logo
calendar8 May 2026
view7
Main language:Uzbek

Abu’l-Ma’ali Muhammad ibn Ubaydullah’s “Bayan al-Adyan”: A Source Analysis in Eastern Comparative Religion

Field of Science:Arts and HumanitiesHistoryPhilosophy
pdf

7_7d904c55.pdf

PDF

ARTICLE ANNOTATION

quote
This article is devoted to the analysis of Bayan al-Adyan, the first comparative study of religions written in the Persian language by the 11th-century scholar Abul-Ma’ali Muhammad ibn Ubaydullah Husayni Alawi, who lived in Khorasan. Although information about the author’s life is limited in the sources, the content of the work and certain data presented in it indicate that the scholar was close to the Ghaznavid court, held a high position in society, and possessed a profound rationalist mode of thought. The article examines the author’s impartial exposition of various religions and sects, and in particular his methodology for classifying Islamic currents on the basis of the hadith of the «73 sects (firqas).» Drawing on the juridical (fiqh) and doctrinal indications contained in the work, the article substantiates Abu al-Ma’ali’s own affiliation with the Sunni-Hanafi tradition. The article also sets out in detail the historical circumstances connected with the fate of the work’s manuscript copies, in particular the first critical edition prepared by the renowned Iranian historian Abbas Iqbal Ashtiyani, and the subsequent discovery of a complete copy of the work by Muhammad Taqi Danesh-Pazhuh. The work «Bayan al-Adyan» consists of five chapters in total and reflects not only religious teachings but also the geographical and anthropological conceptions of the eleventh-century Muslim world. Of particular note are the author’s observations concerning the conceptions of the deity held by various peoples, including the pre-Islamic Turks and the Indians. As one of the most beautiful and rare specimens of the Persian language, the work has left an indelible mark on the tradition of the history of Islamic schools of thought (maqalat). Among the sources of «Bayan al-Adyan» are cited the works of such thinkers as Abu Zayd al-Maqdisi, Abu Rayhan al-Biruni, Muhammad ibn Harun al-Warraq, and Abu al-Hasan Muhammad ibn Yusuf al-Amiri al-Nishapuri. In conclusion, the study reveals the structure of the work, consisting of five chapters, as well as the significance of the information it contains on pre-Islamic religions (Zoroastrianism, Judaism, Christianity) and on the false prophets who came forward with unscientific claims.

AUTHORS

M.Abdupattaev

"O`ZBEKISTON XALQARO ISLOM AKADEMIYASI" DAVLAT MUASSASASI

Tags

# source studies# Abu al-Ma’ali Muhammad# Bayan al-Adyan# comparative religious studies# history of sects (firaq)# Ghaznavid era# hadith of the 73 sects# Abbas Iqbal# scholarly milieu of Khurasan# classification of religious-juridical schools

SIMILAR ARTICLES

OTHER ARTICLES IN THIS JOURNAL

Rate Article

0
0 ratings
5
4
3
2
1

References

Abul-Maoliy. (1312/1934.). Bayonul adyon dar sharh-i adyon ve Mazahib-i johiliy va islomiy. Tehron: Intishorot-i Ibn Sino.

Humeyniy., R. M. (1365). Risola-i tavzihil masoil. . Tehron: Intishoroti jabxonai vizoroti irshodi islomiy.

Kutlu., S. (2008). Mezhepler Tarihine Giriş. . Istanbul: Dem Yayınları.

Vevyurko. (2013). Septuaginta: drevnegrecheskiy tekst Vetxogo Zaveta v istorii religioznoy misli. Moskva: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo universiteta.

Al-Mo’jam al-vasiyt. (2004). Qohira: Maktaba ash-shuruq ad-duvaliyya.

Başaran, T. (2011). Thermal Analysis of the Domed Vernacular Houses of Harran, Turkey. Sage Journal, 20(5), 543–554.

Beruniy, A. R. (1968). Qadimgi xalqlardan qolgan yodgorliklar. Toshkent: Fan.

Bosworth, C. (15 December 2003 y.). Harran. Encyclopaedia Iranica, pp. 13–14.

Buckley, J. J. (2002). The Mandaeans: ancient texts and modern people. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gündüz, Ş. (2016). Sâbiîler: Son Gnostikler. Istanbul: Vadi Yayınları.

Häberl, C. (2021). «Mandaic and the Palestinian Question». Journal of the American Oriental Society, 171–184.

Hazm, I. (2011). Al-Fisol. Istanbul: Bilnet matbaacilik.

Kasir, I. (1999). Muxtasar tafsir Ibn Kasir. Bayrut: Dor al-ma’rifat.

Masse., H. (1986). Abu’l-Ma‘âli Muhammad b. ‘Ubayd Allâh, EI2. (Т. I). Leiden: E.J.Brill

Mukhamedov, N., & Turambetov, N. METHODOLOGIES EMPLOYED BY AL BERUNI IN THE ANALYSIS OF RELIGIOUS SYSTEMS // Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research ISSN: 2278-4853 Vol. 12, Issue 12, December 2023 SJIF 2022 = 8.179 -P.105-110.

Nasoraia, B. S. (2012). Sacred Text and Esoteric Praxis in Sabian Mandaean Religion. DİNÎ VE FELSEFÎ METİNLER: YİRMİBİRİNCİ YÜZYILDA YENİDEN OKUMA, ANLAMA VE ALGILAMA (стр. 27-53). Sultanbeyli: Kültür Yayın.

Norberg, M. (1816). Codex Nasaraeus Liber Adami appellatus. Lund: Lund.

Roziy, F. (1981). Mafotih al-g’ayb. Bayrut: Dor al-fikr.

S.Lloyd, W.Brice. (25 December 2013 г.). Harran. Anatolina Studies(1), 77 - 111.

Shahristoniy. (1968). Al-Milal va-n-nihal. Qohira: Muassasa lin-nasr va-t-tavazi’.

Sinclair, T. (1990). Eastern Turkey: An Architectural & Archaeological Survey, Volume IV. New York: Pindar Press.

Yusuf, S. M. (2008). Tafsiri Hilol. Toshkent: Hilol-nashr.