The integration of English into global education is a complex and multifaceted process. On the one hand, it serves as a powerful tool for fostering international cooperation, enhancing academic mobility, and providing students with access to global employment markets. On the other hand, it introduces challenges related to linguistic equity, cultural preservation, and access to quality English education
| № | Имя автора | Должность | Наименование организации |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Akbarova .A. | teacher | Tashkent Institute of Textile and Light Industry |
| № | Название ссылки |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1.ACE. (2014). The Asian Corpus of English. Director: Andy Kirkpatrick; Researchers: Wang Lixun, John Patkin, Sophiann Subhan. Available at http://corpus.ied.edu.hk/ace/Google Scholar2.Aguilar, M. & Muñoz, C. (2014).The effect of proficiency on CLIL benefits in engineering students in Spain. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar3.Airey, J. (2011). Talking about teaching in English: Swedish university lecturers’ experiences ofchanging teaching language. Ibérica, 22, 35–54.Google Scholar4.Albl-Mikasa, M. (2013). Express-ability in ELF communication. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 2(1), 101–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar5.Albl-Mikasa, M. (2015). ELF speakers’ restricted power of expression: implications for interpret-ers’ processing. In Ehrensberger-Dow, M., Englund Dimitrova, B., Hubscher Davidson, S., & Norberg, U., eds., Describing Cognitive Processes in Translation: 6. Acts and Events. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar6.Albl-Mikasa, M. (2018). ELF and translation/interpreting. In Jenkins, J., Baker, W., & Dewey, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 369–84.Google Scholar7.Ali, S. (2009). Teaching English as an international language (EIL) in the Gulf Corporation Council (GCC) countries: the brown man’s burden. In Sharifian, F., ed., English as an International Language: Perspectives and Pedagogical Issues. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 34–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar8.9.Allwright, D. (1991). The Death of the Method. CRILE Working Paper No. 10. Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar9.Alsagoff, L. (2012a). Another book on EIL? In Alsagoff, L., McKay, S. L., Hu, G., & Renandya, W. A., eds., Principles and Practices for Teaching English as an International Language. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar10.Alsagoff, L. (2012b). Identity and the EIL learner. In Alsagoff, L., McKay, S. L., Hu, G., & Renandya, W. A., eds., Principles and Practices for Teaching English as an International Language. New York: Routledge, pp. 104–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar11.Alsagoff, L., McKay, S. L., Hu, G., & Renandya, W. A., eds., (2012). Principles and Practices of Teaching English as an International Language. Bristol: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar12.Amin, N. (1999). Minority women teachers of ESL: negotiating white English. In Braine, G., ed., Non-Native Educators in English Language Teaching. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 77–92.Google Scholar13.Andon, N. & Eckerth, J. (2009). Chacun à son gout? Task-based L2 pedagogy from the teacher’s point of view. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 286–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar14.Asher, J. (1977). Learning Another Language Through Actions: The Complete Teacher’s Guidebook. California: Sky Oaks Productions.Google Scholar |