114

This article explores the intersection of information systems and philology, highlighting the potential synergies and benefits that arise from combining these fields. This article presents case studies and discusses innovative approaches that showcase how information systems can contribute to the advancement of philology, while also discussing potential challenges and ethical considerations that arise in this interdisciplinary context. 

  • Read count 114
  • Date of publication 05-10-2023
  • Main LanguageIngliz
  • Pages202-208
English

This article explores the intersection of information systems and philology, highlighting the potential synergies and benefits that arise from combining these fields. This article presents case studies and discusses innovative approaches that showcase how information systems can contribute to the advancement of philology, while also discussing potential challenges and ethical considerations that arise in this interdisciplinary context. 

Ўзбек

Ushbu maqola axborot tizimlari va filologiyaning bir-biriga aloqador ekanligini oʻrganib, sinergiya potentsialini va ushbu sohalarni birlashtirishdan kelib chiqadigan foydalarni ta’kidlaydi. Ushbu maqolada amaliy tadqiqotlar taqdim etiladi va axborot tizimlari filologiya rivojiga qanday hissa qoʻshishi mumkinligini koʻrsatadigan innovatsion yondashuvlar, shuningdek, ushbu fanlararo kontekstda yuzaga keladigan potentsial muammolar va axloqiy mulohazalarni muhokama qiladi.    

Русский

В этой статье исследуется пересечение информационных систем и филологии, подчеркивая потенциал синергии и преимущества, возникающие в результате объединения этих областей. Здесь представлены тематические исследования и обсуждаются инновационные подходы, демонстрирующие, как информационные системы могут способствовать развитию филологии, а также обсуждаются потенциальные проблемы и этические соображения, возникающие в этом междисциплинарном контексте. 

№ Name of reference
1 Crane, G., & Terras, M. (Eds.). (2009). Changing the Center of Gravity: Transforming Classical Studies Through Cyberinfrastructure. Council on Library and Information Resources.
2 Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., & Unsworth, J. (Eds.). (2004). A Companion to Digital Humanities. John Wiley & Sons.
3 Svensson, P. (2010). Beyond the Big Tent: Different Models of Interdisciplinarity in Digital Humanities. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25(3), 273-287.
4 Koolen, M. (2016). Bridging the Gap between Information Systems and Philology: Towards a Computational Methodology for Historical Text Reuse. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 31(3), 606-624.
5 Fitzpatrick, K. (2011). Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy. NYU Press.
6 McCarty, W. (2012). Humanities Computing. Palgrave Macmillan.
7 Kenderdine, S. (2011). Data Mining the Digital Humanities: A Case Study in Macro-Etymology. Journal of Visual Culture, 10(2), 256-264.
8 Terras, M., Nyhan, J., & Vanhoutte, E. (Eds.). (2013). Defining Digital Humanities: A Reader. Ashgate Publishing.
9 Jannidis, F., Kohle, H. L., & Rehbein, M. (Eds.). (2017). Digital Humanities: Methodik in den Geisteswissenschaften. Metzler.
10 Liu, A. (2018). The Meaning of the Digital Humanities. PMLA, 133(3), 436442.
11 Berry, D. M. (2019). Digital Humanities: Knowledge and Critique in a Digital Age. John Wiley & Sons.
12 Drucker, J. (2019). Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production. Harvard University Press.
13 Vanhoutte, E. (2020). Text Mining in the Digital Humanities: A Critical Review. Journal of Documentation, 76(1), 60-79.
14 Rockwell, G., & Sinclair, S. (Eds.). (2016). Hermeneutica: ComputerAssisted Interpretation in the Humanities. MIT Press.
15 Underwood, T. (2019). Distant Horizons: Digital Evidence and Literary Change. University of Chicago Press.
Waiting