71

The following article deals with the concept
analysis in the literary dialogue from the perspective
of Cognitive and Cultural linguistics. Cognitive and
Cultural linguistics are the modern trends of Linguistics
as a result of anthropocentric paradigm to language. In
this approach, the interaction between the language and
human is the main basis of this paradigm. Cognitive
and Cultural Linguistics have own main notions as
interdisciplinary branches of linguistic sciences and
“concept” is considered as one of basic notions of
Cognitive and Cultural linguistics as well as being the
core of attention of several interdisciplinary branches
of linguistics. In this article, concepts Beauty and Love
are analyzed according to the study with the notional,
image-bearing and evaluative layers. In this regard, two
concepts are analyzed according to dictionary defnitions
in notional level. The image-bearing and evaluative
layers are based on the features of the concept in the
extracts of literary dialogues of the texts.
 

  • Internet ҳавола
  • DOI
  • UzSCI тизимида яратилган сана 28-04-2023
  • Ўқишлар сони 71
  • Нашр санаси 11-04-2023
  • Мақола тилиIngliz
  • Саҳифалар сони6
English

The following article deals with the concept
analysis in the literary dialogue from the perspective
of Cognitive and Cultural linguistics. Cognitive and
Cultural linguistics are the modern trends of Linguistics
as a result of anthropocentric paradigm to language. In
this approach, the interaction between the language and
human is the main basis of this paradigm. Cognitive
and Cultural Linguistics have own main notions as
interdisciplinary branches of linguistic sciences and
“concept” is considered as one of basic notions of
Cognitive and Cultural linguistics as well as being the
core of attention of several interdisciplinary branches
of linguistics. In this article, concepts Beauty and Love
are analyzed according to the study with the notional,
image-bearing and evaluative layers. In this regard, two
concepts are analyzed according to dictionary defnitions
in notional level. The image-bearing and evaluative
layers are based on the features of the concept in the
extracts of literary dialogues of the texts.
 

№ Муаллифнинг исми Лавозими Ташкилот номи
1 ABDUGAFFAROVA G.. EFL teacher of the department foreign languages.EFL teacher of the department foreign languages. International Islamic Academy оf Uzbekistan
№ Ҳавола номи
1 1. Ashurova D.U, Galiyeva M.R. (2016). Stylistics of literary text. Tashkent: Turon-Iqbol. 2. Ashurova D.U, Galiyeva M.R.( 2016). Text linguistics. –Tashkent: Turon-Iqbol. 3. Dirk G. (2006). Cognitive linguistics. Berlin- New York,. 4. Eshboyeva, D. A. (2014). Effective ways in teaching English language. Актуальные проблемы гуманитарных и естественных наук, (8-1), 312-313. 5. Eshboeva, D. A. (2016). THE ESSENTIAL FEATURES OF THE LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODOLOGY. Modern Science, (6), 77-79. 6. Evans V., and Green M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburg: Edinburgh university press. 7. Evans Vyvyan & Melanie Green (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 8. Evans, Vyvyan (2007). A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 9. MacCormac E. (1985). A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor. - Cambridge: MIT Press,. 10. Vorobyov V.V. (1997). Cultural linguistics (theory and methods). 11. Арутyюнова Н. Д., Падучева Е. В. (1985). Истоки, проблемы и категории прагматики. Новое в зарубежной лингвистике. Вып. XVI. Москва: Прогресс. 12. Ашурова Д.У. (1991). Производное слово в свете коммуникативной теории языка. Ташкент. 13. Демьянко, В.З. Когнитивная лингвистика как разновидность интерпре-тирующего подхода. www. infolex.ru 14. Джумаева Н. Э., Сохибов А. Р. (2014). Педагогические термины и понятия. КАРШИ: Каршинский государственный университет. 70. 15. Кубрякова Е.С. и др. (1996). Краткий словарь когнитивных терминов. Москва: МГУ,. 245 с. 16. Маслова В.А. (2001). Лингвокультурология. Москва: Академия,. – 208 с. 17. Попова З. Д., Стернин И. А. (2007). Когнитивная лингвистика. – Москва: Восток Запад. – 314 с. 18. Степанов Ю. (1981). В поисках прагматики (проблема субъекта) – М.: Известия. 19. Шамсематова Б. Р. (2019). Метод проектов на уроках английского языка. Актуальные проблемы гуманитарных и естественных наук. №. 2. – С. 96-99. 20. Языкознание. Большой энциклопедический словарь / Гл. ред. В.Н.Ярцева. – 2-е изд. – Я41 – Москва. Большая Российская энциклопедия, 1998.
Кутилмоқда