This paper explores the diverse linguistic approaches employed in the study of the concept of "Justice." It examines how various branches of linguistics, including cognitive linguistics, discourse analysis, corpus linguistics, and sociolinguistics, contribute to a deeper understanding of this complex and multifaceted concept. By analyzing lexical choices, metaphorical mappings, narrative structures, and discursive strategies, this research investigates how "Justice" is constructed, negotiated, and contested in different socio-cultural contexts. Furthermore, ithighlights the role of language in shaping perceptions and ideologies related to justice, revealing the intricate interplay between linguistic representation and social reality. The investigation demonstrates that a linguistic perspective provides valuable insights into the conceptualization and enactment of "Justice," offering a nuanced understanding beyond traditional philosophical and legal frameworks
This paper explores the diverse linguistic approaches employed in the study of the concept of "Justice." It examines how various branches of linguistics, including cognitive linguistics, discourse analysis, corpus linguistics, and sociolinguistics, contribute to a deeper understanding of this complex and multifaceted concept. By analyzing lexical choices, metaphorical mappings, narrative structures, and discursive strategies, this research investigates how "Justice" is constructed, negotiated, and contested in different socio-cultural contexts. Furthermore, ithighlights the role of language in shaping perceptions and ideologies related to justice, revealing the intricate interplay between linguistic representation and social reality. The investigation demonstrates that a linguistic perspective provides valuable insights into the conceptualization and enactment of "Justice," offering a nuanced understanding beyond traditional philosophical and legal frameworks
| № | Muallifning F.I.Sh. | Lavozimi | Tashkilot nomi |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | hazratova I.. | Doctoral student in philosophy (PhD) | Karshi State University, |
| 2 | Tojiyeva G.. | Under the review of prof. | Karshi State University |
| № | Havola nomi |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1.Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse studies. Continuum.2.Bamberg, M. (2004). Narrative discourse and identities. In A. Pavlenko & A. Blackledge (Eds.), Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts (pp. 230-264). 3.Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.4.Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge.5.Conley, J. M., & O'Barr, W. M. (1990). Rules versus relationships: The ethnography of legal discourse. University of Chicago Press.6.Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111-137). Linguistic Society of South Korea.7.Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.8.Tiersma, P. M. (1999). Legal language. University of Chicago Press.9.Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. University of Pennsylvania Press.10.Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about-a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R. Wodak & M.Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1-13). Sage. |