The article is devoted to some aspects of the functional specificity of lexical borrowings - neologisms - that have found their vivid reflection in the works and philosophical thought of the European era and, in particular, the English Renaissance, represented by its brightest representatives such as Thomas More, Francis Bacon, John Donne, Shakespeare and others. The authors consider this problem in a synchronous-diachronous cut and in the light of the new socio-political situations of the century of the English Renaissance and in the light of the evolutionary process of the formation of the English nation and the norms of the literary English language, which continued intensively in the 11th century, which led to the further growth and spread of both oral, and written national literary language.
The article is devoted to some aspects of the functional specificity of lexical borrowings - neologisms - that have found their vivid reflection in the works and philosophical thought of the European era and, in particular, the English Renaissance, represented by its brightest representatives such as Thomas More, Francis Bacon, John Donne, Shakespeare and others. The authors consider this problem in a synchronous-diachronous cut and in the light of the new socio-political situations of the century of the English Renaissance and in the light of the evolutionary process of the formation of the English nation and the norms of the literary English language, which continued intensively in the 11th century, which led to the further growth and spread of both oral, and written national literary language.
№ | Author name | position | Name of organisation |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Shodiev S.S. | student | Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali Ibn Sino |
2 | Bakaev N.B. | student | Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali Ibn Sino |
3 | Tasheva N.Z. | student | Bukhara State Medical Institute named after Abu Ali Ibn Sino |
№ | Name of reference |
---|---|
1 | 1. Rutenburg V.I. Renaissance Society. / / Renaissance Culture and Society. - M .: Nauka, 1986. – p. 3-7. |
2 | 2. Akhundov M.D. The concept of space and time: origins, evolution, perspectives. - M., 1982.-222 p. |
3 | 3. Konrad N.I. The Middle Ages in Historical Science. Fav. works. - M., 1975.-496 p |
4 | 4. Shaikhislamova Z.F. Ethno-mental aspects of the reconstruction of the worldview in the context of ethno-ontological interpretation // East-West: Interaction of languages and cultures. Sat. mater. III International Scientific Conference. 2015. p.180-186. |
5 | 5. Shadmanov K. English spirituality and language:. - Dusseldorf: Lambert Publishing House, 2015 .— p. 264. |
6 | 6. Khanazarov K. Globalashuv v til falsafasi. - Toshkent, 2014. -136 p |
7 | 7. Shadmanov K. (2019). Formation of a new integral world outlook and English Renaissance philosophy of language: problems of comprehension of semiotic reality // Cross-Cultural Studies: Education and Science (CCS & ES), vol. 4, Issue 11, June 2019, pp. 72-81. |
8 | 8. Stupin L.P. The problem of normativity in the history of English lexicography in the XY-XX centuries. - L .: Publishing house of Leningrad State University, 1989. - 164 p. |
9 | 9. The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles / Ed. Onions. L., 1968. - pp. 2672. |
10 | 10. Садуллаев, Д. Б. Philosophical understanding of terms and concepts by an author as an object of linguistic investigations / Д. Б. Садуллаев. — Текст : непосредственный // Молодой ученый. — 2020. — № 22 (312). — p. 627 |
11 | 11. Denis Bakhtiyorovich Sadullaev Terminology as a separate scientific field and its actual position in modern linguistics. // ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. - November, 2020. - Vol. 10, Issue 11. - С. 1969-1978. |