This article deals with the historical development of anthroponyms, which was evaluating during many centuries. English proper names have a long history of development and functionalizing. What is more, national features of proper names find their reflection in the anthroponomical formula. Proper names, functionalizing at the current stage in English language, were created and borrowed from various sources and entered the system of proper by names gradually.
This article deals with the historical development of anthroponyms, which was evaluating during many centuries. English proper names have a long history of development and functionalizing. What is more, national features of proper names find their reflection in the anthroponomical formula. Proper names, functionalizing at the current stage in English language, were created and borrowed from various sources and entered the system of proper by names gradually.
| № | Muallifning F.I.Sh. | Lavozimi | Tashkilot nomi |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baymirzaeva M.R. | Teacher | National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo UlugbekTashkent, Uzbekistan |
| 2 | Ismailova R.S. | Teacher | National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo UlugbekTashkent, Uzbekistan |
| № | Havola nomi |
|---|---|
| 1 | Керова Л.В. Личные имена в английском и немецком языках: Лингво-культурологический асрект. Донецк. 2019 Чичагов В.К. Из истории русских имен отчеств и фамилий. Москва. Учпедгиз, 1959. 3.Виноградов В.В. О языке художественной литературы. М.: Гослитиздат, 1959.4.Бестужев Лада И.В. Имя человеческое прошлое, настоящее, будущее.5.Лахно А.В. Имя собственное как объект сопоставительного исследования.6.Суперанская А.В. Общая теория имени собственного. Москва. Наука, 1973. 7.Якобсон Р.О. Структурализм: «за» и «против».М., 1975. 8.Jakobson R.O. Structuralism: “For” and “Against”. Moscow. 19759.Superanskaya A.V. General Theory of the Proper Name. Moscow. Nauka Publ.197310.Jespersen O. “Language: Its nature, development and origin”. London: Allen & Unwin. 1922 |