102

Challenging debates whether financial development effects the economic growth have been the subject of the researches during many years. The authors of scientific theoretical and empirical studies on this topic eventually came to contradictory results. Some authors have argued that the state of the financial system can cause economic growth, while others have suggested that economic growth is the main factor in the development of the financial system. The third group of authors have agreed with both views, indicating the existence of a causal relationship between the two systems, while the fourth group of authors completely have rejected any links between the two systems. The authors of the following article decided to explore this topic on their own. According to the authors’ approach, the issue is examined on the example of separate CIS countries. The paper employs the panel data to gain the advantage of both cross-country and time-series data. All the data which are used in the paper are secondary and are obtained from World Bank Development Indicators for the period 1996–2015. A dynamic panel evaluation of the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) has been used as an econometric approach. The results of the research have shown that financial development has a positive and important impact on economic growth in the countries studied. The research concludes the following: any improvement in the financial systems of the countries reviewed, such as the development of the banking sector, the effectiveness of financial intermediation, favorable conditions in the stock market, etc., lead to an increase in overall economic activity and production levels.

  • Ссылка в интернете
  • DOI
  • Дата создание в систему UzSCI 01-02-2022
  • Количество прочтений 102
  • Дата публикации 06-08-2018
  • Язык статьиIngliz
  • Страницы14
Ўзбек

Молиявий ривожланишнинг иқтисодий ўсишга таъсири концепцияси кўп йиллардан буён жаҳон иқтисодий адабиётида кенг муҳокама қилинмоқда. Мавзу бўйича назарий ва эмпирик тадқиқот ишларининг натижалари бир-биридан фарқ қиладиган турли хулосаларга асос бўлгани аниқланди. Биринчи гуруҳ олимлари молиявий тараққиёт иқтисодий ўсишни рағбатлантирувчи омил деб ҳисобласа, иккинчи гуруҳдаги тадқиқотчилар аксинча, иқтисодий ривожланиш молиявий тараққиётга туртки беради, деб уқтиришади. Учинчи гуруҳ олимлари иқтисодий ва молиявий тараққиёт ўзаро бир-бирига таъсир кўрсатади деган ғояни қўллаб-қувватласа, тўртинчи гуруҳдаги тадқиқотчилар молиявий ва иқтисодий тизимлар ўртасида ўзаро боғлиқлик йўқ, деб эътироф этишади. Мақола муаллифлари мунозарали ушбу масалани Мустақил Давлатлар Ҳамдўстлиги (МДҲ)га кирувчи айрим мамлакатлар мисолида, мустақил равишда тадқиқ қилишга уринишди. Методологик нуқтаи назардан тадқиқотларимиз фойдали ва аниқ бўлиши учун биз турли давлатлар бўйича ва муайян вақт ўлчамлари кесимидаги маълумотларни ўзаро таққослашда панель маълумотларидан фойдаландик. Тадқиқот давомида фойдаланилган барча статистика маълумотлари иккиламчи бўлиб, бирламчи ахборотлар манбаи бўлмиш Жаҳон Банкининг 1996–2015 йиллар оралиғидаги ривожланиш кўрсаткичларига асосланган. Эконометрик ёндашув сифатида Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) динамик панель таҳлил (муайян даврий ўлчамларда кузатилган алоҳида вақт кесимларида олиб ўрганилган кўрсаткичлар таҳлили) методидан фойдаланилди. Тадқиқот объекти сифатида танлаб олинган давлатларнинг иқтисодий ривожланиш натижалари шуни кўрсатадики, молиявий тизим негизидаги ҳар қандай ижобий ўзгаришлар (банк тизимининг ривожланиши, молиявий воситачилик инструментларининг самарали ишлаши, фонд бозоридаги қулай шарт-шароитлар ва ҳ.к.) пировардида иқтисодий тизимнинг ривожланишига ҳам таъсир этади. Бу ҳол, ўз навбатида, умумий иқтисодий фаолликни ҳамда ишлаб чиқариш даражасининг ошишига олиб келади.

Русский

В течение многих лет на страницах экономической литературы между разными авторами ведется полемика о том влияет ли финансовое развитие на экономический рост. Авторы научно -теоретических и эмпирических исследований по этой теме в итоге пришли к противоречивым результатам. Некоторые авторы убеждали в том, что состояние финансовой системы может вызывать экономический рост, тогда как другие предположили, что экономический рост является основным фактором развития финансовой системы. Третья группа авторов согласились с обоими взглядами, указывая на наличие причинно-следственной связи между этими двумя системами, в то время как четвертая группа авторов вовсе отвергали любые связи между двумя системами. Авторы настоящей статьи решили самостоятельно исследовать эту тему. Согласно авторскому подходу обсуждаемый вопрос рассматривается на примере отдельных стран СНГ. Методологически в статье используются панельные данные, чтобы получить преимущество как по межстрановым, так и по временным рядам. Все данные, используемые в документе, являются вторичными и получены из показателей развития Всемирного банка за период 1996–2015 годы. В качестве эконометрического подхода используется динамическая панельная оценка обобщенного метода моментов (GMM). Результаты наших исследований показали, что финансовое развитие оказывает позитивное и важное влияние на экономический рост в изучаемых странах. Из полученных результатов мы вывели следующий тезис: в рассмотренных в качестве объекта странах СНГ любое улучшение финансовых систем, такие как развитие банковского сектора, эффективность финансового посредничества, благоприятные условия на фондовом рынке и т.д., приводит к повышению общей экономической активности и уровня производства.

English

Challenging debates whether financial development effects the economic growth have been the subject of the researches during many years. The authors of scientific theoretical and empirical studies on this topic eventually came to contradictory results. Some authors have argued that the state of the financial system can cause economic growth, while others have suggested that economic growth is the main factor in the development of the financial system. The third group of authors have agreed with both views, indicating the existence of a causal relationship between the two systems, while the fourth group of authors completely have rejected any links between the two systems. The authors of the following article decided to explore this topic on their own. According to the authors’ approach, the issue is examined on the example of separate CIS countries. The paper employs the panel data to gain the advantage of both cross-country and time-series data. All the data which are used in the paper are secondary and are obtained from World Bank Development Indicators for the period 1996–2015. A dynamic panel evaluation of the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) has been used as an econometric approach. The results of the research have shown that financial development has a positive and important impact on economic growth in the countries studied. The research concludes the following: any improvement in the financial systems of the countries reviewed, such as the development of the banking sector, the effectiveness of financial intermediation, favorable conditions in the stock market, etc., lead to an increase in overall economic activity and production levels.

Имя автора Должность Наименование организации
1 Xadjieva I.S. Universitetgacha bo'lgan bo'limda MMA (Miqdoriy malakalar asoslari) ilmiy xodimi Toshkentdagi Xalqaro Vestminster universiteti
2 Xamrahudjaev N.Y. PhD, bosh mutaxassis O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Vazirlar Mahkamasi
Название ссылки
1 Acaravci, A., Ozturk, I. and Songul K., (2007). “Finance-Growth Nexus: Evidence from Turkey”, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Vol: 11, pp. 30–40.
2 Anthony, E., Akinlo. and Egbetunde,N., (2010). “Financial Developmet and Economic Growth: Experience of 10 Sub-Saharan African Countries”. The Review of Finance and Banking , Vol. 2, No. 1, 2010, pp. 17–28.
3 Kiran B., Nilgun, C. Yavuz, Burak Guris. “Financial Development and Economic Growth: A Panel Data Analysis of Emerging Countries”. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics. Vol. 30, 2009.
4 De Gregorio, J., and Guidotti, P.E. (1995). “Financial Development and Economic Growth”, World Development, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1995, pp. 433–448.
5 Loesse.E.J. (2010). “Re-examining the Finance-Growth Nexus: Structural Break, Threshold Cointegration and Causality Evidence from the ECOWAS”, Journal of Economic Development. Vol. 35, No. 3.
6 Graff. G., (2003). “Financial development and Economic Growth in Corporatist and Liberal Market Economies” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, March–April 2003, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 47–69.
7 Al-Khouri. R.S., (2007). “Financial Sector Development and Sustainable Economic Growth in Regionally Cointegrated Emerging Markets”, Advances in Financial Economics. Vol. 12, 2007, pp. 345–360.
8 Robert King and Ross Levine., (1993). “Finance and Growth: Schumpeter Might Be Right” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 108, No. 3, pp. 717–737
9 Ross Levine and Sara Zervos.(1996). “Stock Market Development and Long-Run Growth” The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 323–339.
10 Ross Levine, (1997). “Financial Development and Economic Growth” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 688–726.
11 Ross Levine, Beck Thorsten, Demirguc Kunt, Luc Laeven, (2008). “Finance, Firm Size and Growth” Journal of Money, Credit, Banking, Vol. 40, No. 7, pp. 1379–1405.
12 Richard Blundell and Stephen Bond.(1998). “Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models”, Journal of Econometrics. Vol. 87, No. 1, pp. 115–143.
13 Alonso-Borrego C., and Arellano M., (1994). Symmetrically Normalized Instrument-Variable Estimation using Panel Data. [online] Available from:
14 Asongu, S. A., (2011). Finance and Growth: Schumpeter Might Be Wrong in our Era. New Evidence from Meta-analysis. [online] Available from:
15 Beck T., Demirguc-Kunt A., Levine R., and Maksimovic V., (2000). Financial Structure and Economic Development: Firm, Industry, and Country Evidence. [online] Available from:
16 FitzGerald V., (2006). Financial Development and Economic Growth: A Critical View. Oxford University. [online] Available from:
17 Kar M., and Pentecost E., (2000). Financial Development and Economic Growth in Turkey: FurtherEvidence on the Causality Issue. Loughborough University. [online] Available from:
18 Khan M., and Senhadji A., (2000). Financial Development and Economic Growth: An Overview. International Monetary Fund. [online] Available from:
19 Kiran B., Yavuz N., and Guris B., (2009). Financial Development and Economic Growth: A Panel Data Analysis of Emerging Countries. Istanbul University. [online] Available from:
20 Levine R., Loayza N., and Beck T., (1999). Financial Intermediation and Growth: Causality and Causes. University of Virginia. [online] Available from: < www.bcentral.cl/eng/studies/workingpapers/pdf/dtbc56.pdf>
21 Patrick H. T., (1966). Financial Development and Economic Growth in Underdeveloped Countries. The University of Chicago. [online] Available from:
В ожидании