2026-2-SON.-38-46_6717d17f.pdf
Science ID: FQD-0126-0001
Проблемы современной филологии · 21 Sentabr 2026
Проблемы современной филологии · 17 Sentabr 2026
Проблемы современной филологии · 17 Sentabr 2026
INFOLIB–ИНФОРМАЦИОННЫЙ-БИБЛИОТЕЧНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ УЗБЕКИСТАНА · 10 Sentabr 2026
INFOLIB–ИНФОРМАЦИОННЫЙ-БИБЛИОТЕЧНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ УЗБЕКИСТАНА · 10 Sentabr 2026
INFOLIB–ИНФОРМАЦИОННЫЙ-БИБЛИОТЕЧНЫЙ ЖУРНАЛ УЗБЕКИСТАНА · 9 Sentabr 2026
Социальные науки · 2 Sentabr 2026
Социальные науки · 2 Sentabr 2026
Социальные науки · 2 Sentabr 2026
Социальные науки · 2 Sentabr 2026
Социальные науки · 2 Sentabr 2026
Социальные науки · 2 Sentabr 2026
UNESCO. Declaration of Principles on Tolerance. Paris, 1995. https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/declaration-principles-tolerance
Forst R. Toleration in Conflict: Past and Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Walzer M. On Toleration. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.
Marcuse H. Repressive Tolerance. In: Wolff R. P., Moore B., Marcuse H. A Critique of Pure Tolerance. Boston: Beacon Press, 1965. P. 81–117.
Brown W. Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.
Popper K. R. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge, 1945.
Tajfel H., Turner J. C. An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In: Austin W. G., Worchel S. (eds.). The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1979. P. 33–47.
Lyubykh Z., Alonso N., Turner N. Beyond Allies and Recipients: Exploring Observers’ Allyship Emulation in Response to Leader Allyship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2024;181:104308. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2023.104308.
Funk M., Hartmann S., Newman A. Workplace Allyship: An Integrative Review and Agenda for Future Research. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2026:1–35. doi:10.1002/job.70104.
O’Reilly C., Mannion S., Maher P. J. et al. Strategic Attitude Expressions as Identity Performance and Identity Creation in Interaction. Communications Psychology. 2024;2:27. doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00076-7.
Brady W. J., McLoughlin K., Doan T. N., Crockett M. J. How Social Learning Amplifies Moral Outrage Expression in Online Social Networks. Science Advances. 2021;7:eabe5641. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abe5641.
Brady W. J., McLoughlin K. L., Torres M. P. et al. Overperception of Moral Outrage in Online Social Networks Inflates Beliefs about Intergroup Hostility. Nature Human Behaviour. 2023;7:917–927. doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01582-0.
Cinelli M., De Francisci Morales G., Galeazzi A. et al. The Echo Chamber Effect on Social Media. PNAS. 2021;118(9):e2023301118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2023301118.
Rathje S., Van Bavel J. J., van der Linden S. Out-group Animosity Drives Engagement on Social Media. PNAS. 2021;118(26):e2024292118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2024292118.
Lerman K., Feldman D., He Z., Rao A. Affective Polarization and Dynamics of Information Spread in Online Networks. npj Complexity. 2024;1:8. doi:10.1038/s44260-024-00008-w.
Kyrychenko Y., Brik T., van der Linden S., Roozenbeek J. Social Identity Correlates of Social Media Engagement before and after the 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine. Nature Communications. 2024;15:8127. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-52179-8.
Lorenz-Spreen P., Oswald L., Lewandowsky S. et al. A Systematic Review of Worldwide Causal and Correlational Evidence on Digital Media and Democracy. Nature Human Behaviour. 2023;7:74–101. doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1.
Gauthier G., Hodler R., Widmer P., Zhuravskaya E. The Political Effects of X’s Feed Algorithm. Nature. 2026;652:416–423. doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10098-2.
Ibrahim H., Jang H. D., Aldahoul N. et al. Systematic Partisan Content Skews in TikTok during the 2024 US Elections. Nature. 2026;654:1004–1011. doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10447-1.
Bor A., Marie A., Pradella L., Petersen M. B. Social Media Users Experience More Political Hostility in Less Economically Equal and Less Democratic Societies. Nature Human Behaviour. 2026;10:1083–1093. doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02432-5.
Piccardi T., Saveski M., Jia C. et al. Reranking Partisan Animosity in Algorithmic Social Media Feeds Alters Affective Polarization. Science. 2025;390:eadu5584. doi:10.1126/science.adu5584.
Gennaro G., Derksen L., Abdelrahman A. et al. Counterspeech Encouraging Users to Adopt the Perspective of Minority Groups Reduces Hate Speech and Its Amplification on Social Media. Scientific Reports. 2025;15:22018. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-05041-w.
UNESCO. Guidelines for the Governance of Digital Platforms. Paris, 2023. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387339
UNESCO. Media and Information Literacy: Combating Hate Speech in the Digital Age. Paris, 2026. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000398298
United Nations. United Nations Global Principles for Information Integrity. New York, 2024. https://www.un.org/en/information-integrity/global-principles
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Konstitutsiyasi. Yangi tahrir. 2023. https://constitution.uz
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2025-yil 19-martdagi PF-52-son Farmoni “Umummilliy totuvlik va xorijdagi vatandoshlar bilan aloqalarni mustahkamlashni yangi bosqichga olib chiqishga oid chora-tadbirlar to‘g‘risida”. https://lex.uz/docs/-7438950
O‘zbekiston Respublikasining 2025-yil 25-fevraldagi O‘RQ-1037-son Qonuni bilan tasdiqlangan diniy sohadagi davlat siyosati konsepsiyasi. https://lex.uz/docs/-7404923
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2023-yil 11-sentabrdagi PF-158-son Farmoni “O‘zbekiston–2030 strategiyasi to‘g‘risida”. https://lex.uz/docs/-6600413