Ushbu maqolada investitsiya faoliyatini yuritishda xalqaro va mahalliy investorlarga nisbatan O`zbekiston Respublikasidagi normalar asosi hamda xalqaro miqyosda tan olingan adolatli va teng muomala siyosatini yuritish zarurati qanchalik ahamiyatliligi, uning rejim darajalarini, odat huquqi bilan o‘zaro ta’sir darajalari qanday ekanligi, O‘zbekistonning milliy qonunchilik tizimi, xalqaro urf-odatlar, xalqaro darajadagi ikki tomonlama va ko‘p tomonlama shartnomalar asosida tahliliy o‘rganilgan. O`zbekiston Respublikasida xalqaro investitsiya huquqida adolatli va teng muomala rejimi xorijiy va mahalliy investitsiyalar o’rtasida salbiy diskriminatsiyani, davlatlarning proteksionizm siyosatini oldini olish, xorijiy va mahalliy investitsiyalar uchun teng raqobat muhiti yaratish, xorijiy investorlar manfaatlarini himoya qilish kabi ko`zlangan maqsadlar qay darajada amalda o`z ifodasini topganligi haqida hamda O`zbekiston Respublikasida xalqaro investitsiya huquqida adolatli va teng munosabatda bo`lishning qo`llash sohasi va qo`llanilishi, Fair and Equitable Treatment – FET rejimi oddiy xalqaro huquqda mavjud muomilaning xalqaro minimal rejimini aks ettiradimi yoki u odatiy xalqaro odat huquqiga qo`shimcha bo`lib shartnoma orqali takrorlashni talab qilishi haqidagi qizg`in muhokamalar haqida so`z yuritilgan. Investitsiya faoliyati uchun zaruriy ahamiyatga ega bo`lgan omillardan biri adolatli va teng muomala siyosati ekanligidan kelib chiqib, tanqidiy xulosa va takliflar berib o‘tilgan.
Ushbu maqolada investitsiya faoliyatini yuritishda xalqaro va mahalliy investorlarga nisbatan O`zbekiston Respublikasidagi normalar asosi hamda xalqaro miqyosda tan olingan adolatli va teng muomala siyosatini yuritish zarurati qanchalik ahamiyatliligi, uning rejim darajalarini, odat huquqi bilan o‘zaro ta’sir darajalari qanday ekanligi, O‘zbekistonning milliy qonunchilik tizimi, xalqaro urf-odatlar, xalqaro darajadagi ikki tomonlama va ko‘p tomonlama shartnomalar asosida tahliliy o‘rganilgan. O`zbekiston Respublikasida xalqaro investitsiya huquqida adolatli va teng muomala rejimi xorijiy va mahalliy investitsiyalar o’rtasida salbiy diskriminatsiyani, davlatlarning proteksionizm siyosatini oldini olish, xorijiy va mahalliy investitsiyalar uchun teng raqobat muhiti yaratish, xorijiy investorlar manfaatlarini himoya qilish kabi ko`zlangan maqsadlar qay darajada amalda o`z ifodasini topganligi haqida hamda O`zbekiston Respublikasida xalqaro investitsiya huquqida adolatli va teng munosabatda bo`lishning qo`llash sohasi va qo`llanilishi, Fair and Equitable Treatment – FET rejimi oddiy xalqaro huquqda mavjud muomilaning xalqaro minimal rejimini aks ettiradimi yoki u odatiy xalqaro odat huquqiga qo`shimcha bo`lib shartnoma orqali takrorlashni talab qilishi haqidagi qizg`in muhokamalar haqida so`z yuritilgan. Investitsiya faoliyati uchun zaruriy ahamiyatga ega bo`lgan omillardan biri adolatli va teng muomala siyosati ekanligidan kelib chiqib, tanqidiy xulosa va takliflar berib o‘tilgan.
In this article, the basis of norms in the Republic of Uzbekistan for international and local investors and the need to conduct an internationally recognized policy of fair and equal treatment in the conduct of investment activities, its standard levels, the levels of interaction with customary law, The national legal system of Uzbekistan, international traditions, international bilateral and multilateral agreements were studied analytically. To what extent does the regime of fair and equal treatment in international investment law in the Republic of Uzbekistan prevent negative discrimination between foreign and domestic investments, protectionist policies of states, create an equal competitive environment for foreign and domestic investments, and protect the interests of foreign investors? about its expression in practice and the scope and application of fair and equal treatment in international investment law in the Republic of Uzbekistan, whether the Fair and Equitable Treatment - FET regime reflects the international minimum standard of treatment existing in ordinary international law or it heated discussions about the fact that, in addition to customary international customary law, it requires repetition through a treaty. Based on the fact that one of the factors necessary for investment activity is the policy of fair and equal treatment, critical conclusions and suggestions were given.
№ | Имя автора | Должность | Наименование организации |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Eshmurodova Z.S. | talaba | Toshkent davlat yuridik universiteti |
№ | Название ссылки |
---|---|
1 | 1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 11.04.2005-yildagi 3594-sonli “To‘g‘ridan to‘g‘ri xususiy xorijiy investitsiyalarni jalb etishni rag‘batlantirish borasidagi qo‘shimcha chora-tadbirlar to‘g‘risida”gi Farmoni. Qonun hujjatlari ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi, 28.09.2020-y., 06/20/6075/1330-son. |
2 | 2. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining “Investitsiyalar va investitsiya faoliyati to‘g‘risida”gi 25.12.2019-yildagi 598-sonli Qonuni. Qonunchilik ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi, 31.12.2022-y., 03/22/812/1145-son. |
3 | 3. FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II https://unctad.org/en/Docs/unctaddiaeia2011d5_en.pdf |
4 | 4. Handbook on Obligations in International Investment Treaties, APEC Committee on Trade and Investment (CTI). |
5 | 5. OECD (2004), “Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law”, OECD Working Papers on International Investment, 2004/03, OECD Publishing. |
6 | 6. Xalqaro investitsiya huquqiga kirish: Devid Kollins (David Collins), Narziyev Otabek Sa`diyevich. – T,: TDYU nashriyoti, 2023. 456 b. |
7 | 7. 7.https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute settlement/cases/441/oxus-gold-v-uzbekistan |
8 | 8. Kurtz, The Merits and Limits of Comparativism: National Treatment in International Investment Law and the WTO (n 102). See also UPS v Canada, Separate Statement of Dean Ronald A. Cass (n 206), para 17. |
9 | 9. CPI, Inc. v Mexico, (n 98), para 120. |
10 | 10. А.А. Рогозина, Некоторые особенности применения оговорок о наибольшем благоприятствовании в международном инвестиционном праве// Вестник РУДН. Серия: Юридические науки. – 2017. – № 2. – 268 c. |
11 | 10. А.А. Рогозина, Некоторые особенности применения оговорок о наибольшем благоприятствовании в международном инвестиционном праве// Вестник РУДН. Серия: Юридические науки. – 2017. – № 2. – 268 c. |