period H# language proficiency# native-like excellency# grammatical complexity# language exposure# "Language Specific Cognitive S# "Problem-Solving Cognitive Syste# the Maturational State Hypothesi# the Exercise Hypothesis# "sensitive period"..# CPH (гипотеза критического пе# владение языком# превосходство# подобное нативному языку# грамматическая сложность# языковая экспозиция# «языковая когнитивная система»# «проблемная когнитивная систем# гипотеза состояния зрелости# гипотеза упражнения "чувствитель# TDN (Tanqidiy Davr Nazariyasi# til malakaviyligi# talaffuz# grammatik murakkablik# " Aniq Shakllangan Til Siste# "Muammoni yechish Sistemasi"# "Voyagф Yetganlik Holati Nazari# " Mashq Nazariyasi"# " Ta'sirchan Davr"..

OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS JOURNAL

Rate Article

0
0 ratings
5
4
3
2
1

Article Identifiers

References

Lenneberg, E, H. (1967). Biological Foundations Of Language Learning. New York: Wiley. p.176

Lamendella, T. (1977). General principles of neuro-functional organization and their manifestation in primary and nonprimary language acquisition. Language Learning, 27. p175

Johnson, J & E, Newport (1989). Critical period effect in language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of ESL. Cognitivr Psuchology, 21. p 64

Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. p.85

Harley, B. Age in Second Language Acquisition. Clevedon, Multilingual Matters. 1986 p.112

Singleton, D and L, Ryan Language Acquisition: Age factor. UK: Multilingual Matters. 2004. p.61

Patkowski, M “ The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language”. Language learning30/2.1980 p.73/ 89.)

Thompson, E. Foreign Accents Revisited: English Pronunciation in Russian Immigrants. Language Learning, 41. 1991. ] p.24

Weinrech, U. Language in Contact. The Hague, Netherlands, Mouton. 1953] p.35

Johnson, L & Newport, E. Critical Period Effects in Second Language Learning. The influence of Maturational State on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Pyschology.60-99.1989 p.42