54

This study evaluates Georgia’s digital evolution by examining digital gaps across 12 sub-components relative to global median scores. Of these, nine sub-components reveal a significant digital gap, while three outperform the global median. The areas of strength include Institutional Effectiveness and Trust, Institutions and the Business Environment, and the Inputs sub-category from Innovation and Change. These successes reflect Georgia’s potential for growth in institutional and innovation-driven domains. However, the strong correlation coefficient (0.60) between digital gaps and overall digital evolution scores indicates that the digital divide with more developed countries is primarily due to indicators with low absolute values. This underscores the need for targeted investments to address underperforming areas, bridging the gap and enhancing Georgia’s digital development trajectory. This research was supported by a Marie Curie Staff Exchange within the Horizon Europe Programme (grant acronym: CARSI, no: 101086415).

  • Название журналаRaqamli iqtisodiyot
  • Номер выпуска9-son
  • Количество просмотров 54
  • Количество прочтений 54
  • Дата публикации 13-11-2024
  • Язык статьиIngliz
  • Страницы492-502
English

This study evaluates Georgia’s digital evolution by examining digital gaps across 12 sub-components relative to global median scores. Of these, nine sub-components reveal a significant digital gap, while three outperform the global median. The areas of strength include Institutional Effectiveness and Trust, Institutions and the Business Environment, and the Inputs sub-category from Innovation and Change. These successes reflect Georgia’s potential for growth in institutional and innovation-driven domains. However, the strong correlation coefficient (0.60) between digital gaps and overall digital evolution scores indicates that the digital divide with more developed countries is primarily due to indicators with low absolute values. This underscores the need for targeted investments to address underperforming areas, bridging the gap and enhancing Georgia’s digital development trajectory. This research was supported by a Marie Curie Staff Exchange within the Horizon Europe Programme (grant acronym: CARSI, no: 101086415).

Имя автора Должность Наименование организации
1 Abdurakhmonov .A. researcher Tashkent State University of Economics
2 Bobojonov A.B. DSc (marketing), PhD (ICT in economy) Tashkent State University of Economics
3 Irina G.. Associate Professor Ilia State University
Название ссылки
1 Abuladze R., E-Government. TextBook, Second Edition. Publishing House “Universal”. Tbilisi 2013.
2 World Economic Forum. The Global Information Technology Report 2016. Innovating in the Digital Economy. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GITR2016/GITR_2016_full%20report_final.pdf
3 Gogidze, L. (2021), Peculiarities of Implementation of Open Government Practice at the Local Level in Georgia, Meridian Publishing, Tbilisi.
4 Zhang, Y. (2017), “Explaining citizens’ e-participation usage: functionality of e-participation applications”, Administration & Society, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 423-442.
5 Czernich, N., Falck, O., Kretschmer, T., & Woessmann, L. (2011). Broadband infrastructure and economic growth. The Economic Journal, 121(552), 505-532.
6 Mardikyan, S., Yildiz, E. A., Ordu, M. D., & Simsek, B. (2015). Examining the global digital divide: a cross-country analysis. Communications of the IBIMA, 2015, 1.
7 Mitrović, Đ. (2020). Measuring the efficiency of digital convergence. Economics Letters, 188, 108982.
8 Park, S. R., Choi, D. Y., & Hong, P. (2015). Club convergence and factors of digital divide across countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96, 92-100.
9 Myovella, G., Karacuka, M., & Haucap, J. (2020). Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies. Telecommunications Policy, 44(2), 101856.
10 Digital_Intelligence_Dashboard_GE.pdf
11 Qiang, Rossotto, & Kimura, 2009.
В ожидании