This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the modern mechanism for resolving international online disputes —the institution of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR). It explores the formation, development, and legal foundations of ODR, focusing on the distinctive features of Internet-based legal systems and their application in international trade, electronic commerce, and service sectors. The article includes a comparative analysis of the implementation and practices of ODR systems in the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Uzbekistan, supported by statistical data.Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures, including online arbitration processes, digital tools, online platforms, and automated case management systems integrated into judicial software, are thoroughly examined. Based on theoretical research, the article identifies the unique characteristics, legal advantages, and limitations of online arbitration from both scientific and legal perspectives.Furthermore, it presents substantiated organizational and legal solutions necessary for implementing ODR systems in Uzbekistan. The article covers the evolution of Internet-based legal systems, their role within the international arbitration framework, and their respective strengths and weaknesses. Drawing on international experience, it proposes effective solutions to current challenges and offers legal recommendations tailored to the needs of Uzbekistan
This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the modern mechanism for resolving international online disputes —the institution of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR). It explores the formation, development, and legal foundations of ODR, focusing on the distinctive features of Internet-based legal systems and their application in international trade, electronic commerce, and service sectors. The article includes a comparative analysis of the implementation and practices of ODR systems in the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, and Uzbekistan, supported by statistical data.Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures, including online arbitration processes, digital tools, online platforms, and automated case management systems integrated into judicial software, are thoroughly examined. Based on theoretical research, the article identifies the unique characteristics, legal advantages, and limitations of online arbitration from both scientific and legal perspectives.Furthermore, it presents substantiated organizational and legal solutions necessary for implementing ODR systems in Uzbekistan. The article covers the evolution of Internet-based legal systems, their role within the international arbitration framework, and their respective strengths and weaknesses. Drawing on international experience, it proposes effective solutions to current challenges and offers legal recommendations tailored to the needs of Uzbekistan
| № | Author name | position | Name of organisation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tulkinova V.. | 2nd-year student | Faculty of Criminal Justice |
| № | Name of reference |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1.Giupponi, B. O. (2022). "Chapter 3 “Virtual” Dispute Resolution in International Arbitration: Mapping Its Advantages and Main Caveats in the Face of COVID-19". In The Impact of COVID on International Disputes. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Nijhoff.p.62;2.https://viamediationcentre.org/readnews/ODY4/IS-CYBER-ARBITRATIONLEGAL;3.Vilalta, A. E. (2010). Legal framework and harmonization of ADR/ODR methods. Journal of Law and Conflict Resolution, 2(7), 103-107. Retrieved from http://www.academicjournals.org/jlcr;4.https://odr.info/new-odr-market-research-report-2024/;5.Альтернативное разрешение споров: Учебник / Под ред. Е.А. Борисовой. М: Издательский Дом «Городец». 2019;6.Margaret L. Mozes. “Xalqaro tijorat arbitraji tamoyillari va amaliyoti”. –T: “Lesson Press” MCHJ nashriyoti, 2010. –25-b;7.UNCITRAL -Birlashgan Millatlar Tashkilotining Xalqaro savdo huquqi bo'yicha komissiyasi. Uning vazifasi xalqaro savdo huquqini izchil muvofiqlashtirish va unifikatsiyalashdan iborat. Ushbu manbada: www.uncitral.org/uncitral/ en/uncitral_texts/arbitration/1985Model_arbitration_ status.html. 1985 yilgi UNSITRAL namunaviy qonuni;8.Международный коммерческий арбитраж: Учебник" 2-е издание, переработанное и дополненное под редакции Т.А. Лунаева. –М. 2018. ст.134;9.Lessig, L. (2006). "Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace." New York: Basic Books;10.Warren, S.D., and Brandeis, L.D. (1890). "The Right to Privacy." Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193-220;11.Reidenberg, J.R. (2000). "Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspace." Stanford Law Review, 52(5), 1315-1370;12.Donna Shestowsky, Procedural Preferences in Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Closer, Modern Look at an Old Idea, 10 PSYCHOL. PUB. POL’Y & L. 211, 214 (2004);13.Linda Brannack, Resolving Disputes Between Physicians & Nurses: How to Get the Most from ADR in the Health Care Industry, 56-JUL DIsp. RESOL. J. 46, 48 (2001);14.Rustambekov I.R. Xalqaro tijorat arbitraji [International commercial arbitration]. 2018, pp. 27-28;15.Rustambekov I. (2020). Some Aspects of Developmentof Private International Law in the CIS Countries. LeXonomica, 12(1), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.18690/lexonomica.12.1.27-50.2020;16.https://www.lex.uz/uz/17.http://lawlibrary.ru/18.www.lexology.com19.www.ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market20.www.harvardlawreview.org21.www.cyberlaw.stanford.edu22.https://blog.jusmundi.com/the-emergence-of-e-mediation-and-e-arbitration/ |