Iatrogenic keratoectasia is a form of keratoectasiathat develops as a result of medical procedures or surgical interventions on the cornea of the eye. This complication can occur after operations such as LASIK (laser vision correction), PRK (photorefractive keratectomy), implantation of intraocular lensesand other surgical procedures related to the cornea. Secondary keratoectasia is a serious ophthalmic disease that requires accurate and timely diagnosis in order to choose the optimal treatment. Modern methods of examination of the anterior segment of theeye play an important role in the diagnosis of such conditions, which makes this study relevant and significant for practical ophthalmology. Changes to the cornea can lead to decreased visual function and significant discomfort in patients. The identification and effective treatment of secondary keratoectasias requires accurate and detailed diagnosis.
Iatrogenic keratoectasia is a form of keratoectasiathat develops as a result of medical procedures or surgical interventions on the cornea of the eye. This complication can occur after operations such as LASIK (laser vision correction), PRK (photorefractive keratectomy), implantation of intraocular lensesand other surgical procedures related to the cornea. Secondary keratoectasia is a serious ophthalmic disease that requires accurate and timely diagnosis in order to choose the optimal treatment. Modern methods of examination of the anterior segment of theeye play an important role in the diagnosis of such conditions, which makes this study relevant and significant for practical ophthalmology. Changes to the cornea can lead to decreased visual function and significant discomfort in patients. The identification and effective treatment of secondary keratoectasias requires accurate and detailed diagnosis.
| № | Author name | position | Name of organisation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kasimova M.S. | ! | Department of Ophthalmology |
| 2 | KAMILOV K.M. | ! | Department of Ophthalmology |
| 3 | KHAMRAEVA G.K. | ! | Department of Ophthalmology |
| 4 | ISMAILOVA D.F. | ! | Department of Ophthalmology |
| № | Name of reference |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1.Аветисов С.Э. Кератоконус: современные подходы к изучению патогенеза, диагностике, коррекции и лечению. Вестник офтальмологии. 2014;130(6):37–43.2.Аверич В.В., Егорова Г.Б. Оптические аберрации глаза при кератоконусе. Клиническая офтальмология. 2022;22(3):168–174. https://doi.org/10.32364/2311-7729-3.2022-22-3-168-174.4.Аветисов С.Э., Новиков И.А., Патеюк Л.С. Кератоконус: этиологические факторы и сопутствующие проявления. Вестник офтальмологии. 2014;130(4):110–116.5.Абугова Т.Д., Морозов С.Г., БлосфельдВ.Б. Новые аспекты проблемы кератоконуса. Глаз. 2004;1:8–13.6.Аветисов С.Э., Аверич В.В., Патеюк Л.С. Кератоконус: основные направления исследований. Вестник офтальмологии. 2023;139(3.2):11–20. https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2023139032117.Балашевич Л. И. Некоторые особенности ранней диагностики кератоконуса / Л. И. Балашевич, А. Б. Качанов, С. А. Никулин // Материалы IVЕвро-Азиатской конференции по офтальмохирургии. Разд. II. Екатеринбург, 2006. С. 34-518.Камилов Х.М., Касимова М.С., Хамраева Г.Х., Исмаилова Д.Ф. Роль эндотелиальной микроскопии роговицы при диагностике кератоэктазии. Передовая офтальмология. 2023;1(1):87-919.Егорова Г.Б., Рогова А.Я. Кератоконус. Методы диагностики и мониторинга. Вестник офтальмологии. 2013;129(1):61–6610.Каспарова Е. А. Ранняядиагностика, лазерное и хирургическое лечение кератоконуса: автореф. дис. д-ра мед. наук / Е. А. Каспарова. М., 2003. 27 с11.Майчук, О. И. Кондакова // Современные технологии катарактальной и рефракционной хирургии: материалы ХIнауч.-практ. конф. М., 2010. C. 266-273 12.Asroui L, Mehanna CJ, Salloum A, Chalhoub RM, Roberts CJ, Awwad ST. Comparison of zone averages to single point measurements of maximal curvature in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;221(1):226-23413.Belin MW, Duncan JK. Keratoconus: the ABCD grading system. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2016;233(6):701-70714.Belin M.W., Ambrosio R.J. Scheimpfl ug imaging for keratoconus and ectatic disease. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61(8):401–406. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.11605915.Binder P.S., Lindstrom R.L., Stulting R.D. et al. Keratoconus and corneal ectasia after LASIK. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2005;21(6):749–752. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597X-20051101-1516.Duncan JK, Belin MW, Borgstrom M. Assessing progression of keratoconus: novel tomographic determinants. Eye Vis (Lond). 2016;3:617.Belin MW, Alizadeh R, Torres-Netto E, Hafezi F, Ambrósio R, Pajic BP. Determining progression in ectatic corneal disease. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2020;9(6):541-54818.Pinheiro-Costa J, Rocha-Sousa A, Falcão-Reis F, Brandão EM. Increased choroidal thickness in keratoconus patients: Perspectives in the disease pathophysiology. J Ophthalmol. 2019; 2019:24519.Gunes A, Tok L, Tok Ö, Seyrek L. The youngest patient with bilateral keratoconus caused by chronic constant eye friction. Semin Ophthalmol. 2015;30(5-6):454-45620.Gemonet M, Charpentier P, Muro F. Corneal topography in clinical practice. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2019;42(10):e439-e45121.Gomes JA, Tan D, Rapuano CJ, et al. Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases. Cornea. 2015;34(4):359-36922.McMahon TT, Anderson RJ, Joslin CE, Rosas G. Accuracy of three corneal topographic instruments in keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2001;78(8):599-60423.Randleman JB, Russell B, Ward MA, Thompson KP, Stulting RD. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(2):267-27524.Hamada S, Barua A, Caporossi A, et al. Corneal crosslinking in children. In: Sinjab MM, Cummings A, eds. Corneal Collagen Crosslinking. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2017:229-26825.Hashemi H, AtefiA, Khabazkhoob MJ. Effect of keratoconus grades on the repeatability of keratometry readings: comparison of 5 devices. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(5):1065-107226.Chan SP, Ang M, Saad A, et al. Validation of an objective screening algorithm for keratoconus and ectasia risk in Asian eyes. Cornea. 2015;34(9):996-1004 |