24

Ushbu maqolada moliya bozorlari va qimmatli qog'ozlar bozorlari o'rtasidagi asosiy farqlarni, ularning o'ziga xos xususiyatlarini, dinamikasini va bozor ishtirokchilari uchun oqibatlarini ko'rib chiqilgan. Moliyaviy bozorlar, birinchi navbatda, bozor xatarlarini boshqarishga, murakkab narxlash modellaridan foydalanishga va savdo strategiyalarini amalga oshirishga qaratilgan bo'lib, umumiy bozor barqarorligini saqlashga qaratilgan me'yoriyhuquqiy bazaga ega. Bundan farqli o'laroq, qimmatli qog'ozlar bozorlari investorlarni himoya qilish va shaxsiy xavfsizlik bilan bog'liq xavflarni yumshatishga ustuvor ahamiyat beradigan tartibga soluvchi muhitda kompaniyaga xos asoslarni, baholash usullarini va portfelni boshqarishni o'z ichiga oladi. Maqolada moliyaviy qarorlar qabul qilish va har bir bozor murakkabliklarini samarali boshqarish uchun ushbu sohaga xos farqlarni bilish va ularga moslashish muhimligi muhokama qilinadi. Shu bilan birga bozorga moslashish va sohaga oid hisobotlar, tendentsiyalar va ilg'or tajribalarni birlashtirish zaruraqtuni ta'kidlaydi. Moliyaviy landshaft rivojlanib borar ekan, texnologiyalarning integratsiyalashuvi va barqarorlikka e'tibor kuchayishi bilan moliyaviy bozorlar va qimmatli qog'ozlar bozorlarini farqlash qobiliyati o'z faoliyatini optimallashtirish va risklarni boshqarishga intilayotgan mutaxassislar va investorlar uchun yanada muhim bo'ladi.

  • Количество прочтений 24
  • Дата публикации 31-07-2024
  • Язык статьиO'zbek
  • Страницы190-200
English

This article examines the key differences between financial markets and security markets, highlighting their distinct characteristics, dynamics, and implications for market participants. Financial markets are primarily focused on managing market risks, leveraging complex pricing models, and executing trading strategies, with a regulatory framework centered on maintaining overall market stability. In contrast, security markets emphasize companyspecific fundamentals, valuation techniques, and portfolio management, within a regulatory environment that prioritizes investor protection and mitigating individual security-related risks. The article discusses the importance of recognizing and adapting to these industry-specific differences in order to make informed decisions and effectively navigate the complexities of each market domain. It underscores the need for continuous learning, adaptability, and the incorporation of industry-specific reports, trends, and best practices. As the financial landscape evolves, with the increasing integration of technology and the growing emphasis on sustainability, the ability to differentiate between financial markets and security markets becomes even more crucial for professionals and investors seeking to optimize their performance and manage risks.

Ўзбек

Ushbu maqolada moliya bozorlari va qimmatli qog'ozlar bozorlari o'rtasidagi asosiy farqlarni, ularning o'ziga xos xususiyatlarini, dinamikasini va bozor ishtirokchilari uchun oqibatlarini ko'rib chiqilgan. Moliyaviy bozorlar, birinchi navbatda, bozor xatarlarini boshqarishga, murakkab narxlash modellaridan foydalanishga va savdo strategiyalarini amalga oshirishga qaratilgan bo'lib, umumiy bozor barqarorligini saqlashga qaratilgan me'yoriyhuquqiy bazaga ega. Bundan farqli o'laroq, qimmatli qog'ozlar bozorlari investorlarni himoya qilish va shaxsiy xavfsizlik bilan bog'liq xavflarni yumshatishga ustuvor ahamiyat beradigan tartibga soluvchi muhitda kompaniyaga xos asoslarni, baholash usullarini va portfelni boshqarishni o'z ichiga oladi. Maqolada moliyaviy qarorlar qabul qilish va har bir bozor murakkabliklarini samarali boshqarish uchun ushbu sohaga xos farqlarni bilish va ularga moslashish muhimligi muhokama qilinadi. Shu bilan birga bozorga moslashish va sohaga oid hisobotlar, tendentsiyalar va ilg'or tajribalarni birlashtirish zaruraqtuni ta'kidlaydi. Moliyaviy landshaft rivojlanib borar ekan, texnologiyalarning integratsiyalashuvi va barqarorlikka e'tibor kuchayishi bilan moliyaviy bozorlar va qimmatli qog'ozlar bozorlarini farqlash qobiliyati o'z faoliyatini optimallashtirish va risklarni boshqarishga intilayotgan mutaxassislar va investorlar uchun yanada muhim bo'ladi.

Русский

В статье рассматриваются ключевые различия между финансовыми рынками и рынками ценных бумаг, подчеркиваются их отличительные характеристики, динамика и последствия для участников рынка. Финансовые рынки в первую очередь ориентированы на управление рыночными рисками, использование сложных моделей ценообразования и реализацию торговых стратегий, а нормативная база ориентирована на поддержание общей стабильности рынка. Напротив, на рынках ценных бумаг особое внимание уделяется фундаментальным принципам, методам оценки и управлению портфелем, специфичным для компании, в рамках нормативной среды, которая отдает приоритет защите инвесторов и снижению индивидуальных рисков, связанных с безопасностью. В статье обсуждается важность признания и адаптации к этим отраслевым различиям для принятия обоснованных решений и эффективного преодоления сложностей каждой области рынка. Это подчеркивает необходимость непрерывного обучения, адаптивности и включения отраслевых отчетов, тенденций и передового опыта. По мере развития финансового ландшафта, с растущей интеграцией технологий и растущим акцентом на устойчивое развитие, способность различать финансовые рынки и рынки ценных бумаг становится еще более важной для профессионалов и инвесторов, стремящихся оптимизировать свою деятельность и управлять рисками.

Ключевые слова
Имя автора Должность Наименование организации
1 Urinov B. . PhD, dots. Toshkent davlat iqtisodiyot universitet
Название ссылки
1 Andrew W. Lo. (2004) The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis. The Journal of Portfolio Management 30th Anniversary Issue, 30(5) 15 - 29
2 Barberis, N. and Thaler, R. (2003) A Survey of Behavioral Finance. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 1, 1053-1128
3 Beltratti, A., & Stulz, R. (2009). Why Did Some Banks Perform Better during the Credit Crisis: A Cross-Country Study of the Impact of Governance and Regulation (pp. 1-38). ECGI Working Paper Series in Finance, Working Paper 254/2009.
4 Brogaard J., Hendershott T., Riordan R. (2014). High-frequency trading and price discovery. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(8), pp. 2267-2306.
5 Claessens, S., & Kodres, L. (2014). The Regulatory Responses to the Global Financial Crisis: Some Uncomfortable Questions. IMF Working Paper No. 46, Research Department and Institute for Capacity Development.
6 Fama, E. (1970) Efficient Capital Market: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. Journal of Finance, 25, 382-417
7 Goldstein M.A., Kumar P., Graves F.C. (2014) Computerized and high-frequency trading. Financial Review, 49(2), pp. 177-202.
8 Hendershott, Terrence, and Ryan Riordan (2013). “Algorithmic Trading and the Market for Liquidity.” The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 48, no. 4, pp.
9 Hirshleifer, D. (2001) Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing. Journal of Finance, 56, 1533- 1597
10 John Campbell and Robert Shiller, (1988), Stock Prices, Earnings and Expected Dividends, No 2511, NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
11 Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision making under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.
12 Levine, R. (1997) Financial Development and Economic Growth Views and Agenda. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 688-726.
13 Merton, R.C. (1995) “A Functional Perspective of Financial Intermediation” Financial Management, Vol. 24, No.2, pp. 23-41.
14 Mishkin, F.S. & Eakins, S.G. (2015). Financial Markets and Institutions, 8th Ed., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc
15 Shiller, R.J. (2003) From Efficient Markets Theory to Behavioral Finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 83-104.
16 Shleifer, A. (2000). Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance. Oxford University Press, 369-374.
17 Stiglitz. (1993). "New and Old Keynesians." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7 (1): 23–44.
18 Thomas Philippon, (2015). "Has the US Finance Industry Become Less Efficient? On the Theory and Measurement of Financial Intermediation,"American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(4), pages 1408-1438, April
19 Viral V. Acharya & T. Sabri Öncü, (2013). "A Proposal for the Resolution of Systemically Important Assets and Liabilities: The Case of the Repo Market,"World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Viral V Acharya & Thorsten Beck & Douglas D Evanoff & George G Kaufman & Richard Portes (ed.), The Social Value of the Financial Sector Too Big to Fail or Just Too Big?, chapter 10, pages 159- 214, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
В ожидании