681e28df264c0.docx
DOI:
Mavjud emas
1. A Committee of College and University Examiners. Taxonomy of educational objectives. The Classification of Educational Goals. HANDBOOK 1 Cognitive domain / ed. Benjamin S. Blum et al. LONGMANS, 1956.
2. Williams M., Lively M., Harper J. Higher Order Thinking Skills: Tools for Bridging the Gap // Foreign Lang Ann. 1994. Vol. 27, № 3. P. 405–426.
3. Anderson L.W. et al. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. A Revision of Blum’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Pearson Education, 2001.
4. Forehand, M., Blum’s taxonomy. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology, 2010. 41, pg 47.
5. Nussbaum E.M., Edwards O. V. Critical questions and argument stratagems: A framework for enhancing and analyzing students’ reasoning practices // Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2011. Vol. 20, № 3. P. 443–488.
6. Ngum N.D. The Benefits of Critical Thinking Skills and Techniques for Teaching these Skills in the Classroom for Quality Education // African journal of Social Sciences. 2019. Vol. 10, № 3. P. 99–106.
7. Soyadı B.B.Y. Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Problem-based Learning Environments // Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity. 2015. Vol. 2, № 2. P. 71.
8. Kimura, D., & Tatsuno, M. Advancing 21st Century Competencies in Japan. Noble, T. Integrating the revised Blum’s taxonomy with multiple intelligences: A planning tool for curriculum differentiation. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 2017. 193-211.
9. White B.Y., Frederiksen J.R. Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students // Cogn Instr. 1998. Vol. 16, № 1. P. 3–118.
10. Zhan Y. et al. Effects of online peer assessment on higher‐order thinking: A meta‐analysis // British Journal of Educational Technology. 2023. Vol. 54, № 4. P. 817–835.