This study examines the role of international organizations in managing water resources in Central Asia from a geopolitical and institutional perspective. It evaluates the contributions of key organizations such as the UN, World Bank, and OSCE, identifies the challenges faced, and proposes policy recommendations for enhancing regional cooperation and sustainability. The mixed-methods approach includes qualitative case studies, interviews, and quantitative surveys to provide a comprehensive analysis of the impact and effectiveness of international interventions.
This study examines the role of international organizations in managing water resources in Central Asia from a geopolitical and institutional perspective. It evaluates the contributions of key organizations such as the UN, World Bank, and OSCE, identifies the challenges faced, and proposes policy recommendations for enhancing regional cooperation and sustainability. The mixed-methods approach includes qualitative case studies, interviews, and quantitative surveys to provide a comprehensive analysis of the impact and effectiveness of international interventions.
| № | Muallifning F.I.Sh. | Lavozimi | Tashkilot nomi |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DJALILOVA M.. | PhD | University of world economy and diplomacyTashkent |
| № | Havola nomi |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1.Micklin, P. (2007). The Aral Sea Disaster. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 35, 47-72.2.Mosello, B. (2008). Water in Central Asia: A Prospect of Conflict or Cooperation? Journal of Public and International Affairs, 19, 151-174.3.Sehring, J. (2009). Path Dependencies and Institutional Bricolage in Post-Soviet Water Governance. Water Alternatives, 2(1), 61-81.4.UNDP. (2004). Water, Critical Resource for Uzbekistan’s Future: National Human Development Report. United Nations Development Programme.5.Wegerich, K. (2008). Hydro-hegemony in the Amu Darya Basin. Water Policy, 10(S2), 71-88. |