Metaphor used to be regarded as the rhetorical figure par excellence, but it has now come to be seen as one of the foundations of all language and its use, being constitutive of meaning, normal, grounded in experience, and offering guidance to linguistic expression. The new view holds that metaphor may still be exploited for rhetorical purposes, but stylistic approaches to metaphor in style also examine less deliberate patterns of usage. Manifestations of metaphor vary across linguistic form, meaning, and function, and may be described with reference to specific utterances as well as to more general patterns of language use.
| № | Muallifning F.I.Sh. | Lavozimi | Tashkilot nomi |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karjawbaev O.E. | Bachelor degree of the faculty of English linguistics 2-nd year student | Karakalpak State University named after Berdakh |
| 2 | Toleubayeva A.O. | Scientific advisor | Karakalpak State University named after Berdakh |
| № | Havola nomi |
|---|---|
| 1 | Charteris-Black, Jonathan. (2005). Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. London: PalgraveMacmillan.2.Means, David. (2005). “The Secret Goldfish.” in The Best American Short Stories, ed. Katrina Kenison and Michael Chabon, Boston:Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 3.Renton, N. E. (1990).Metaphorically Speaking, A Dictionary of 3,800 Picturesque Idiomatic Expressions. New York: Warner Books.4.Ricoeur, Paul. (1977). The Rule of Metaphor: The Creation of Meaning in Language London: University of Toronto Press.5.Умарова Д.К.,Жабборова Д.Ш.,Мирзаева М.Р. Ролевые игры в обучении иностранным языкам. Журнал научных публикации аспирантов и докторантов 107-111 |