377

  • Web Address
  • DOI
  • Date of creation in the UzSCI system 13-04-2020
  • Read count 337
  • Date of publication 24-11-2018
  • Main LanguageRus
  • Pages160-163
Tags
Ўзбек

Ҳозирги замонавий хирургиянинг ютуқларига қарамай бугунги кунда кам КИХ лапароскопик хирургия учун махсус етказиб берувчи укуналар йуқ. Бундай ускуналар қуйдаги талабларга жавоббериши керак: кукун кўринишидаги воситаларни аниқ дозалаш имконини бериш, қорин босими ошгаг холатда хавфсиз ва самарали қўлланилиши. Кам инвазив хирургияда Гепроцел қон тўхтатувчи имплантатаини қўллаш учун “Академик В.Вохидов номидаги РИХИАТМ” ДМ ходмлари томонидан янги етказиб берувчи ускуна ишлаб чиқилди. Ускунанинг самарадорлиги эксперимент шароитида 7.5 кг вазнга эга бўлган йирик хайвонларда синаб кўрилди. Ишлаб чиқилган етказибберувчи ускуна Гепроцел қон тўхтатувчи имплантатини жароҳат юзаси бўйлаб бир текис тақисмлаш имконини таъминлади. Таклиф этилаётган ускуна самарали етказиб бериш тизимига эга бўлиб, лапароскопик операцияларда манипуляциялар ўтказилганда қон тўхтатувчи кукуни керакли бўлган жойга дозалаш қобилиятига эга

English

Despite the achievement of modern surgery in nowadays, there is no special delivery device for laparoscopic surgery in the minimally invasive surgery. This kind of device must meet the following characteristics: the ability to dispense a certain amount of powder in the target zone, safety and efficiency at the high pressure in the abdominal cavity. A new delivery device for the use of hemostatic powder Heprocel in minimally invasive surgery was developed by the developers of SI “RSSPMCS named after acad. V.Vakhidov”. The effectiveness of the delivery device was evaluated experimentally on 8 mongrel dogs weighing up to 7.5 kg. The developed delivery device ensures an uniform distribution of the hemostatic implant Heprocel over the wound surface of the liver. The proposed device is an effective delivery system capable of transport a dosed amount of hemostatic powder to the target bleeding area during manipulations in laparoscopic surgery

№ Name of reference
1 1. Abul Nagah, G., EL-Fayoumi, T., Lotfy, H., Shehab, W., and Tarek, A., 2007, Comparative study between using harmonic scalpel and electrocautery in modified radical mastectomy. Egyptian Journal of Surgery, 26, 176–180. 2. Antisdel, J.L., Janney, C.G., Long, J.P., and Sindwani, R., 2008, Hemostatic agent microporous polysaccharide hemospheres (MPH) does not affect healing or intact sinus mucosa. The Laryngoscope, 118, 1265–1270. 3. ASGE Technology Committee, Wong Kee Song, L.M., Banerjee, S., Barth, B.A., Bhat, Y., Desilet, D., Gottlieb, K.T., Maple, J.T., Pfau, P.R., Pleskow, D.K., Siddiqui, U.D., Tokar, J.L., Wang, A., and Rodriquez, S.A., 2012, Emerging technologies for endoscopic hemostasis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 75, 933–937. 4. Bjo ¨rses, K., and Holst, J., 2007, Various local hemostatic agents with different modes of action; An in vivo comparative randomized vascular surgical experimental study. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 33, 363–370. 5. De la Torre, R.A., Bachman, S.L., Wheeler, A.A., Bartow, K.N., and Scott, J.S., 2007, Hemostasis and hemostatic agents in MIS. Journal of Surgery, 142, 39-45. 6. Daniell, J., Fisher, B., and Alexander, W., 1993, Laparoscopic evaluation of the argon beam coagulator: Initial report. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 38, 121–125. 7. Gill, I.S., Desai, M.M., Kaouk, J.H., Meraney, A.M., Murphy, D.P., Sung, G.T., and Novick, A.C., 2002, Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: Duplicating open surgical techniques. Journal of Urology, 167, 469–477. 8. Hoffman, N.E., Siddiqui, S.A., Agarwal, S., McKellar, S.H., Kurtz, H.J., Gettman, M.T., and Ereth, M.H., 2009, Choice of hemostatic agent influence adhesion formation in a rat cecal adhesion model. Journal of Surgical Research, 155, 77–81. 9. Holster, I.L., Poley, J.W., Kuipers, E.J., and Tjwa, E.T., 2012, Controlling gastric variceal bleeding with endoscopically applied hemostatic powder (HemosprayTM). Journal of Hepatology, 57, 1397–1398. Letter to Editor. 10. Klingler, C.H., Remzi, M., Marberger, M., and Janetschek, G., 2006, Haemostasis in laparoscopy. European Urology, 50, 948–957. 11. Kordestani, S.S., Noohi, F., Azarnik, H., Basiri, H., Hashemi, M.J., Abdi, S., Mohebi, A., Madani, M., and Nayebhabib, F., 2012, A randomized controlled trial on the hemostasis of femoral artery using topical hemostatic agent. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 18, 501–505. 12. Mack, M.J., 2001, Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 568–572. 13. McGinnis, D.E., Strup, S.E., and Gomella, L.G., 2000, Management of hemorrhage during laparoscopy. Journal of Endourology, 14, 915–920. 14. McDougall, E.M., Finley, D., Clayman, R.V., Winfield, H.N., Gill, S.I., Nakada, S.Y., Shalhav, A.L., Babayan, R.K., and Sosa, R.E., 2005, Basic urologic laparoscopy: A standardized guideline for training programs, (Linthicum, MD: the American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.). 15. Murat, F.J., Ereth, M.H., Dong, Y., Piedra, M.P., and Gettman, M.T., 2004, Evaluation of microporous polysaccharide hemospheres as a novel hemostatic agent in open partial nephrectomy: Favorable experimental results in the porcine model. The Journal of Urology, 172, 1119–1122. 16. Najarian, S., Dargahi, J., Darbemamieh, G., and Farkoush, S.H., 2012, Mechatronics in medicine: A biomedical engineering approach, (New York: McGraw-Hill Publication Co.). 17. Najarian, S., and Afshari E., 2012, Evolutions and future directions of surgical robotics: A review. International Journal of Clinical Medicine, 3, 75–82. 18. Sung, J.J.Y., Luo, D., Wu, J.C.Y., Ching, J.Y.L., Chan, F.K.L., Lau, J.Y.W., Mack, S., Ducharme, R., Okolo, P., Canto, M., Kalloo, A., and Giday, S.A., 2011, Early clinical experience of the safety and effectiveness of hemospray in achieving hemostasis in patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Endoscopy, 43, 291–295. 19. Yao, H.Y., 2004, Touch magnifying instrument applied to minimally invasive surgery [M.Sc. dissertation], (Montreal: McGill University). pp. 65. Available online at: http://www.cim.mcgill.ca/ hyyao/utactus.pdf.
Waiting