A systematic and integrative reviews as the types of analytical information products are studied. The presented data on the publications dynamics of systematic and integrative reviews showed their high relevance as analytical information products, especially in the field of medicine, biochemistry, social sciences.
The essential comparative analysis of the concepts «systematic review», «integrative review» has shown that these types of reviews have both common features (generalization, synthesis, combining data from primary sources on the review topic, scientific methods of data evaluation and methods of information analysis, scientifically based conclusions) and distinctive features (data source selection strategy, methods to assess data, nature of conclusions and others). Their knowledge can increase the involvement of library staff in preparing these types of reviews.
It is shown how research libraries could participate in these processes in the framework of their scientific and information activities. Thus, libraries can expand their list of analytical information products and services that they provide to scientists and specialists.
A systematic and integrative reviews as the types of analytical information products are studied. The presented data on the publications dynamics of systematic and integrative reviews showed their high relevance as analytical information products, especially in the field of medicine, biochemistry, social sciences.
The essential comparative analysis of the concepts «systematic review», «integrative review» has shown that these types of reviews have both common features (generalization, synthesis, combining data from primary sources on the review topic, scientific methods of data evaluation and methods of information analysis, scientifically based conclusions) and distinctive features (data source selection strategy, methods to assess data, nature of conclusions and others). Their knowledge can increase the involvement of library staff in preparing these types of reviews.
It is shown how research libraries could participate in these processes in the framework of their scientific and information activities. Thus, libraries can expand their list of analytical information products and services that they provide to scientists and specialists.
Изучаются систематический и интегративный обзоры как виды обзорно-
аналитических продуктов. На основе анализа публикаций показано, что особое внимание при создании этих видов обзоров уделяется методике их подготовки. Проводится анализ динамики документопотока по систематическим и интегративным обзорам, который позволил показать распределение обзоров по отраслям знания, организациям, принимающим участие в написании систематических и интегративных обзоров, и выявить определенные тенденции в развитии данного вопроса. Дается сущностный анализ понятий «систематический обзор», «интегративный обзор». Проведенный сравнительный анализ систематического, интегративного и аналитического обзоров показал, что эти виды обзоров имеют как общие черты (обобщение, синтез, объединение данных из первоисточников по теме обзора, научность методов оценки данных и способов информационного анализа, научно обоснованные выводы), так и отличительные особенности (стратегия отбора источников данных, методы оценки данных, характер выводов и др.). Показано, как научные библиотеки могли бы участвовать в подготовке систематических и интегративных обзоров в рамках своей научно-информационной деятельности.
| № | Имя автора | Должность | Наименование организации |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pleshakova M.. | State Public Scientific | Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences |
| 2 | Kalyuzhnaya T.. | State Public Scientific | Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences |
| № | Название ссылки |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1. Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz G (2001) Systematic reviews in health care. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge |
| 2 | 2. Kitchenham B et al. (2009) Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – a systematic literature review. Inform Software Tech 51(1): pp 7–15 |
| 3 | 3. Kitchenham B (2007) Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. EBSE Technical Report, Keele University & Department of Computer Science University of Durhamm |
| 4 | 4. Knafl KA, Webster DC (1988) Managing and analyzing qualitative data: a description of tasks, techniques, and materials. Western Journal of Nursing Research 10: 195–210 |
| 5 | 5. Kotel’nikov GP & Shpigel’ AS (2000) Sistematicheskie obzory i meta-analiz. Dokazatel’naya medicina. Nauchno-obosnovannaya medicinskaya praktika (pp. 87–93). Samara: SamGMU. (In Russ.) |
| 6 | 6. Lau J, John PA, Christopher HS (1997) Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 127(9): 820–826 |
| 7 | 7. Littell Julia H, Corcoran Jacqueline, Pillai Vijayan (2008) Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Oxford University Press |
| 8 | 8. Petticrew M (2001) Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: Myths and misconceptions. British Medical Journal |
| 9 | 9. Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR, Sheldon TA, Song F (1998) Systematic reviews of trials and other studies. Health Technology Assessment 2 (19) |
| 10 | 10. Torgerson CJ (2003) Systematic Reviews. Continuum, London |
| 11 | 11. Whittemore R (2005) Combining Evidence in Nursing Research. Nursing Research 54 (1): 56–62. DOI: 10.1097/00006199-200501000-00008 |
| 12 | 12. Russell CL (2005) An overview of the integrative research review. Progress in transplantation 15(1): 8–13. DOI: 10.7182/prtr.15.1.0n13660r26g725kj |
| 13 | 13. Tavares de Souza Marcela, Dias da Silva Michelly, Rachel de Carvalho (2010) Integrative review: what is it? How to do it? Einstein 8 (1). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1679-45082010rw1134 |
| 14 | 14. Whittemore R, Knafl K (2005) The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing 52 (5): 546–553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x |
| 15 | 15. Conn VS, Valentine JC, Cooper HM, Rantz MJ (2003) Grey literature in meta-analyses. Nursing Research 52: 256–261 |
| 16 | 16. Jackson G (1980) Methods for integrative reviews. Review of Educational Research 50: 438–460 |
| 17 | 17. Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA |
| 18 | 18. Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA |
| 19 | 19. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (1998) Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA |
| 20 | 20. Green KE, Taylor CA, Torgerson C (2012) An overview of systematic reviews in medical education and a focused review in prescribing. Effective Education 4(2): 147–167 |
| 21 | 21. Monasta L, Batty GD, Cattaneo A, Lutje V, Ronfani L, Van Lenthe FJ (2010) Early-life determinants of overweight and obesity: a review of systematic reviews. Obes Rev 11 (10): 695–708 |
| 22 | 22. Borrego A, Ardanuy J, Urbano C (2018) Librarians as Research Partners: Their Contribution to the Scholarly Endeavour Beyond Library and Information Science. Journal of Academic Librarianship 44, 5: 663–670. DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2018.07.012 |
| 23 | 23. Brettle A (2009) Systematic Reviews and Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 4, 1: 43–50 |
| 24 | 24. Harris MR (2005) The librarian’s roles in the systematic review process: a case study. Journal of the Medical Library Association 93, 1: 81–87 |
| 25 | 25. Ke Q, Cheng Y (2015) Applications of meta-analysis to library and information science research: Content analysis. Library & Information Science Research 37, 4: 370–382. DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2015.05.004 |
| 26 | 26. Koufogiannakis D (2012) The State of Systematic Reviews in Library and Information Studies Comment. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 7 (2): 91–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/B8Q021 |
| 27 | 27. Koufogiannakis D, Crumley E (2006) Research in librarianship: issues to consider. Library Hi Tech 24, 3: 324–340. DOI: 10.1108/07378830610692109 |
| 28 | 28. McKibbon KA (2006) Systematic reviews and librarians. Library trends 55: 202–215. DOI: 10.1353/lib.2006.0049 |
| 29 | 29. Phelps SF, Campbell N (2012) Systematic reviews in theory and practice for library and information studies. Library and Information Research 36, 112: 6–15 |
| 30 | 30. Smith JT (1996) Meta-Analysis: The Librarian as a Member of an Interdisciplinary Research Team. Library Trends 45 (2): 265–279 |
| 31 | 31. Wilson V (2016) Research methods: systematic reviews. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 11, 1(S): 60–62. DOI: 10,18438 / B8M324 |
| 32 | 32. Xu J, Kang Q, Song Z (2015) The current state of systematic reviews in library and information studies. Library & Information Science Research 37, 4: 296–310. DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2015.11.003 |
| 33 | 33. StudopediYA. (2014) Sopostavlenie dokazatel’stv. Retrieved July 10, 2018, from https://studopedia.info/3-5235.html. (In Russ.) |
| 34 | 34. Vlasov VV (2005) Ostorozhno chelovek! Sistematicheskij obzor kak sredstvo ot opasnyh vmeshatel’stv. CHelovek, 3, 121–129. (In Russ.) |
| 35 | 35. Broome ME (1993) Integrative literature reviews for the development of concepts. Concept Development in Nursing. In: Rodgers BL, Knafl KA (eds) W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia |
| 36 | 36. Cooper HM (1984) The Integrative Research Review: A systematic approach. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif |
| 37 | 37. Jadad AR, Moher D, Klassen TP (1998) Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews: II. How did the authors find the studies and assess their quality? Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine 152: 812–817 |
| 38 | 38. Smith JТ, Smith MC, Stullenbarger E, Foote A (1994) Integrative review and meta-analysis: An application. Medical Reference Services Quarterly 13 (1): 57–72 |
| 39 | 39. Vinogradov VA (1978) Obshchestvennye nauki i informaciya. Moskva: Nauka. (In Russ.) |
| 40 | 40. Grechihin, A. A., & Zdorov, I. G. (1979). Informacionnye izdaniya: osnovnye osobennosti i trebovaniya. Moskva: Kniga |
| 41 | 41. Dokazatel’naya medicina. Sistematicheskie obzory. Metaanaliz. (2017). Retrieved May 15, 2017, from http://zodorov.ru/dokazatelenaya-medicina-sistematicheskie-obzori-metaanaliz.html. (In Russ.) |
| 42 | 42. Chernyj YU (2008) Shkola nauchnoj informacii. Lekciya 4. Dokumental’nye istochniki informacii. Vtorichnye dokumenty i izdaniya (chast’ 1). Retrieved July 10, 2018, from http://archive.bogoslov.ru/text/316300.html (In Russ.) |
| 43 | 43. Starikova LN (1998) Informacionnoe obespechenie sociologicheskogo obrazovaniya: resursy, tekhnologii. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat. (In Russ.) |
| 44 | 44. Lavrik OL & Kalyuzhnaya TA (2000) Internet kak istochnik informacii dlja podgotovki nauchnogo obzora. In Optimizacija informacionno-bibliograficheskogo obsluzhivanija uchenih i specialistov (pp. 51–57). Novosibrsk. (In Russ.) |