264

The article covers the issue of genre heterogeneity of the 20th century American science fiction (SF).  It  is  argued  that  American  SF  of  that  period  was  represented  mainly  by  three  subgenres: hard SF, socio-philosophical SF, and adventurous SF, that differ from each other not only in structure/content, but also in terms of genre. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that genre approach has been applied to classify American science fiction of the 20th century.

  • Количество прочтений255
  • Дата публикации03-10-2019
  • Язык статьиIngliz
  • Страницы214-223
Ўзбек

Мазкур  мақолада  АҚШ  XX  аср  илмий  фантастикасининг  хилма-хилл иги ўрганилган. Ўша даврдаги Америка илмий фантастикасини асосан қуйидаги учта кичик жанрлар  мужассам  этади:  барқарор  илмий  фантастика,  ижтимоий-фалсафий  илмий фантастика  ва  саргузашт  илмий  фантастика.  Улар  нафақат  структура  ва  мазмун жиҳатидан, балки жанраспектлари бўйича ҳам фарқланади. Мазкур тадқиқотнинг илмий янгилиги  ХХ  аср  Америка  илмий  фантастикасини  классификация  қилишда  жанрий ёндашувни қўллашдан иборат.

Русский

В статье рассматривается вопрос разнородности американской научной фантастики (НФ) XXвека.  Американскую  научную  фантастику  того  периода  в  основном представляют три поджанра: твёрдая НФ, социально-философская НФ и приключенческая НФ,  — которые различаются не только по структуре и содержанию, но и в жанровом аспекте. Новизна данного исследования заключается в применении жанрового подхода при классификации американской научной фантастики XX века. 

English

The article covers the issue of genre heterogeneity of the 20th century American science fiction (SF).  It  is  argued  that  American  SF  of  that  period  was  represented  mainly  by  three  subgenres: hard SF, socio-philosophical SF, and adventurous SF, that differ from each other not only in structure/content, but also in terms of genre. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that genre approach has been applied to classify American science fiction of the 20th century.

№ Имя автора Должность Наименование организации
1 AHMEDOV R.S. Катта ўқитувчи, Инглиз тили ва адабиёти кафедраси Гулистон Давлат Университети
№ Название ссылки
1 Aksenova, N., Khatyamova, M. (2017). Zamyatin’s Reception of Wells’s Fiction. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 19(1), 1-8. doi: 10.7771/1481-4374.2779
2 Avin, S., Wintle, B. C., Weitzdorfer, J., Heigeartaigh, S. S., Sutherland, W. J., & Rees, M. J. (2018). Classifying Global CatastrophicRisks. Futures, 102,20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2018.02.001
3 Beata, D. T. (2018). Literature of Popular Science in North-America. International Journal of Language and Literature, 6(2), 18-24. doi: 10.15640/ijll.v6n2a4
4 Canavan, G. (2014). Science Fiction in the USA. In P. Wald & M. Elliot (Eds.), The American Novel: 1870-1940 (pp.370-385). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
5 D’Ammassa, D. (2005). Encyclopedia of Science Fiction. The Essential Guide to the Lives and Works of Science Fiction Writers. New York, NY: Fact on File
6 De Witt, D. K. (2010). Difference Engine: Aliens, Robots, and Other Racial Matters in the History of Science Fiction. Science Fiction Studies, 37(1), 16-22. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40649582
7 Fenech, D., Gradwohl, Ch., & Westren-Doll, J. (2010). Does Science Fiction Predict the Future or Change It? JUMP, 1, 1-51.
8 Gerhard, J. (2018). Post-Utopian Science Fiction in Postmodern American and Russian Literatures (doctoral dissertation). University of Colorado at Boulder, CO, USA. Retrieved from https://scholar.colorado.edu/coml_gradetds/50
9 Hamdan, Sh. I., Vengadasamy, R., Hashim, R. S., & Yusof, N. M. (2011). Creating Awareness of Real Life Issues through Science Fiction. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18, 415-419. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.061
10 Rutten, K., Soetaert, R., & Vandermeersche G. (2011). Science Fiction and a Rhetorical Analysis of the ‘Literature Myth’. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 13(1), 1-10. doi: 10.7771/1481-4374.1709
11 Suvin, D. (1979). Metamorphoses of Science Fiction. On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12 Tamarchenko, N. D. (2008). Dictionary of actual terms and notions.Moscow, Russia: Intrada.
13 Wedemeyer, A. E. (2014). Technology, Cognition, and Narrative: Literary Explorations in Neuromancer, Snow Crash, Galatea 2.2, Accelerando, and Embassytown(doctoral dissertation). University of Colorado at Boulder, CO, USA. Retrieved from https://scholar.colorado.edu/engl_gradetds/67
14 Wilson R. G. (2014). You Can’t Get There from Here: Movement SF and the Picaresque(doctoral dissertation). University of Arkansas at Fayetteville, AR, USA. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/2337223
В ожидании