logo
calendar9 May 2025
view27
Asosiy til:O'zbek

KOREYS TILINI O‘QITISHDA BLUM TAKSONOMIYASINING O‘RNI

Fan yo'nalishi:
pdf

681e28df264c0.docx

PDF

MAQOLA ANNOTATSIYASI

quote
Aksariyat chet til o‘qituvchilari Blum taksonomiyasi haqida eshitgan bo‘lishsa ham, aslida, bu qanday dastur ekanligi va uning o‘qitish jarayonidagi samarasi qay darajada ekanligini bilishmaydi. Mazkur maqolada Blum taksonomiyasining kelib chiqish tarixi, maqsadi, dars jarayonini ishlab chiqish va tashkillashtirishdagi ahamiyati hamda sinf faoliyatida qo‘llash usullari haqida so‘z yuritiladi.

MUALLIFLAR

O.Axmedov

O‘zbekiston Davlat Jahon tillari Universiteti

Teglar

# изучение языка# language learning# критическое мышление# critical thinking# корейский язык# tanqidiy fikrlash# written speech competence# til o‘rganish# koreys tili# Blum taksonomiyasi# разработка учебной программы# Blum’s Taxonomy# Korean# testing technology# curriculum development# yozma nutq kompetensiyasi# test texnologiyasi# o‘quv dasturlarini ishlab chiqis# Таксономия Блума# письменная коммуникативная компе# технология тестирования

SHU JURNALDAGI BOSHQA MAQOLALAR

Maqolani baholang

0
0 ta baho
5
4
3
2
1

Maqola idintifikatorlari

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar

1. A Committee of College and University Examiners. Taxonomy of educational objectives. The Classification of Educational Goals. HANDBOOK 1 Cognitive domain / ed. Benjamin S. Blum et al. LONGMANS, 1956.

2. Williams M., Lively M., Harper J. Higher Order Thinking Skills: Tools for Bridging the Gap // Foreign Lang Ann. 1994. Vol. 27, № 3. P. 405–426.

3. Anderson L.W. et al. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. A Revision of Blum’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Pearson Education, 2001.

4. Forehand, M., Blum’s taxonomy. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, 2010. 41, pg 47.

5. Nussbaum E.M., Edwards O. V. Critical questions and argument stratagems: A framework for enhancing and analyzing students’ reasoning practices // Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2011. Vol. 20, № 3. P. 443–488.

6. Ngum N.D. The Benefits of Critical Thinking Skills and Techniques for Teaching these Skills in the Classroom for Quality Education // African journal of Social Sciences. 2019. Vol. 10, № 3. P. 99–106.

7. Soyadı B.B.Y. Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Problem-based Learning Environments // Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity. 2015. Vol. 2, № 2. P. 71.

8. Kimura, D., & Tatsuno, M. Advancing 21st Century Competencies in Japan. Noble, T. Integrating the revised Blum’s taxonomy with multiple intelligences: A planning tool for curriculum differentiation. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 2017. 193-211.

9. White B.Y., Frederiksen J.R. Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students // Cogn Instr. 1998. Vol. 16, № 1. P. 3–118.

10. Zhan Y. et al. Effects of online peer assessment on higher‐order thinking: A meta‐analysis // British Journal of Educational Technology. 2023. Vol. 54, № 4. P. 817–835.