The article is based on most recent accomplishments,
conclusions and methods in World Islamic and historical
sciences. The historical-comparative method was applied
to study the sources including various manuscripts of
“Hanaf Law” and many other sources written in Arabic
that are available in the Fund of Manuscripts of the
Institute of Oriental Studies under Academy of Sciences
of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
It relies on recommendations, conclusions of
research works and the conceptions related to the history
of civilization of the Central Asia that were stated by
leading scientists of our country and foreign countries
such as Schacht Joseph, Monika Gronke, Ulrich
Rebstock, Chehata Chafk, Emile Tyan, Chalmeta P;
Carriente F, Riberta J., Asin, Jeanette A. Wakin, Michael
Thung, Wael Hallaq, Carl Brockelmann (Abū Nasr alSamarqandi, Ed. Muhammad Jasim al-Hadisi, 1987,
p.46).
The aim of the article is to illuminate the role of
literature on juridical documents in the development
of divinity science in Transoxiana in X-XIII centuries.
Moreover, to illuminate the importance of such works
in regulating the social relations of the cultural life
of our society. To highlight the historical-juridical
forms, theoretical and practical foundation of juridical
documents functioning in the world of Islam and
Transoxiana in X-XIII centuries that was the important
part of the social life.
The article is based on most recent accomplishments,
conclusions and methods in World Islamic and historical
sciences. The historical-comparative method was applied
to study the sources including various manuscripts of
“Hanaf Law” and many other sources written in Arabic
that are available in the Fund of Manuscripts of the
Institute of Oriental Studies under Academy of Sciences
of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
It relies on recommendations, conclusions of
research works and the conceptions related to the history
of civilization of the Central Asia that were stated by
leading scientists of our country and foreign countries
such as Schacht Joseph, Monika Gronke, Ulrich
Rebstock, Chehata Chafk, Emile Tyan, Chalmeta P;
Carriente F, Riberta J., Asin, Jeanette A. Wakin, Michael
Thung, Wael Hallaq, Carl Brockelmann (Abū Nasr alSamarqandi, Ed. Muhammad Jasim al-Hadisi, 1987,
p.46).
The aim of the article is to illuminate the role of
literature on juridical documents in the development
of divinity science in Transoxiana in X-XIII centuries.
Moreover, to illuminate the importance of such works
in regulating the social relations of the cultural life
of our society. To highlight the historical-juridical
forms, theoretical and practical foundation of juridical
documents functioning in the world of Islam and
Transoxiana in X-XIII centuries that was the important
part of the social life.
| № | Муаллифнинг исми | Лавозими | Ташкилот номи |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BEKMIRZAEV I.I. | Doctor of Scince of the department of Islamic studies of the INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC ACADEMY OF UZBEKISTAN | O'zbekiston xalqaro islom akademiyasi |
| № | Ҳавола номи |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1. Abū Nasr al-Samarqandi. Kitāb al-Shurūt va-‘ulūm al-sukūk / Ed. Muhammad Jasim al-Hadisi. – Bagdad: Vizārat al-saqāfa va-l-‘ilām, Dār al-shu’ūn al-saqāfyya al-‘amma, āfāq ‘arabiyya, 1407/1987. 2. Ahmad B.Mugit al-Tulaytuli (m.459/1067). Al-Muqni‘fī ‘ilm al-shurūt (formulario natarial).ed. Francisco Javier Aguirre Sadaba Madrid,1994. – 405 p; 3. Bedir M. Osmanlı Öncesi Türk Hukuk Tarihi Yazıcılığı // Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi. − Анқара, 2005. − T. 3. − № 5. − B. 27-84. 4. Burhānuddīn Mahmūd. Al-Muhīţ. Tashkent: Fund of Manuscripts. Manuscript. № 8781. P.2a. 5. Brockelmann C. Geschichte des arabischen Litteratur. − Supplementband 1. − Лейден: Brill, 1937. − 17+1+973 s. 6. Chafk T.Chehata.Theorie Generale de l’obligation en Droit Musulman, les sujets de l’obligation avec une bibliographie,une methodologie et un tableau general de la theorie de l’obligation en droit Hanefte. – Le Caire: Imp.F.E. Noury & Fils, 1936. – 367 p., 7. Chalmeta P.,Carriente F.Formularo notarial HispanoArabe por elalfaqui y notario cordobes Ibn al-Attar (sX). Madrid: Academia Matritense del Notariado Instituto Hispano-Arabe De Cultura, 1983. – pp. 6. 8. Chalmeta P., Carriente F. Formularo notarial Hispano. Madrid: 1983. − 675 p. 9. Donald. B. Little. The Haram Documents as Sources for the Arts and Architecture of the Mamluk Period. International Journal of Middle East Studies Vol.19.N.,3(Aug..,1987) pp. 337-365. 10. Emile Tyan. Le Notariat et le regime de la prevue par ecrit dans la pratique du Droit Musulman. – Lyon: Universite de Lyon, 1945. – pp. 9. 11. Emile Tyan. Histoire de L’organisation Judiciaire en Pays D’Islam. Leiden: E.J.Brill, 1960. − Б. 673; 12. Ismail Hakki Uzungarshili. Osmanli devleti teshkilatina medhal. − Ankara: Turk tarih kurumu basimevi, pp. 1984.–51. 13. Husāmuddīn al-sadr al-shahīd. Sharh adab al- qādī li-lHassāf. 4 Vol. / Ed., Mahiy Hilāl al-Sarhān. − Bagdad: Dār al-‘arab, 1397-1398/1977-78. 14. Jeanette A. Wakin. The Function of Documents in Islamic Law: The Chapters on Sales from Tahawi´s Kitab al-Shurut al-Kabir. Albany State University of New York Press, 1972. − Б. 203; 15. Madelung W. The Early Murji’a and the Spread of Hanafsm/Der Islam, 43 (1982), pp. 32-39. 16. Mahmud al-Sharbini. Al-Qadā f-l-Islam. – Cairo: AlHay’a al-misriyya al-‘amma li-l-kitāb, 1420/1999. pp. 22. 17. Michael. H. Thung. Written obligations from the 2nd/8th to the 4th/10th century. Amsterdam. Amsterdam University press.1997. 135б; 18. Michael. H. Thung. The qаdi’s diwаn(sijill) before the Ottomans. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, Vol.61, No 3. (1998). − Б. 415-436; 19. Monika Gronke. Arabische und persische Privaturkunden des 12. und 13. Jahrhunderts aus Ardabil (Aserbeidschan). Berlin: Klaus schwarz verlag.1982. − Б. 449; 20. Muhammad al-Zuhayli. Tārih al-qadā f-l Islam. – Damascus: Dār al-fkr, 1416/1995. – pp. 590. 21. Olivia Remie Constable. Cross-Cultural Contracts: Sales of Land between Christian and Muslims in 12th – Century Palermo. The Journal Studia Islamica, 1971\1(Febuar) pp/85. 22. Omeljan Pritsak. Аl-i Burhаn. Der Islam (zeitschrift für geschichte und kultur des Islamischen orients) Band 30. Berlin: Walter de gruyter & co. 1952. – pp. 81-133. 23. Riberta J., Asin M. Este formulario ha sido objeto de la tesis doctoral de dona Asuncion Ferreras Sanchez. − Paris: Universidad Complutense, 1991. − Б. 256; 24. Schacht Joseph. Das kitāb adkаr al-huqūq wal-ruhūn aus dem al-gаmi‘ al-Kabīr fī-l- shurūt des Abū Ga’far al-Tahаwī. Heidelberg: 1927. – 38. 25. Schacht Joseph. Das kitāb al-Shuf’a aus dem algаmi‘ al-Kabīr fl-Shurūt des Abū Ga’far al-Tahаwī. Heidelberg: 1930. 58 p. 26. Schacht Joseph. Das kitаb aš-Šuf’a aus dem algаmi‘ al-Kabir fš-Šurut des Abu Ga’far Ahmad ibn Muhammad al-Tahаwi. Heidelberg: Carl Winter´s Universitätsbuchhandlung, 1930. − Б. 58; 27. Shihab al-Din Muhammad b. Hajar al-’Asqalani, Talhīs al-habīr fī takhrīj ahādīth al-raf’i al-kabīr, ed. ‘Abd Allah al-Madani, 4 vols. (Madina: n.p., 1964), iv, 189; 28. Tyan Emile. Le Notariat et le regime de la prevue par ecrit dans la pratique du Droit Musulman. Lyon: Universite de Lyon, 1945. – Б. 99; 29. Ulrich Rebstock. A Qоdi’s Errors // Islamic law and society. – Leiden, 1999. – № 6. – Б. 1-38., 30. Ulrich Rebstock. Abwägen als Entscheidungshilfe in den usûl al-fqh: Die anfänge der targîh-Methode bei al-Gassоs // Der Islam (zeitschrift für geschichte und kultur des Islamischen orients) // 2003. – № 80. – Walter de Gruyter. Berlin. Б. 110-122; 31. Wael B. Hallaq, the Qādī’s dīwān (sijill) before the Ottomans // Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. – London, 1998. – № 61. – pp. 415- 436. 32. Wael.B.H. Model Shurut Works and the Dialectic of Doctirine and Practice. Jurnal, Islamic Law and Society,Vol. II. (Leiden, E.J.Brill,1995). − Б.109-134; 33. Wakin Jeanette A. The Function of Documents in Islamic Law. New York: 1972. − 203 p. |