22

Ushbu tadqiqot 2000-yildan 2020-yilgacha 20 ta rivojlanayotgan bozorda savdo ochiqligi iqtisodiy rivojlanishga qanday ta’sir qilishini o‘rganadi. U mamlakatlarni savdo siyosati, ochiqlik darajasi va iqtisodiy o‘sish natijalari asosida taqqoslaydi. Tadqiqot mintaqaviy farqlarni ko‘rsatib o‘tadi va bunda Osiyo iqtisodiyoti Afrika va Lotin Amerikasidagi bozorlarga qaraganda yaxshiroq natijalarni ko‘rsatganligini keltirib o‘tadi. Natijalar shuni ko‘rsatadiki, savdo ochiqligi har bir mamlakat ehtiyojlariga moslashtirilgan kuchli institutlar va siyosatlar tomonidan qo‘llab-quvvatlansa, rivojlanishga samarali turtki berishi mumkin.

  • Read count 22
  • Date of publication 27-12-2024
  • Main LanguageO'zbek
  • Pages138-146
English

This study examines how trade openness impacts economic development in 20 emerging markets from 2000 to 2020. It compares countries based on trade policies, levels of openness, and economic growth outcomes. The research highlights regional differences, with Asian economies showing better results than many in Africa and Latin America. The findings suggest that trade openness can drive development when supported by strong institutions and policies tailored to each country's needs.

Ўзбек

Ushbu tadqiqot 2000-yildan 2020-yilgacha 20 ta rivojlanayotgan bozorda savdo ochiqligi iqtisodiy rivojlanishga qanday ta’sir qilishini o‘rganadi. U mamlakatlarni savdo siyosati, ochiqlik darajasi va iqtisodiy o‘sish natijalari asosida taqqoslaydi. Tadqiqot mintaqaviy farqlarni ko‘rsatib o‘tadi va bunda Osiyo iqtisodiyoti Afrika va Lotin Amerikasidagi bozorlarga qaraganda yaxshiroq natijalarni ko‘rsatganligini keltirib o‘tadi. Natijalar shuni ko‘rsatadiki, savdo ochiqligi har bir mamlakat ehtiyojlariga moslashtirilgan kuchli institutlar va siyosatlar tomonidan qo‘llab-quvvatlansa, rivojlanishga samarali turtki berishi mumkin.

Русский

В этом исследовании рассматривается, как открытость торговли влияет на экономическое развитие в 20 развивающихся рынках с 2000 по 2020 год. В нем страны сравниваются на основе торговой политики, уровня открытости и результатов экономического роста. Исследование подчеркивает региональные различия, при этом азиатские экономики показывают лучшие результаты, чем многие в Африке и Латинской Америке. Результаты показывают, что открытость торговли может стимулировать развитие, если поддерживается сильными институтами и политикой, адаптированной к потребностям каждой страны.

№ Author name position Name of organisation
1 Norkobilov A.. - Denov tadbirkorlik va pedagogika instituti
№ Name of reference
1 Baldwin, R. (2020). The role of institutions in trade growth. Economic Policy, 35(1), 1-18.
2 Békés, G., & Muraközy, B. (2020). The impact of trade liberalization on economic growth. International Economics, 162, 22-38.
3 Diniz, E. (2021). Trade openness and its effects on growth in Latin America. Journal of Economic Development, 48(4), 15-29.
4 Ghosh, S., & Singh, M. (2022). Trade openness and economic performance in Sub-Saharan Africa. Development Economics, 20(1), 47-60.
5 Hakimjon, H., & Akobir, N. (2024) THE EXPERIENCE OF SINGAPORE IN PROMOTING FOREIGN TRADE ACTIVITIES.
6 Hausmann, R., Klinger, B., & Rodriguez, F. (2020). The dynamics of export diversification. Economic Growth and Development Review, 7(2), 13-29.
7 Madsen, J. B. (2021). The impact of trade on economic growth in low- and middle-income countries. World Development, 142, 105348.
8 McMillan, M., & Rodrik, D. (2021). Export diversification and structural transformation. Journal of Development Economics, 154, 50-63.
9 Norkobilov A. (2024). The Role of Direct Investment in Shaping Foreign Trade (in the Case of Countries). EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS STARTUPS AND OPEN SOCIETY, 4(3), 291-297.
10 O'Rourke, K. H., & Williamson, J. G. (2021). Trade and development: The historical record. Economic History Review, 74(2), 293-314.
11 Pradhan, S. (2022). The role of trade policy in emerging economies. Journal of Policy Reform, 12(3), 189-204.
12 Rodriguez, F., & Barroso, R. (2022). FDI, trade openness, and economic development. World Development Perspectives, 9, 89-100.
13 Sahoo, S. (2021). Institutional quality and trade openness in developing countries. Asian Economic Policy Review, 16(1), 34-51.
14 Sharma, R., & Kumar, P. (2022). Institutional reforms for achieving the benefits of trade openness. Development Policy Review, 40(5), 125-145.
15 Sirajiddinov N. & Norkobilov A. (2024). EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF INVOICING CURRENCY ON FOREIGN TRADE. Science and innovation, 3 (A4), 166-174. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11057020
16 Zhang, Y., & Li, X. (2021). Institutional quality and trade liberalization: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 30(6), 597-614.
Waiting