This article presents advanced methodologies for evaluating and enhancing the quality of education in higher education institutions (HEIs). By integrating multiple dimensions such as educational efficiency, research productivity, student activity, and organizational efficiency, we propose enhanced formulas that incorporate interaction and higher-order terms. These complex indicators, including variables such as student performance, satisfaction, research output, and institutional support, provide a comprehensive framework for assessing HEI competitiveness. The educational efficiency formula, for instance, considers student-to-teacher ratios and academic capacity, while research efficiency accounts for publications and citations. The inclusion of interaction terms and non-linear effects captures the multifaceted nature of HEI performance. This approach allows for more nuanced insights, enabling HEIs to identify key areas for improvement and implement targeted strategies to enhance overall educational quality. The proposed methodology is exemplified through data from Bukhara State University, demonstrating its practical application and potential for widespread adoption
This article presents advanced methodologies for evaluating and enhancing the quality of education in higher education institutions (HEIs). By integrating multiple dimensions such as educational efficiency, research productivity, student activity, and organizational efficiency, we propose enhanced formulas that incorporate interaction and higher-order terms. These complex indicators, including variables such as student performance, satisfaction, research output, and institutional support, provide a comprehensive framework for assessing HEI competitiveness. The educational efficiency formula, for instance, considers student-to-teacher ratios and academic capacity, while research efficiency accounts for publications and citations. The inclusion of interaction terms and non-linear effects captures the multifaceted nature of HEI performance. This approach allows for more nuanced insights, enabling HEIs to identify key areas for improvement and implement targeted strategies to enhance overall educational quality. The proposed methodology is exemplified through data from Bukhara State University, demonstrating its practical application and potential for widespread adoption
В этой статье представлены передовые методики оценки и повышения качества образования в высших учебных заведениях (ВУЗАХ). Объединяя множество показателей, таких как эффективность образования, продуктивность научных исследований, активность студентов и эффективность организации, мы предлагаем усовершенствованные формулы, которые включают взаимодействие и термины более высокого порядка. Эти сложные показатели, включающие такие переменные, как успеваемость студентов, удовлетворенность, результаты научных исследований и институциональная поддержка, обеспечивают комплексную основу для оценки конкурентоспособности вуза. Например, формула эффективности образования учитывает соотношение числа студентов и преподавателей и академические способности, в то время как эффективность научных исследований определяется публикациями и цитируемостью. Включение условий взаимодействия и
нелинейных эффектов отражает многогранный характер деятельности вуза. Такой подход позволяет получить более детальную информацию, позволяя вузам определять ключевые области для улучшения и реализовывать целенаправленные стратегии для повышения общего качества образования. Предлагаемая методология проиллюстрирована данными Бухарского государственного университета, демонстрирующими ее практическое применение и потенциал для широкого внедрения
Ushbu maqolada oliy ta’lim muassasalarida (OTM) ta’lim sifatini baholash va oshirishning ilg‘or metodologiyalari keltirilgan. Ta’lim samaradorligi, tadqiqot samaradorligi, talabalar faoliyati va tashkiliy samaradorlik kabi bir nechta o‘lchovlarni birlashtirib, o‘zaro ta'sir va yuqori darajadagi atamalarni o‘z ichiga olgan kengaytirilgan formulalar taklif qilingan. Ushbu murakkab ko‘rsatkichlar, jumladan talabalarning ta’lim olishi, ta’lim xizmatlaridan qoniqishi, tadqiqot natijalari va institutsional qo‘llab-quvvatlash kabi o‘zgaruvchilar, OTM raqobatbardoshligini baholash uchun keng qamrovli asos bo‘lib xizmat qiladi. Masalan, ta’lim samaradorligi formulasi talaba-o‘qituvchi nisbati va akademik salohiyatini hisobga oladi, tadqiqot samaradorligi esa nashrlar va iqtiboslarni hisobga oladi. O‘zaro ta’sir atamalari va chiziqli bo‘lmagan effektlarning kiritilishi OTM faoliyatining ko‘p qirrali xususiyatini aks ettiradi. Ushbu yondashuv yanada nozik tushunchalari anglashga imkon beradi, bu esa OTMlar uchun takomillashtirishning asosiy yo‘nalishlarini aniqlash va umumiy ta’lim sifatini oshirish uchun maqsadli strategiyalarni amalga oshirishga imkon beradi. Taklif etilayotgan metodologiya Buxoro Davlat universiteti ma’lumotlari orqali namuna bo‘lib, uning amaliy qo‘llanilishi va keng qo'llash imkoniyatlarini namoyish etadi
№ | Имя автора | Должность | Наименование организации |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Yuldashev F.I. | PhD researcher | Bukhara State University |
№ | Название ссылки |
---|---|
1 | O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining Qarori “Davlat Oliy Ta’lim muassasalarining akademik va tashkiliy-boshqaruv mustaqilligini ta’minlash bo‘yicha qo‘shimcha chora-tadbirlar To‘g‘risida”. https://lex.uz/docs/-5793261 |
2 | O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Vazirlar Mahkamasining qarori “Moliyaviy Mustaqillik Berilgan Davlat Oliy Ta’lim Muassasalarida Davlat Buyurtmasi (Davlat Granti) Asosida Kadrlar Tayyorlash Uchun O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Davlat Budjetidan Moliyalashtirish Tartibini Tasdiqlash To‘g‘risida”. https://lex.uz/en/docs/- 6137567 |
3 | O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining Qarori “Davlat Oliy Ta’lim Muassasalariga moliyaviy mustaqillik berish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida”. https://lex.uz/ru/docs/-5793251 |
4 | Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. UNESCO |
5 | Anderson, T. (2007). Reducing the loneliness of the distance learner using social software. Open Learning, 22(3), 265-276 |
6 | Bolliger, D. U., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Education, 30(1), 103- 116 |
7 | Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company |
8 | Dinev, T., & Hart, P. (2006). An extended privacy calculus model for ecommerce transactions. Information Systems Research, 17(1), 61-80 |
9 | Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). Horizon report: 2014 higher education edition. The New Media Consortium |
10 | Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119-132 |
11 | Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., & Hung Byers, A. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute |
12 | Robinson, C. C., & Hullinger, H. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84(2), 101-109 |
13 | van Dijk, J. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Sage Publications |
14 | Watson, S., Nind, M., Humphris, D., & Borthwick, A. (2010). Strange new world: Applying a Bourdieuian lens to understanding early student experiences in higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(5), 601-619 |
15 | West, D. M., Bailey, A., & Eschenfelder, K. R. (2012). Internet governance: The new frontier of global institutions. Routledge |
16 | Isroil o’g’li, Y. F. (2024). OLIY TA’LIM TIZIMIDA AKADEMIK MUSTAQILLIK SAMARASIGA ERISHISHDA RAQOBATNING AHAMIYATI. SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TO THE MODERN EDUCATION SYSTEM, 2(21), 49- 51 |
17 | Isroil o’g’li, Y. F. (2024). AKADEMIK MUSTAQILLIK–DEMOKRATIK HAYOT VA SIFATLI TA’LIMNING ASOSIY SHARTI. SCIENTIFIC APPROACH TO THE MODERN EDUCATION SYSTEM, 2(21), 46-48 |
18 | Yuldashev, F. (2023). O'zbekistonda akademik mustaqillikni qoʻllabquvvatlash: 2022-yilgi AFI tadqiqotidan olingan tushunchalar va ilmiy istiqbollar |
19 | Isroil o’g’li, Y. F. (2023). The Importance of the Teacher-Student Ratio in Improving the Quality of the Educational Environment in Higher Educational Institutions. Global Scientific Review, 13, 76-81. Isroil o’g’li, Y. F. (2023). The Importance of the Teacher-Student Ratio in Improving the Quality of the Educational Environment in Higher Educational Institutions. Global Scientific Review, 13, 76-81 |