146

In this study, the effects of solar radiation current density (SRCD), ambient temperature, and wind speed on a 340 W monocrystalline silicon-based photovoltaic battery and two reflector photothermal batteries cooled by different water flows of the same capacity were studied.The results showed that the short-circuit current of the batteries increased significantly with increasing solar radiation current density, while the open-circuit voltage was the least affected. A wind speed of 3-4 m/s and a relatively low temperature of 15-16oC ensured that the PEB's open circuit voltage was maintained at its initial state. A decrease in PEB short-circuit current, output power, and efficiency was observed as the temperature increased above 16oC. The effects of temperature and wind on the PTB were not noticed, and the open circuit voltage, power, and efficiency of the PTB increased during the experiment until the solar radiation flux density reached a maximum. The average efficiency is 17.67% for PEB, 20.17% for PTB cooled with a water flow of 0.033 l/sec, and 20.81% for the PTB cooled with a water flow rate of 0.11 l/sec

  • Ссылка в интернете
  • DOI
  • Дата создание в систему UzSCI 07-12-2023
  • Количество прочтений 146
  • Дата публикации 23-10-2023
  • Язык статьиIngliz
  • Страницы74-81
English

In this study, the effects of solar radiation current density (SRCD), ambient temperature, and wind speed on a 340 W monocrystalline silicon-based photovoltaic battery and two reflector photothermal batteries cooled by different water flows of the same capacity were studied.The results showed that the short-circuit current of the batteries increased significantly with increasing solar radiation current density, while the open-circuit voltage was the least affected. A wind speed of 3-4 m/s and a relatively low temperature of 15-16oC ensured that the PEB's open circuit voltage was maintained at its initial state. A decrease in PEB short-circuit current, output power, and efficiency was observed as the temperature increased above 16oC. The effects of temperature and wind on the PTB were not noticed, and the open circuit voltage, power, and efficiency of the PTB increased during the experiment until the solar radiation flux density reached a maximum. The average efficiency is 17.67% for PEB, 20.17% for PTB cooled with a water flow of 0.033 l/sec, and 20.81% for the PTB cooled with a water flow rate of 0.11 l/sec

№ Название ссылки
1 1. O.K. Ahmed., R.W. Daoud., S.M. Bawa., A.H. Ahmed. Optimization of PV/T Solar Water Collector based on Fuzzy Logic Control. “International journal renew. Energy Dev”, 2020. 303.
2 2. M.M. Ligavo., H.B. Wafula., M. Mageto. The Effect of Irradiance and Temperature on the Performance of Monocrystalline Silicon Solar Module in Kakamega. “Physical Science International Journal”, 2018. 9
3 3. D.H. Muhsen., T. Khatib., H.T. Haider. A feasibility andload sensitivity analysis of photovoltaic water pumping system with battery and diesel generator. “Energy conversion and management”, 2017. 287.
4 4. A.J. Carr., T.L. Pryor. A comparison of the performance of different PV module types in temperate climates. “Solar Energy”, 2004. 285.
5 5. G.N. Tiwari., S. Dubey. “Fundamental of photovoltaic modules and their applications”, 2010.
6 6. C. Bhalchandra., Y. Sadawarte. The factors affecting the performance of solar cell. International conference on quality upgrading in engineering. “Science and technology”, 2015. 76
7 7. H. Teo., P. Lee., M. Hawlader. An active cooling system for photovoltaic modules. “Appl. Energy”, 2012. 309.
8 8. M.M. Awad., O.K. Ahmed., N.T. Alwan., S.J. Yaqoob., A. Nayyar., M. Abouhawwash. Photovoltaic thermal collectors integrated with phase changematerials: A Comprehensive Analysis. “Electronics”, 2022. 337. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11030337
9 9. S.M. Salih., Y.K. Jabur., L.A. Kadhim. Analysis of temperature effect on a crystalline silicon photovoltaic module performance. Transactions applications. “International Journal of Engineering”, 2016. 29.
10 10. M.N. Tursunov., X. Sabirov., U.R. Xolov., M. Eshmatov. Investigation of the parameters of a photovoltaic thermal batteryin extreme natural conditions. “Applied Solar Energy”, 2021. 272.
11 11. M.N. Tursunov., H. Sabirov., M.M. Eshmatov., Т.Z. Аkhtamov. Mobil photovoltaic well water lifting system for hot climate. Proceedings of the electronic research conference “International scientific solutions 2022”, New York: “Infinity publishing”, 2022. 149.
12 12. M. Habiballahi., M. Ameri., S.H. Mansouri. Efficiency improvement of photovoltaic water pumping systems by means of water flow beneath photovoltaic cells surface. “Journall of solar energy engineering”, 2015. 137.
13 13. R.A. Muminov., M. N. Tursunov., X. Sabirov., T.Z. Axtamov., M.M. Eshmatov. Comprehensive improvement of the efficiency of a mobile photovoltaic installation for water lifting throughthe use of photothermal batteries, side reflectors of solar radiatio and cooling water from deep underground aquifer. “Applied Solar Energy”, 2022. 238.
14 14. M.Q. Al-Odat. Experimental Study of temperature influence on the performance of PV/T cell under Jordan climate conditions. “Journal of ecological engineering” 2022. 80.
15 15. K. Hongyu., L. Mingzhe., H. Kuang. Analysis of photoelectric conversion efficiency of space laser energytransfer based on temperature rise effect. “IOP conference series: Earth and environmental science”, 2019. 237
16 16. C.O. Julie., O.N. Armstrong., M.K. Panjwani., S.K. Panjwani. The impact of high temperature and irradiance sourceon the efficiency of polycrystalline photovoltaic panelin a controlled environment. “International Journalof Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE)”, 2020. 3942.
17 17. H.R. Nils., B. Mueller., A. Armbruster., G.J. Wilfried., H.M. van Sark., K. Kiefer., R. Christian. Performance ratio revisited: is PR > 90% realistic. “Progress in photovoltaics: research and applications”, 2012. 717. DOI: 10.1002/pip.1219.
18 18. D.M. Tobnaghi., D. Naderi. The effect of solar radiation and temperature on solar cells performance. “Extensive journal of applied sciences”, 2015. 39.
19 19. D.M. Tobnaghi., R. Madatov., D. Naderi. The effect of temperature on electrical parameters of solar cells. “International journal of advance research in electrical, electronics and instrumentation engineering”, 2013. 6404.
20 20. V.J. Fesharaki., M. Dehghani., J.J. Fesharaki. The effect of temperature on photovoltaic cell efficiency. “International conference on emerging trends in energy conservation”, 2011.
21 21. A.R. Amelia., Y.M. Irwan., W.Z. Leow., M. Irwanto., I. Safwati., M. Zhafarina. Investigation of the effect temperature on photovoltaic (PV) panel output performance. “International journal on advanced science engineering information technology”, 2016. 682.
В ожидании