Ushbu maqolada raqamli tergov amaliyotiga qarshi qo’llaniladigan anti-kriminalistik vositalar tushunchasining ilmiy va nazariy tavsifi tahlil qilingan. Bunda anti-kriminalistik vositalarning ma’lum potensial dalillarga yetkazishi mumkin zararlar, ularning qo’llanish maqsadlari va usullariga ko’ra tavsiflash masalalari ko’rib chiqilgan. Shuningdek, ushbu maqola raqamli kriminalistika amaliyotchisining raqamli ma’lumotlarni to’g’ri tiklash va sharhlash qobiliyatini buzishi mumkin bo’lgan jarayonlarga e’tibor berish zarur bo’lgan, mutaxassisni chalg’ituvchi jihatlari bayon qilingan.
Ushbu maqolada raqamli tergov amaliyotiga qarshi qo’llaniladigan anti-kriminalistik vositalar tushunchasining ilmiy va nazariy tavsifi tahlil qilingan. Bunda anti-kriminalistik vositalarning ma’lum potensial dalillarga yetkazishi mumkin zararlar, ularning qo’llanish maqsadlari va usullariga ko’ra tavsiflash masalalari ko’rib chiqilgan. Shuningdek, ushbu maqola raqamli kriminalistika amaliyotchisining raqamli ma’lumotlarni to’g’ri tiklash va sharhlash qobiliyatini buzishi mumkin bo’lgan jarayonlarga e’tibor berish zarur bo’lgan, mutaxassisni chalg’ituvchi jihatlari bayon qilingan.
| № | Имя автора | Должность | Наименование организации |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karimov B.. | O’qituvchi | Toshkent davlat yuridik universiteti Toshkent, O’zbekiston |
| № | Название ссылки |
|---|---|
| 1 | Pajek, P. and Pimenidis, E., Computer anti-forensics methods and their impact on computer forensic investigation. In International Conference on Global Security, Safety, and Sustainability. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2009, September. pp. 145-155 Carriyer (2006) The Sleuth Kit [online] http://www.sleuthkit.org/index.php https://www.linux.com/news/sandstorm-launches-netintercept-11-freebsd-forensics-and-analysis-tool/ Ushbu vositalarga tarmoq trafigi, TEMP maʼlumotlari, Web barouzer seanslari, Clipboard malumotlari va h.k.kiradi Li u and Brown (2006), “Bleeding-Edge Anti-Forensics,” Infosec World Conference & Expo, MIS Training Institute. Buskrik and Liu (2006), “Digital Evidence: Challenging the Presumption of Reliability”, Journal of Digital Forensic Practice, 1:19—26, 2006. Conlan, K., Baggili, I. and Breitinger, F., 2016. Anti-forensics: Furthering digital forensic sciyence through a new extended, granular taxonomy. Digital investigation, 18, pp. S66-S75. Al Fahdi, M., Clarke, N.L. and Furnell, S.M., 2013, August. Challenges to digital forensics: A survey of researchers & practitioners attitudes and opinions. In Information Security for South Africa, 2013 (pp. 1-8). Said, H., Al Mutawa, N., Al Awadhi, I. and Guimaraes, M., Forensic analysis of private browsing artifacts. In Innovations in information technology (IIT), International conference on. 2011, April. pp. 197-202. Al Fahdi, M., Clarke, N.L. and Furnell, S.M., 2013, August. Challenges to digital forensics: A survey of researchers & practitioners attitudes and opinions. In Information Security for South Africa, 2013 (pp. 1-8). Kessler, G.C., Anti-forensics and the digital investigator. In Australian Digital Forensics Conference. 2007, March. p. 1. . Harris, R. (2006). Arriving at an Anti-Forensics Consensus: Examining How to Define and Control the Anti-Forensics Problem. Proceedings of the 2006 Digital Forensics Research Workshop. Digital Investigation, 3(S), S44-S49. Retrieved September 11, 2007, from http://dfrws.org/2006/proceedings/6-Harris.pdf Park, K.J., Park, J.M., Kim, E.J., Cheon, C.G. and James, J.I., Anti-Forensic Trace Detection in Digital Forensic Triage Investigations. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, 12(1), 2017. p.8. Garfinkel, S., 2007, March. Anti-forensics: Techniques, detection and countermeasures. In 2nd International Conference on i-Warfare and Security (Vol. 20087, pp. 77-84). Абдуллаев , Р. 2022. Проведение осмотра места происшествия с использованием передовых технологий. Общество и инновации. 3, 9/S (окт. 2022), 184–188. DOI:https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss9/S-pp184-188. Абдуллаев Рустам (2020). ПРАВОВЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ СБОРА И ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЯ ЦИФРОВЫХ ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВ В УГОЛОВНОМ СУДОПРОИЗВОДСТВЕ. Review of law sciences, 3 (Спецвыпуск), 240-244. doi: 10.24412/2181-919X-2020-3-240-244 Abdullaev, R. (2023). JINOYATLARNI TERGOV QILISHDA ZAMONAVIY TEXNOLOGIYALARDAN FOYDALANISH. Theoretical Aspects in the Formation of Pedagogical Sciences, 2(9), 89–92. извлечено от http://www.econferences.ru/index.php/tafps/article/view/5983 Khamidov, B. K., & Ganiyev, O. T. (2022). DIGITAL FOOTPRINTS AND SOME QUESTIONS RELATED TO THEIR FORENSIC RESEARCH. Herald pedagogiki. Nauka i Praktyka, 2(4). |