In the ever-evolving landscape of digital communication, the use of graphic signs has become increasingly prevalent. This article explores the significance of graphic signs in internet-based communication, focusing on their role in enhancing user engagement, conveying emotions, and transcending language barriers. Drawing upon existing literature and empirical evidence, we delve into the various forms, functions, and impacts of graphic signs in digital communication. Furthermore, we discuss potential future trends and implications for research and practice in this domain.
In the ever-evolving landscape of digital communication, the use of graphic signs has become increasingly prevalent. This article explores the significance of graphic signs in internet-based communication, focusing on their role in enhancing user engagement, conveying emotions, and transcending language barriers. Drawing upon existing literature and empirical evidence, we delve into the various forms, functions, and impacts of graphic signs in digital communication. Furthermore, we discuss potential future trends and implications for research and practice in this domain.
Raqamli muloqotning doimiy rivojlanayotgan maydonida grafik belgilardan foydalanish tobora kengayib bormoqda. Ushbu maqola Internetga asoslangan muloqotda grafik belgilarning ahamiyatini o‘rganadi, foydalanuvchilarning faolligini oshirish, his-tuyg‘ularni yetkazish va til to‘siqlarini yengib o‘tishdagi roliga e’tibor qaratadi. Mavjud adabiyotlar va dalillarga asoslanib, biz raqamli muloqotda grafik belgilarning turli shakllari, funksiyalari va ta’sirini o‘rganamiz. Bundan tashqari, biz ushbu sohadagi tadqiqot va amaliyot uchun kelajakdagi tendensiyalarni va oqibatlarini muhokama qilamiz
В постоянно развивающемся мире цифровых коммуникаций использование графических знаков становится все более распространенным. В этой статье исследуется значение графических знаков в интернет-коммуникации, уделяя особое внимание их роли в повышении вовлеченности пользователей, передаче эмоций и преодолении языковых барьеров. Опираясь на существующую литературу и эмпирические данные, мы углубляемся в различные формы, функции и влияние графических знаков в цифровой коммуникации. Кроме того, мы обсуждаем потенциальные будущие тенденции и последствия для исследований и практики в этой области
№ | Муаллифнинг исми | Лавозими | Ташкилот номи |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Komilov J.K. | ESP teacher | Kokand branch of Tashkent state technical university |
№ | Ҳавола номи |
---|---|
1 | Axrorjon o‘g‘li O.T., Dehqonov B.A., Ortiqov U.X. INGLIZ TILINI O‘QITISH VA O ‘RGANISHNI SAMARALI TASHKIL ETISHDA ZAMONAVIY TEXNOLOGIYALARDAN FOYDALANISH. Innovative Development in Educational Activities. 2023 May 30;2(10):174-8. |
2 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. |
3 | Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications. |
4 | Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Sage publications |
5 | Derks, D., Fischer, A. H., & Bos, A. E. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 766-785. |
6 | Döring, N. (2014). The Internet’s impact on sexuality: A critical review of 15 years of research. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 181-192. |
7 | Herring, S. C., & Zelenkauskaite, A. (2009). Facework and im-politeness on Facebook: Encounters in social networked publics. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(8), 1418- 1430. |
8 | Javokhir Kozimjon ugli Komilov. Process Of Forming Latin Script And Its Impact On Graphic Communication Of Internet Language. Academic Leadership- Online Journal. 2020 June 25; 5(21):124-130 |
9 | Komilov Javokhir Kozimjon ugli. “Configuration Changes of Graphic Signs in Virtual Communication”. HOLDERS OF REASON, vol. 1, no. 3, Dec. 2023, pp. 369-77, https://sciencepromotion.uz/index.php/HOLDERS_OF_REASON/article/view/93. |
10 | Komilov Javokhir Kozimjon ugli. “The Role of Graphic Language to Increase Seismic Safety of Residential Buildings and Social Objects”. Science Promotion, vol. 1, no. 1, Jan. 2024, pp. 317-28, https://sciencepromotion.uz/index.php/sp/article/view/983 |
11 | Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications. |
12 | Miller, T., Aragon, C. R., & Kross, E. (2020). Comparing emoji usage across cultures at different levels of development. PLOS ONE, 15(8), e0236810. |
13 | Milner, R. M. (2016). Pop polyvocality: Internet memes, public participation, and the Occupy Wall Street movement. International Journal of Communication, 10, 24 |
14 | Muzny, G., Li, Y., & Joinson, A. N. (2018). Conversations gone viral: Characterizing and predicting viral thread conversations on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 1-9 |
15 | Novak, P. K., Smailović, J., Sluban, B., & Mozetič, I. (2015). Sentiment of emojis. PLOS ONE, 10(12), e0144296 |
16 | Ortikov U. AGE-RELATED FACTORS IN THE SUCCESSFUL ATTAINMENT OF ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES (ESP). Science Promotion. 2023;1(1):297-301 |
17 | Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in digital culture. MIT Press |
18 | Vandekerckhove, M., & Panksepp, J. (2009). The flow of anoetic to noetic and autonoetic consciousness: A vision of unknowing (anoetic) and knowing (noetic) consciousness in the remembrance of things past and imagined futures. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(4), 1018-1028 |
19 | Xu, Y., & Tan, Y. (2020). A picture is worth a thousand words: The impact of emoji on engagement in social media. Telematics and Informatics, 55, 101468. |
20 | Ҳакимов А. ЦИВИЛИЗАЦИЯ ТУШУНЧАСИ ВА УНИНГ ГНОСЕОЛОГИК МОҲИЯТИ. Ижтимоий-гуманитар фанларнинг долзарб муаммолари/Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук.2023 й188- 192 бетлар. |
21 | Шарипова Н. А. Ўзбекистон таълим тизими интеграцияси ва педагогика йўналишидаги ўқув юртларининг шаклланиш тарихи //Science Promotion. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 1. – С. 34-40. |