DETERMINATION OF RESERVES TO REDUCE THE FREQUENCY OF CESAREAN SECTION IN THE PERINATAL CENTER USING THE ROBSON CLASSIFICATION

1. Alternative strategy to decrease cesarean section: support by doulas during labor/Trueba G. [et al.] // J. Perinatal Education.-2000.- Vol. 9, N 2.- P. 89–13. 2. Application of the Robson classification of cesarean sections in focus: Robson groups/Budhwa T. [et al.] // A report by the child health network for the greater Toronto area.- Toronto, 2010.- 60 р 3. Clark E.A. S., Silver R.M. Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery // Am.J. Obstet. Gynecol. - 2011.-Vol. 205, N 6, suppl.- P. S2–10. 4. Kealy M.A., Small R.E., Liamputtong P. Recovery after caesarean birth: a qualitative study of women’s accounts in Victoria, Australia // BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2010 URL: http: // www.biomedcentral.com/1471–2393/10/47/ 5. Мас Dorman M.F., Menacker F., Declercq E. Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes // Clin. Perinatol.- 2008.- Vol. 35, N 2.- Р. 293–307. 6. Potter J., Hopkins K., Faundes A. Women’s autonomy and scheduled cesarean sections in Brazil: a cautionary tale // Birth.- 2008.- Vol. 35.- Р. 33–40. 7. Robson M.S. Classification of caesarean sec-tions // Fetal and Maternal Мedicine Review.- 2001.- Vol. 12, N 1.-Р. 23–29.