This article talks about the methodology of teaching foreign languages in Uzbekistan. The author, relying on philological data and written sources, studied the existing peculiarities on the subject, which made clarifications on the basis of existing scientific literature. The article presented four methods of learning foreign languages: the grammar and translation method, the direct method, the audiolingual method, and the communicative method. Each method has been described in terms of its characteristics and approaches to language teaching. Opinions from linguists have been included to offer a critical view on each method. The grammar and translation method emphasizes reading and writing, the direct method focuses on oral communication and natural languageacquisition, the audiolingual method values repetition and memorization, while the communicative method values meaningful communication and social interaction. From the presentation of the methods and the opinions of linguists, it was possible to understand the implications of each method in the teaching of foreign languages
This article talks about the methodology of teaching foreign languages in Uzbekistan. The author, relying on philological data and written sources, studied the existing peculiarities on the subject, which made clarifications on the basis of existing scientific literature. The article presented four methods of learning foreign languages: the grammar and translation method, the direct method, the audiolingual method, and the communicative method. Each method has been described in terms of its characteristics and approaches to language teaching. Opinions from linguists have been included to offer a critical view on each method. The grammar and translation method emphasizes reading and writing, the direct method focuses on oral communication and natural languageacquisition, the audiolingual method values repetition and memorization, while the communicative method values meaningful communication and social interaction. From the presentation of the methods and the opinions of linguists, it was possible to understand the implications of each method in the teaching of foreign languages
| № | Muallifning F.I.Sh. | Lavozimi | Tashkilot nomi |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dauletmuratova . . | doktorant | ukus State Pedagogical Institute Named After Ajiniyaz |
| № | Havola nomi |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1.BERLITZ, M. Método Berlitz para o ensino de línguas modernas. Nova York: Berlitz Publishing Company, 1914.2.BROWN, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. Pearson Education. 3.ELIOT, C.W. (1909). The Teaching of Modern Foreign Languages in the United States. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. 4.HARMER, Jeremy. The practice of English language teaching. 4. ed. Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2007.5.HENDERSON, I. (2016). The Grammar Translation Method: Not as Bad as You Think. The Language Teacher, 40(5), 33-36. 6.HOWATT, A. P. R. A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984. 7.KRASHEN, S. (1989). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Prentice Hall. 8.LARSEN-FREEMAN, Diane. Techniques and principles in language teaching. 3. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. 9.RICHARDS, Jack C. Approaches and methods in language teaching. 3. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. 10.RICHARDS, J. C., & RODGERS, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. 11.Caleb Gattegno (1963) "Teaching foreign languages in schools –The Silent Way," Educational Solutions, New York.12.Alex Faicknev Osborn. Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem SolvingNew York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1953. |