The article provides estimates of the “material standard of living” of the world’s population by periods (life expectancy, the volume of production of consumer goods, services, and products per capita). Many scientists and experts, politicians and, statesmen who have left their mark on world history have thought about the concept of progress. Most of them supported the idea of “ progress” only from the bottom up. One described the pinnacle of progress as Chinese communism and, another called it “Western democracy.” This one-sided explanation reflects in the theory of five entities. (primitive, slavery, feudalism, capitalism and, communism or Western democracy). It emphasizes that all nations must go through these formations. The end of the twentieth century was characterized not only by the breakdown of the socialist system so “longawaited” in the West, the disappearance of the bipolar world and the emergence of world centers of power, unpredictable insane globalization with all the ensuing consequences, but, as it is obvious now, by the emergence of new, previously unseen threats and challenges not only to the sovereignty of individual countries but, above all, by threats to the existence of both each individual and by challenges to the existence of people itself. The first quarter of the 21st century, more than ever before, stuck out, exposed and, brought to the culmination point all painful problems - environmental, economic, geopolitical, socio-cultural, etc. The problem of adequate analysis and forecasting of these threats and challenges did not test, methodologically verified. The study made it possible to conclude that the issue of global and national security on earth is one of the main tasks of any state. And the understanding of the current requirements plays a principal role in preventing the emergence of a threat factor. Thus, understanding the period is one of the dominant needs in preventing the emergence of a threat factor.
The article provides estimates of the “material standard of living” of the world’s population by periods (life expectancy, the volume of production of consumer goods, services, and products per capita). Many scientists and experts, politicians and, statesmen who have left their mark on world history have thought about the concept of progress. Most of them supported the idea of “ progress” only from the bottom up. One described the pinnacle of progress as Chinese communism and, another called it “Western democracy.” This one-sided explanation reflects in the theory of five entities. (primitive, slavery, feudalism, capitalism and, communism or Western democracy). It emphasizes that all nations must go through these formations. The end of the twentieth century was characterized not only by the breakdown of the socialist system so “longawaited” in the West, the disappearance of the bipolar world and the emergence of world centers of power, unpredictable insane globalization with all the ensuing consequences, but, as it is obvious now, by the emergence of new, previously unseen threats and challenges not only to the sovereignty of individual countries but, above all, by threats to the existence of both each individual and by challenges to the existence of people itself. The first quarter of the 21st century, more than ever before, stuck out, exposed and, brought to the culmination point all painful problems - environmental, economic, geopolitical, socio-cultural, etc. The problem of adequate analysis and forecasting of these threats and challenges did not test, methodologically verified. The study made it possible to conclude that the issue of global and national security on earth is one of the main tasks of any state. And the understanding of the current requirements plays a principal role in preventing the emergence of a threat factor. Thus, understanding the period is one of the dominant needs in preventing the emergence of a threat factor.
№ | Муаллифнинг исми | Лавозими | Ташкилот номи |
---|---|---|---|
1 | DJUMAEV R. . | Doctor of political sciences, professor | Tashkent State University of Oriental Studies |
№ | Ҳавола номи |
---|---|
1 | 1. Буданов В. Г. О методологии синергетики // Вопр. философии. 2006. № 5. С. 79–94. 2. Бранский В. П. Теоретические основания социальной синергетики // Вопр. философии. 2000. № 4. С. 112–113. 3. Джумаев Р.Конфликтология.- Т.: ТДШУ.,2018 -300с. 4. Пригожин И. Философия нестабильности // Вопр. философии. 1991. № 6 С. 46–52; 5. Най Дж. Умная сила: эссе. // Политическая наука (Россия). - 2012. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/umnayasila-esse 6. Наумкин В. Снизу вверх и обратно. // Россия в глобальной политике (Россия). – 2011, №4. https:// globalaffairs.ru/articles/snizu-vverh-i-obratno/ 7. url: http://www.hist.msu.ru/Labs/HisLab/BOOKS/ chaos.htm 8. Д.Меддоуз «Пределы роста»- М.: « Инфо» ,1972 –С.21-468. 9. Д.Меддоуз и Й. Рандерс «За пределами роста»- М.: « Инфо» ,1992 –100с. 10. Манойло А.В. Технологии управления политическими конфликтами в революциях на Ближнем Востоке и в Северной Африке. // ПОЛИТЭКС (Россия). - 2012, Том 8, № 1. - С. 131-154. 11. Средний Восток. // Мировая цифровая библиотека, 17.06.2020. https://www.wdl.org/ru/item/11742/ 12. Средний Восток. // Официальный сайт ЮНЕСКО, 17.06.2020. http://vocabularies.unesco.org/browser/ thesaurus/es/page/concept850?clang=ru 13. Хантингтон С. Третья волна. Демократизация в конце XX века. – М.: Российская политическая энциклопедия (РОССПЭН), 2003. – 368 с. 14. Ashby W. R. Principles of the Self-organizing Dynamic System // Journal General Psychology. 1947. N 37. P. 125–128. 15. Brown N. Democratic Dilemma. // Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (USA), December 01, 2011. https://carnegieendowment.org/2011/12/01/muslimbrotherhood-s-democratic-dilemma/8kqi 16. Buzan B. People, States, and Fear. – Brighton: Wheatsheaf, 1983. 262 p. 17. Buzan B. and Waever O. Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security. – Cambridge University Press, 2003.564 p. 18. Buzan B. People, States, and Fear. – Brighton: Wheatsheaf, 1983., - P. 106 19. Deterring hybrid warfare: a chance for NATO and the EU to work together? // NATO Review (Belgium), 2014. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/2014/Also-in-2014/ Deterring-hybrid-warfare/EN/index.htm 20. Djumayev R.Z. On some management concepts in world politics // ”Sharqshunoslik”, 2020, № 2. – 15 р. 21. Hans Morgenthau and Kenneth Thompson, Politics Among Nations, 6th edition, New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005.752 р. 22. Nye J. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics – Public Affairs, 2009. – 208 p. – Р. 73 23. Frank G. Hoffman. Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, Arlington, Virginia.December 2007. http://www. projectwhitehorse.com/pdfs/HybridWar_0108.pdf 24. Full text of joint statement on UAE and Israel normalizing ties. // Arab News, 01.09.2020. https://www. arabnews.com/node/1718951/middle-east 25. Euro-Mediterranean Agreement, establishing an Association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Arab Republic of Egypt, of the other part. Text. // EUR-Lex, 17.06.2020. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2004.304.01.0038.01.ENG&toc=OJ:L:2004:304:FULL#L_2004304EN.01003901 26. Qo’ysinova, Fazilat (2020) “STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE ORGANIZATION OF ISLAMIC COOPERATION (1969-1990),” The Light of Islam: Vol. 2020 : Iss. 4 , Article 8. Available at: https://uzjournals.edu.uz/iiau/vol2020/ iss4/8 27. Kuysinova, Fazilat Oripovna. “THE ROLE AND POLITICAL IMIDGE OF THE ORGANIZATION OF THE ISLAMIC CONFERENCE IN THE INTERNATIONAL RELATIONSHIP SYSTEM.” Bulletin Social-Economic and Humanitarian Research 2 (2019): 61-68. |