517

Мазкур мақолада жиноят процессида эксперт ва мутахассисларнинг иштирокига инсонпарварлик нуқтаи назардан ёндашув таҳлили баён қилинган. Унда жиноят-процессуал қонун ҳужжатларида эксперт ва мутахассиснинг ҳуқуқлари ва мажбуриятлари, ваколатларини амалга оширишда шахс-жамият-давлат узвий занжири орқали самарали ва гуманистик механизм яратиш имкониятлари ёритилган ҳамда асосли таклифлар илгари сурилган.

  • Read count 504
  • Date of publication 24-07-2019
  • Main LanguageO'zbek
  • Pages28-37
Ўзбек

Мазкур мақолада жиноят процессида эксперт ва мутахассисларнинг иштирокига инсонпарварлик нуқтаи назардан ёндашув таҳлили баён қилинган. Унда жиноят-процессуал қонун ҳужжатларида эксперт ва мутахассиснинг ҳуқуқлари ва мажбуриятлари, ваколатларини амалга оширишда шахс-жамият-давлат узвий занжири орқали самарали ва гуманистик механизм яратиш имкониятлари ёритилган ҳамда асосли таклифлар илгари сурилган.

Русский

В настоящей статье изложен анализ подхода с гуманистической точки зрения к участию в уголовном процессе экспертов и специалистов. В нем освещены возможности создания в уголовно-процессуальном законодательстве эффективного и гуманистического последовательного звена личность-общество-государство при осуществлении прав и обязанностей, а также полномочий экспертов и специалистов, выдвинуты обоснованные предложения.

English

This article presents an analysis of the approach from a humanistic point of view to the participation in the criminal process of experts and specialists. It highlights the possibilities for creating in the criminal procedural legislation an effective and humanistic consistent element of the individual-society-state in the exercise of rights and duties, as well as the powers of experts and specialists, and reasonable proposals were put forward.

Author name position Name of organisation
1 Matkarimov K.. Мустақил изланувчи
Name of reference
1 1. Averyanova T.V. Forensic examination. A course of general theory. - M., 2009. - p. 183
2 2. Belkin R.S. Forensics course. In 3 t. T. 2: Private forensic theories. - M., 2017. - p. 80.
3 3. Arsenyev V.D., Zablotsky V.G. The use of special knowledge in establishing the actual circumstances of the criminal case. - Krasnoyarsk, 2011. - p. 402
4 4. Pulatov Yu.S. Features of the documentary materials, articles and articles that are to be sent to the Expertise / Theoretical and practical conference on "Prospects for forensic science achievements and development prospects". - Tashkent, 2001. - p. 39.
5 5. Muhitdinov R.A. The role of forensic expertise in combating crime / Materials of the Republican Interdepartmental Scientific-Practical Conference on the Prospects of Judicial Expert Examination in Uzbekistan. - Tashkent, 2006. - p.13.
6 6. Otaxuzhaev S.А. Actual problems of judicial expertise at this stage. Materials of the Republican Interdepartmental Scientific-Practical Conference on the Prospects of Judicial Expert Review in Uzbekistan. - Tashkent, 2006. - p. 24
7 7. Alimova R., Otaxuzhaev S. Issues of the organization and conduct of forensic examination. Educational manual. Responsible editor: prof. M.H.Rustambaev. - Tashkent: New Generation, 2001. - p. 3.
8 8. Isarov Q.I. The role of forensic examination in the administration of justice / Materials of the Republican Interdepartmental Scientific-Practical Conference on the Prospects of Judicial Expert Review in Uzbekistan. - Tashkent, 2006. - p. 14
9 9. Astanov I.R. Criminal investigation: theory and practice. - Tashkent: TSIL, 2010. – p. 232
10 10. Astanov I.R. Criminal investigation: theory and practice. - Tashkent: TSIL, 2010. – p. 232 .; Kolkutin V.V., Zosimov S.M., Pustovalov L.V., Kharlamov S.G., Aksenov S.A. Forensic expertise. - M., 2001. - P. 20–26; A practical guide for the production of forensic examinations for experts and specialists: Scientific and practical guide / Ed. TV Averyanovoy, VFStatkus. - M., 2011. - pp. 38–42
11 11. Balakshin V.S. Assessment of the admissibility of evidence. // Criminal process. 2017. №1. - p. 39
12 12. Zimin A.M. Criminalistics in investigative actions: Educational and practical manual. - M., 2014. - p. 21
13 13. Derevyagin Yu.T., Garitovskaya E.V., Toleubekova B.Kh. Participation of an accounting specialist in investigative and non-procedural actions in cases of embezzlement of socialist property. - M., 1989. - p. 18
14 14. Commentary on the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation: A Practical Guide for Investigators, Inquirers, Prosecutors, Lawyers / Ed. ed. V.V. Mozyakov. - M., 2002. - p. 166
15 15. Smorodinova A.G. Problems of using special knowledge at the stage of initiating a criminal case in the Russian criminal process: Diss. ... Cand. legal sciences. - Saratov, 2001. - p. 78–79
16 16. Shumatov Yu.T. The use of special knowledge in the preliminary investigation: Diss. ... Cand. legal sciences. - M., 1996. - P. 78–79
17 17. Gurdin S.V. Participation of a specialist cynologist at the pre-trial stages of the criminal process: Diss. ... Cand. legal sciences. - M., 2001. - p. 25
18 19. Snetkov V.A. The basics of a specialist expert forensic units of the internal affairs bodies: Tutorial. - M., 2001. - p. 30.)
19 20. Zimin A.M. Criminalistics in investigative actions: Educational and practical manual. - M., 2004. - p. 25
Waiting