This article analyses the separated lexical groups of words and phrases of Arabic origin, defined in the work of Qisasi Rabguzi by Nasuriddin Rabguzi, first written in Turkic language based on Islamic sources in the XIII-XIV centuries in Khorezm.The study of Arabic loanwords in manuscripts in the diachronic aspect includes not only in determining the methods of developing linguistic facts, but also studying the history of the people who created it. One of the common ways of the historical development of a language and its vocabulary is the analysis of the words of a language in separated subject groups.The definition of affiliation of Arabic words to certain areas, the thematic grouping will give a complete picture of the spirituality, the legal level of the peoples of that era, and partnership relations with neighboring and fraternal peoples. The study revealed and analyzed 24 lexical groups of Arabic loanwords given in the work and made a scientific analysis of these words. In addition, there were indicated the researches which performed an analysis of the vocabulary of the language in separated subject groups. Several kinds of proper names, being effectively used in the language of the work, were identified. It was also concluded that borrowed and exotic anthroponyms, ethnonyms, theonyms and toponyms and religious vocabulary are the most frequently used groups in the language of the work. This research plays an important role in the study of the historical development of the process of borrowing Arabic words and lexical composition in the language of the Turkic peoples of the XIII-XIV centuries.
This article analyses the separated lexical groups of words and phrases of Arabic origin, defined in the work of Qisasi Rabguzi by Nasuriddin Rabguzi, first written in Turkic language based on Islamic sources in the XIII-XIV centuries in Khorezm.The study of Arabic loanwords in manuscripts in the diachronic aspect includes not only in determining the methods of developing linguistic facts, but also studying the history of the people who created it. One of the common ways of the historical development of a language and its vocabulary is the analysis of the words of a language in separated subject groups.The definition of affiliation of Arabic words to certain areas, the thematic grouping will give a complete picture of the spirituality, the legal level of the peoples of that era, and partnership relations with neighboring and fraternal peoples. The study revealed and analyzed 24 lexical groups of Arabic loanwords given in the work and made a scientific analysis of these words. In addition, there were indicated the researches which performed an analysis of the vocabulary of the language in separated subject groups. Several kinds of proper names, being effectively used in the language of the work, were identified. It was also concluded that borrowed and exotic anthroponyms, ethnonyms, theonyms and toponyms and religious vocabulary are the most frequently used groups in the language of the work. This research plays an important role in the study of the historical development of the process of borrowing Arabic words and lexical composition in the language of the Turkic peoples of the XIII-XIV centuries.
| № | Author name | position | Name of organisation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAGDULLAEVA D.. | Doctoral student | O'zbekiston xalqaro islom akademiyasi |
| № | Name of reference |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1. Аbdulxayrov, М. (1996) The lexical layers of the language of «Devoni Munis». Auto abstract of PhD dissertation. Тashkent. 2. Аbdushukurov, B.B. (2017) The lexics of «Qisasi Rabguzi». The D.S. dissertation. Тashkent. 3. Akmalkhanov, A. (2019) «Abu Yakub Sakkokiy’s views about verb words», The Light of Islam: Vol. 2019: Iss.3, Article 14. https://uzjournals.edu.uz › iiau › vol2019 › iss3 4. Bafoev, B. (1983) The lexics of the works of A.Navoi. Тashkent. 5. Begmatov, E. (1985) The lexical layers of contemporary Uzbek literary language. Тashkent. 6. Goldin, V.Е. (1970) On one aspect of studying thematic groups of words. The languages of society. Vol.2. Мoscow. 7. Dadabaev, Х. (1991) The public-political and socialeconomical terminology in the Turkic written sculptures of XI–XIV cc.. Тashkent. 8. Islomov, Z. (2019) «The role of the International Islamic Academy of Uzbekistan in the development of islamic studies», The Light of Islam: Vol. 2019 : Iss. 1. https:// uzjournals.edu.uz/iiau/vol2019/iss1/1 9. Каrmisheva, B.Х. (1978) The tracks of mid-century ethnonyms and anthroponyms in Uzbek theologies. The Onomastics of Central Asia. F., 18–28. 10. Каzakbaeva, G.А. (2009) The Arabizms in practical and theoretical aspects of uzbek language: the PhD dissertation. Мoscow, 102. 11. Mutallibov, S.( 1959) The brief essay on the history of morphology and lexics. Тashkent, 133–134. 12. Rabguzi, Nāsirüd-din bin Burhanüd-din. (1997). Kisasül–enbiya. I cilt. Аnkara. 13. Rabguzi, Nāsirüd-din bin Burhanüd-din. (1990). The first book. Тashkent. 14. Rabguzi, Nāsirüd-din bin Burhanüd-din. (1990). The second book. Тashkent. 15. Nizamova, F. (2019). The history of studying Khusrav Dekhlavi‘s work. The Light of Islam, 2019(2), 19. 95-99. Retrieved from https://uzjournals.edu.uz/iiau/ vol2019/iss2/19 16. Nosirova, M. (2019). Scientific heritage of Makhmud Zamakhshari and actual questions of the studies of Mavarennakhrs linguistic school. The Light of Islam, 2019(1), 14. Available at: https://uzjournals.edu. uz/iiau/vol2019/iss1/14 17. Rustamiy, S. (2016). Science of Balaghat and related manuscripts in Tashkent. Global Journal of Advanced Research (Sholariy Peer Review Publishing System) Retrieved from http://www.gjar.org/publishpaper/ vol3issue11/ed626r81.pdf 18. Rustamiy, S. (2019). Poetical art of Yusuf Balasagun. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 09 (77), 256-259. Retrieved from http://t-science.org/ arxivDOI/2019/09-77/PDF/09-77-45.pdf 19. Sagdullaeva, D. (2019) Тhe morphological peculiarities of Arabic loanwords in «The stories of prophets» by Rabghuzi . International scientific journal Theoritical and Applied science. 09 (77). https://www.researchgate. net › publication › 336260490 20. Uluqov, N.М. (1997) The exotic lexics of Uzbek religious texts. – The PhD dissertation: Тashkent. 21. Husaniov, N. (2000) The lexico-semantic and methodological peculiarities of anthroponyms in Uzbek written monuments of the XVth century. The dissertation of D.S. Тashkent. 22. The annotated dictionary of Uzbek language.( 2006) The second volume. Тashkent. 23. Shoaliyeva, N. (2019). Compossition «Maslak ulMuttaqin» Sufi-Allohyor to the Turk (old Uzbek)Persian literature. The Light of Islam, 2019(2), 15. Retrieved from https://uzjournals.edu.uz/iiau/vol2019/ iss2/15 |