ELEKTRON TA’LIMDA TALABA VA O‘QITUVCHINING O‘ZARO MUNOSABATLARIDA  SUN’IY INTELLEKTNING O‘RNI

Admin bo'lib kirish (www.admin.slib.uz)

Tizim sinov (TEST) rejimida ishlamoqda! Murojat uchun @slib_support

Eski talqinga o'tish link

3 апрел 2024

Asosiy til:Rus

ELEKTRON TA’LIMDA TALABA VA O‘QITUVCHINING O‘ZARO MUNOSABATLARIDA SUN’IY INTELLEKTNING O‘RNI

Fan yo'nalishi:

660d801f39874.pdf

PDF

Elektron ta’lim

Maqola chop etish see more

MAQOLA ANNOTATSIYASI

Elektron ta’limda sun’iy intellekt (SI) tizimlari samarali yordam beradi, jumladan, o‘quvchilar uchun o‘qitishni shaxsiylashtirish, o‘qituvchilar uchun odatiy vazifalarni avtomatlashtirish va moslashuvchan baholashni ta'minlaydi. Biroq, sun’iy intellektning imkoniyatlari istiqbolli bo‘lsada, sun’iy intellekt tizimlarining talabalar va professor-o‘qituvchilar o‘rtasidagi o‘zaro munosabatlardagi madaniyat, me’yorlar va umidlarga ta'siri tushunarsizligicha qolmoqda. Elektron ta’limda o‘quvchi va o‘qituvchining munosabati (xususan, muloqot, yordam va mavjudlik) o‘quvchilarning qoniqishi va ta’lim natijalariga chuqur ta’sir qiladi. Shu sababli, o‘quvchilar va o‘qituvchilar SI tizimlarining ularning o‘zaro ta’siriga ta’sirini qanday qabul qilishlarini aniqlash. SI tizimlarining mo‘ljallangan salohiyatiga erishishiga to‘sqinlik qilayotgan va bu o‘zaro ta’sirlar xavfsizligini xavf ostiga qo‘yuvc hi har qanday bo‘shliqlar, qiyinchiliklar yoki to‘siqlarni aniqlash uchun muhim ahamiyatga ega.

MUALIFLAR

Teglar

# artificial intelligence# e-learning# электронное обучение# искусственный интеллект# elektron ta’lim# sun’iy intellekt# talaba va o‘qituvchining o‘zaro # tezkor tanishish.# взаимодействие учащегося с пр# экспресс-знакомства.# student-teacher interaction# speed dating.

Maqolani baholang

0

0 ta

Maqola idintifikatorlari

ROI:

https://eroi.uz/11.0155/A0424-0002

DOI:

Mavjud emas

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

Aslan S., Alyuz N., Tanriover C., Mete S. E., Okur E., D’Mello S. K., Arslan Esme A. Investigating the impact of a real-time, multimodal student engagement analytics technology in authentic classrooms. // In: Proceedings of the 2019. –P.635-685.

Kang M. S. Development of learners’ perceived interaction model and scale between learner and instructor in e-learning environments. // Doctoral dissertation. Korea University, Korea. (2010). –P. 109.

Loi D., Wolf C. T., Blomberg J. L., Arar R., Brereton M. Co-designing AI futures: // Integrating AI ethics, social com-puting, and design. In: Companion publication of the 2019 on designing interactive systems conference 2019 companion 2019. (pp. 381–384).

Roll I., Wylie R. Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. // International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), (2016). –P. 582–599.

Zawacki-Richter O., Marín V. I., Bond M., Gouverneur F. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education –where are the educators?// International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), (2016). – P. 39-49.

Popenici S. A., Kerr S. Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher educa-tion. // Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), (2017). –P. 22.

Laura R. S., Chapman A. The technologisation of education: Philosophical reflections on being too plugged in. // International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, 14(3), (2009). – P. 289-298.

Guilherme A. AI and education: // The importance of teacher and student relations. AI & Society, 34(1), (2019). –P. 47-54.

Felix C. V. The role of the teacher and AI in education. // In: International perspectives on the role of technology in humanizing higher education. Emerald Publishing Limited. (2020). –P. 34-48.

Davidoff S., Lee M. K., Dey A. K., Zimmerman J. Rapidly exploring application design through speed dating. // In: International conference on ubiquitous computing Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2007. − pp. 429-446.

Misiejuk K., Wasson B. State of the field report on learning analytics. // Centre for the Science of Learning & Technology (SLATE), University of Bergen. (2017), –P. 129-139.

Goel A. K., Polepeddi L. Jill Watson: A virtual teaching assistant for online education. // Georgia Institute of Technology. (2016). –P. 203-207.

Luckin R. Towards artificial intelligence-based assessment systems. // Nature Human Behaviour, 1(3), (2017). –P.1-3.

Perin D., Lauterbach M. Assessing text-based writing of low-skilled college students. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(1), (2018). –P. 56-78.