71

This article presents the results of theoretical studies of the undershot water
wheel that works effectively in low-pressure watercourses with a water flow speed of 1-4 m/s. When
developing a mathematical model of the undershot water wheel, the Matlab/Simulink program was
used. According to the results of the study, it was found that for the efficient operation of the
undershot water wheel in low-pressure watercourses, the angle of inclination of the blade at the
exit from the water is β=30°. Also, during the study, the water flow rate and the efficiency of the
undershot water wheel were determined.

  • Internet ҳавола
  • DOI
  • UzSCI тизимида яратилган сана 15-09-2024
  • Ўқишлар сони 71
  • Нашр санаси 03-07-2023
  • Мақола тилиIngliz
  • Саҳифалар сони64-71
English

This article presents the results of theoretical studies of the undershot water
wheel that works effectively in low-pressure watercourses with a water flow speed of 1-4 m/s. When
developing a mathematical model of the undershot water wheel, the Matlab/Simulink program was
used. According to the results of the study, it was found that for the efficient operation of the
undershot water wheel in low-pressure watercourses, the angle of inclination of the blade at the
exit from the water is β=30°. Also, during the study, the water flow rate and the efficiency of the
undershot water wheel were determined.

№ Муаллифнинг исми Лавозими Ташкилот номи
1 Uzoqov G.N. t.f.d., prof. QarMII
2 Mamedov R.A. doktorant BuxMTI
3 Safarov A.B. t.f.f.d., dots. BuxMTI
4 Hatamov I.A. o'qituvchi QarMII
№ Ҳавола номи
1 Sadullayev N N Safarov A B Nematov Sh N Mamedov R A Abdujabarov A B 2020 Opportunities and prospects for the use of renewable energy sources in Bukhara region. Applied solar energy Vol. 56 № 4 P 410-421
2 Celso P 2004 Guide on How to Develop a Small Hydropower Plant European Small Hydropower Association – ESHA Vol 2 № 7 P 43-49
3 Renewables 2020 Global Status Report Retrieved from: https://www.ren21.net/wpcontent/uploads/2019/05/GSR2021_Full_Report.pdf
4 Nicolet C Zobeiri A Maruzewski P Avellan F 2011 Experimental Investigations on Upper Part Load Vortex Rope Pressure Fluctuations in Francis Turbine Draft Tube. International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems Vol 4 № 1 P 179-190
5 Vu T Koller M Gauthier M Deschenes C 2011Flow simulation and efficiency hill chart prediction for a Propeller turbine. International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems Vol 4 № 2 P 243-254
6 Kodirov D Tursunov O 2019 Calculation of Water Wheel Design Parameters for Micro Hydroelectric Power Station. E3S Web of Conferences 97 P 1-11
7 Sadullayev N N Safarov A B Mamedov R A Kodirov D 2020 Assessment wind and hydropower potential of Bukhara region. ―1st International Conference on Energetics, Civil and Agricultural Engineering‖ P 1-8
8 Butera I Balestra R 2015 Estimation of the hydropower potential of irrigation networks. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews P 140-151
9 Khamitov T G Mukhammadiev M M Klychev Sh I 2009 Technical and economic characteristics of small hydro power plants. Applied Solar Energy (English translation of Geliotekhnika) 45(4) P 307-308
10 2021 Hydropower Status Report Retrieved from: https://www.hydropower.org/publications/2021-hydropower-status-report
11 Mamedov R A 2021 Calculations of the resources of the gross hydropower potential of the Amu-Bukhara Canal using one-point and two-point methods. International scientific and technical conference: "Trends in the development of alternative and renewable energy: problems and solutions" Tashkent P 202-209
12 Mamedov R A Safarov A B Charyeva M R 2021 Analysis of the dependence of the Chezi coefficient in assessing the resources of the hydropower potential of irrigation canals in the Bukhara region. Scientific and technical journal "Alternative Energy" №1 P 52-60
13 W Müller 1899 Die Eisernen Wasserräder - Berechnung, Konstruktion und Wirkungsgrad (University of Wisconsin – Madison Germany) 167
14 Matthias H 2018 Analyse des Zuppinger-Wasserrades – Hydraulische Optimierungen unter Berücksichtigung ökologischer Aspekte (Universität Stuttgart Germany) 192
15 . Mukhammadiev M M Mamadiyarov E K Urishev B U Mukhammadiev S M 2012 Technological model of micro power facilities based on renewable energy sources with the energy storage. Applied Solar Energy (English translation of Geliotekhnika) 48(2) P 152-156
16 Adanta D Kurnianto M 2020 Effect of the number of blades on undershot waterwheel performance for straight blades. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science – Germany 431 P 1-6
17 Quaranta E Müller G 2018 Sagebien and Zuppinger water wheels for very low head hydropower applications. Journal of Hydraulic Research P 1-11
18 Nuembergk D M Trostdorf F Treiber G 2009 Untersuchung zum Wirkungsgrad eines Zuppinger-Wasserrades mit einer kreisförmigen Überfallschütze. Wasserbaukolloquium 2009: Wasserkraft im Zeichen des Klimawandels Dresdener Wasserbauliche Mitteilungen Р 359-368
19 Denny M 2004 The efficiency of overshot and undershot water wheels. European journal of physics 25 P 193–202
20 Kodirov D Tursunov O Khushiev S Bozarov O Tashkhodjaeva G Mirzaev S 2020 Mathematical description of water flow quantity for microhydroelectric station. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science P 1-9
Кутилмоқда