Maqolada moliyaviy jihatdan yuqori natijaga ega korxonalarning, yuqori institutsional boshqaruv reytingiga ega ekanligini o‘rganildi. Ushbu jarayonda korxonalarning moliyaviy natijalarini aks ettiruvchi likvidlik koeffitsiyentlari, moliyaviy tuzilma koeffitsiyentlari, faoliyat ko‘rsatkichlari va rentabellik koeffitsiyentlari qo‘llanildi. Kompaniyalarning ishlash reytingida yuqori o‘rinlarni egallashi uchun barcha ko‘rsatkichlar optimallashtirilishi va mos ravishda boshqarilishi kerak. Ushu optimal yechimlarini aniqlash uchun ko‘p mezonli qaror qabul qilish usullari tahlil qilindi. Bu mezonlar asosida kompaniyalarga eng yaxshi alternativni tanlash uchun taklif va tavsiyalar berildi.
Maqolada moliyaviy jihatdan yuqori natijaga ega korxonalarning, yuqori institutsional boshqaruv reytingiga ega ekanligini o‘rganildi. Ushbu jarayonda korxonalarning moliyaviy natijalarini aks ettiruvchi likvidlik koeffitsiyentlari, moliyaviy tuzilma koeffitsiyentlari, faoliyat ko‘rsatkichlari va rentabellik koeffitsiyentlari qo‘llanildi. Kompaniyalarning ishlash reytingida yuqori o‘rinlarni egallashi uchun barcha ko‘rsatkichlar optimallashtirilishi va mos ravishda boshqarilishi kerak. Ushu optimal yechimlarini aniqlash uchun ko‘p mezonli qaror qabul qilish usullari tahlil qilindi. Bu mezonlar asosida kompaniyalarga eng yaxshi alternativni tanlash uchun taklif va tavsiyalar berildi.
| № | Муаллифнинг исми | Лавозими | Ташкилот номи |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ismoilova G.K. | o‘qituvchisi | Farg‘ona politexnika instituti |
| № | Ҳавола номи |
|---|---|
| 1 | O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining “2019-2021 yillarda O‘zbekiston Respublikasini innovatsion rivojlantirish strategiyasini tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida”gi PF-5544- son Farmoni, 21.09.2018 y. https://lex.uz/ru/docs/3913188 |
| 2 | Adekunle S.A., and Aghedo E. M. Corporate Governance and Financial Performance of Selected Listed Companies in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management, 2014. 6(9), pp. 53-60 |
| 3 | Berthelot S., Morris T., and Morrill C. Corporate governance ratings and financial performance: A Canadian study. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 2010. 10(5), pp. 635-646. |
| 4 | Brown L.D. and Caylor M.L. Corporate governance and firm performance, 2004. |
| 5 | Çatikkaş Ö. Principles of Corporate Governance. Marmara University Continuing Education Center. Retrieved October 28, 2016. |
| 6 | ÇonkarK., Elitaş, C. and Atar, G. ISE Corporate Governance Index-Topsis Financial Performance Management of Companies in Turkey (XKURY) with Subject Measurement and Analysis with Institutional Governance Note. Faculty Journal of Economics, 2011. 61 (1), pp. 81-115. |
| 7 | Dashti Z., Pedram M.M. and Shanbehzadeh J. Multiple Criticism - A Decision-Based Method for Ranking Sequential Procedures. In Proceedings of the International Multi-Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists (Volume 1) 2010. |
| 8 | Demirgünesh K. Financial Determinants of Firm Value: An Empirical Analysis. Kastamonu University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 2016. - 159-179 p. |
| 9 | Drobetz, W., Schillhofer, A. and Zimmermann, H. Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: 2003. |
| 10 | Gersil M. and Palamutcuglu T. Comparison of Topsis Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method and Weighting Methods in Evaluating Financial Performance of Technology Companies Listed on BIST. Izmir SMMMO Solidarity Journal. - 2012. |
| 11 | Huang V., and Huang Y.Y. Research on the Performance Evaluation of Chongqing Electricity Supply Bureaus Based on TOPSIS. Energy Process , 14, 2012. 899-905 p. |
| 12 | Kir C. and Gulpınar V. The Effect of Corporate Governance Principles on Financial Performance in Turkey. Journal of Policy, Echo and Management Research, 2015. 3(3), pp. 53-69. |
| 13 | Musaeva J. K., Elmurodov S. S., Yuldasheva S. N. Role of currency relations in the development of the economy of Uzbekistan //Бенефициар. – 2019. – №. 44. – С. 22-25. |
| 14 | Özdağoğlu A. Normalization techniques in multi-criteria decision-making models, 2013. |
| 15 | Ozdemir, T. TOPSIS. Lighting, BF, and Leader, TO. (Ed.). Multiple Criteria Don't Decide Methods, 2014. (133-153). Bursa: Dora Printing - publishing Distribution. |
| 16 | Suyunov D. Korporativ boshqaruv mexanizmi: muammo va yechimlar. Monografiya. – T.: Аkademiya, 2007. – 319 b. |
| 17 | Turon G. Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Yildirim, BF and Önder, E. (Eds.). Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods Bursa: Dora Publishing House Distribution, - 2014. |
| 18 | Uzuk S., Kazan H. Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods AHP TOPSIS and PROMETHEE Comparison: Selection of Main Machines in Shipbuilding Application. Journal of Transport Logistics, 2016. 99-113. |
| 19 | Zaynutdinov Sh.N. Globalization: Realities and Prospects/ The Current. Global Trends.Vol 3, No1, 2015. - P. 1-5. |
| 20 | Беркинов Б. Корпоративная структура (Основы менеджмента). - Т.: Изд-во Нац.б-ки Узбекистана, 2005. – 132 с. |
| 21 | Дементьева А.Г. Современные проблемы менеджмента. Монография. Раздел-3, Стр. 244-259. |
| 22 | Леванова Л.Н. “Теория корпоративного управления” учебно-методочиское пособие. Саратов: 2011. Стр 171. |
| 23 | Хамидулин М.Б. Финансовый механизм корпоративного управления. Монография. - Т.: Финансы, 2008. – 204 с. |
| 24 | http://www.borsaistanbul.com/endeksler/ |
| 25 | http://www.tkyd.org/tr/sss |
| 26 | www.kgk.gov.tr/contents |